Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/506,817

Strategic Treatment of Pressure Ulcer Using Sub-Epidermal Moisture Values

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 10, 2023
Examiner
WEARE, MEREDITH H
Art Unit
3791
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Bruin Biometrics LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 11m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allow Rate
348 granted / 694 resolved
-19.9% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
67 currently pending
Career history
761
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
§103
37.1%
-2.9% vs TC avg
§102
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
§112
32.4%
-7.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 694 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after 16 March 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 29 January 2026 has been entered. Status of Claims Claim(s) 21, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38 and 40 is/are currently amended. Claim(s) 1-20, 24, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37 and 39 has/have been canceled. Claim(s) 21-23, 25-28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38 and 40 is/are pending. Rejections Withdrawn Rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) (pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph), under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) (pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph), and/or under 35 U.S.C. 103 not reproduced below has/have been withdrawn in view of Applicant's amendments to the claims and/or submitted remarks. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 21-23, 25-28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38 and 40 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Regarding claim 21 and claims dependent thereon, limitations "c" and "d" are indefinite. It is unclear how, if at all, the assigned "risk level N" relates to the "level-0 risk," "level-1 risk," "level-2 risk," etc., particularly as there is no indication in the claim that assigning a risk level N requires assigning a numbered risk level (i.e., there is no indication that N is a numerical value that is assigned based on the delta value and first evaluation). For the purpose of this Office action, claim 21 will be further discussed with the understanding that N is an integer between 0 and 8 that is assigned based on the delta value and first evaluation, consistent with, e.g., Tables 1-2 and the "level-0," "level-1," "level-2," etc. risk levels subsequently recited in claim 21. For example, within the scope of: "assigning a risk level N to said subject based on said delta value and said first evaluation, wherein N is an integer between 0 and 8; d) administering an intervention level corresponding to said risk level N and performing SEM scans at a predetermined level-N frequency corresponding to said risk level N, wherein a level-0 risk corresponds to a level-0 intervention and a level-0 frequency of at least every 24 hours…." Allowable Subject Matter Claim 21, and claims dependent thereon, would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The prior art of record fails to disclose and/or suggest a method of identifying a risk of developing pressure ulcers in a subject and administering an intervention to said subject, the method comprising, inter alia, assigning a risk level N to said subject based on said delta value and said first evaluation, wherein N is an integer between 0 and 8; and administering an intervention level corresponding to said risk level N and performing SEM scans at a predetermined level-N frequency corresponding to said risk level N, wherein a level-0 risk corresponds to a level-0 intervention and a level-0 frequency of at least every 24 hours, a level-1 risk corresponds to a level-1 intervention and a level-1 frequency of at 1 east every 10 hours, a level-2 risk corresponds to a level-2 intervention and a level-2 frequency of at least at the beginning of each nursing shift, a level-3 risk corresponds to a level-3 intervention and a level-3 frequency of at least every 12 hours, a level-4 risk corresponds to a level-4 intervention and a level-4 frequency of at least every 8 hours, a level-5 risk corresponds to a level-5 intervention and a level-5 frequency of at least every 6 hours, a level-6 risk corresponds to a level-6 intervention and a level-6 frequency of at least every 4 hours, a level-7 risk corresponds to a level-7 intervention and a level-7 frequency of at least every 2 hours, and a level-8 risk corresponds to a level-8 intervention and a level-8 frequency of at least every 1 hour. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to Applicant's disclosure: see attached PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Meredith Weare whose telephone number is 571-270-3957. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice to schedule an interview. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Tse Chen, can be reached on 571-272-3672. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Meredith Weare/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 10, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 10, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 14, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 18, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 26, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Jan 29, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599314
Method and System for Electrode Verification
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599340
SPATIOTEMPORAL-BASED DETECTION AND CORRECTION OF MOTION ARTIFACT FOR MEASUREMENT OF ARTERIAL PRESSURE WAVEFORM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12582323
GUIDE WIRE CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12564328
GUIDE WIRE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING GUIDE WIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12527491
Methods and Systems for Monitoring Cardiorespiratory Function Using Photoplethysmography
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+32.6%)
3y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 694 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month