Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/509,530

Method for Operating a Drive Unit of a Vehicle Operable by Muscle Power and/or Motor Power

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Nov 15, 2023
Examiner
ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE, GERTRUDE
Art Unit
3661
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
3 (Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allow Rate
1410 granted / 1518 resolved
+40.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1544
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
§103
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1518 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the generation of torque which propels the vehicle" in line 8. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 2-18 are rejected for incorporating the deficiencies of their base claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 19-20 are allowed. The prior art does not specifically disclose a method for operating a drive unit of a vehicle operable by muscle power and/or motor power and comprising an electric motor and a control unit, comprising: performing a system start of a system including the drive unit by starting the drive unit; actuating, in response to the system start of the drive unit, the electric motor at a start current configured such that the electric motor rotates in a reverse direction of rotation; further actuating the electric motor at a test current in a non-torque generating direction during the actuating at the start current; estimating at least one motor parameter of the electric motor during the further actuation of the electric motor at the test current; and detecting an angular change of an electric angle, a test voltage in the non-torque generating direction, and the test current in the non-torque generating direction during the further actuation of the electric motor at the test current, wherein the estimation of the at least one motor parameter is performed by calculating a previously known machine model of the electric motor based on the detected angular change, and/or the detected test voltage, and/or the detected test current. Nor does the prior art specifically disclose a method for operating a drive unit of a vehicle operable by muscle power and/or motor power and comprising an electric motor and a control unit, comprising: actuating the electric motor at a start current configured such that the electric motor rotates in a reverse direction of rotation; further actuating the electric motor at a test current in a non-torque generating direction during the actuating at the start current; estimating at least one motor parameter of the electric motor during the further actuation of the electric motor at the test current; and detecting an angular change of an electric angle, a test voltage in the non-torque generating direction, and the test current in the non-torque generating direction during the further actuation of the electric motor at the test current, wherein the estimation of the at least one motor parameter is performed by calculating a previously known machine model of the electric motor based on the detected angular change, and/or the detected test voltage, and/or the detected test current. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 1/19/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. See rejection above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GERTRUDE ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE whose telephone number is (571)272-6954. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 7:30-8:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ramya P Burgess can be reached at 571-272-6011. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GERTRUDE ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3661
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 15, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 10, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jan 19, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602955
VEHICLE TERMINAL AND CALCULATION SERVER FOR CALCULATING SAFE DRIVING INDEX BASED ON LONGITUDINAL ACCELERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595778
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR OPTIMIZING OPERATING SWING OF VERTICAL SHAFT SUSPENDED HYDROGENERATOR UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594840
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECOVERING FROM TORQUE REDUCTION CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594842
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ELECTRIC MACHINE PEAK POWER MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589742
Systems and Methods for Adjusting a Driving Path Using Occluded Regions
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+4.3%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1518 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month