Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/518,996

DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 26, 2023
Examiner
DIALLO, MAMADOU L
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
1207 granted / 1315 resolved
+23.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1344
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§103
39.5%
-0.5% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1315 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Specification The specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant's cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/04/2025 is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3,13-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Zhu et al, US 20230361252 A1. PNG media_image1.png 315 618 media_image1.png Greyscale Pertaining to claim1, Zhu teaches ( see 7B upside down for example above) A display panel [200], wherein the display panel [200] comprises a substrate[110] and at least one light- emitting structure ( see 130/120 for example) disposed on the substrate[110], and the light-emitting structure comprises: a first light-emitting element[120], comprising a first color light-emitting layer[see blue microLEDs]; and a color conversion light-emitting element [70/170/30] for example) disposed on the substrate[110] in a stacking manner in a first direction with the first light-emitting element[130], wherein the first direction is a direction perpendicular to the substrate[110], and the color conversion light-emitting element comprises a second color light-emitting layer [30] and a third color color conversion layer[70] disposed in the first direction in a stacking manner with the second color light-emitting layer [170]. Pertaining to claim 2, Zhu teaches ( see 7B upside down for example above) The display panel as claimed in claim 1, wherein light-emitting efficiency of a quantum well material[70] of a third color is less than light-emitting efficiency of the second color light- emitting layer[30], and the quantum well material [70] of the third color comprises at least one of an InGaN quantum well material, a GaN quantum well material, an AlGaInP quantum well material, or a GaInP quantum well material ( see para 0035,0042). Pertaining to claim3, Zhu teaches ( see 7B upside down for example above) The display panel as claimed in claim 1, wherein light-emitting efficiency of a quantum well material [70] of a third color is less than light-emitting efficiency of the first color light-emitting layer[120]. Pertaining to claim 13, Zhu teaches ( see 7B upside down for example above) The display panel as claimed in claim 1, wherein a material[70] of the third color color conversion layer comprises a quantum dot material or a phosphor material ( Green QDs). Pertaining to claim14, Zhu teaches ( see 7B upside down for example above) A display apparatus , wherein the display panel [200] comprises a substrate[110] and at least one light- emitting structure ( see 130/120 for example) disposed on the substrate[110], and the light-emitting structure comprises: a first light-emitting element[120], comprising a first color light-emitting layer[see blue microLEDs]; and a color conversion light-emitting element [70/170/30] for example) disposed on the substrate[110] in a stacking manner in a first direction with the first light-emitting element[130], wherein the first direction is a direction perpendicular to the substrate[110], and the color conversion light-emitting element comprises a second color light-emitting layer [30] and a third color color conversion layer[70] disposed in the first direction in a stacking manner with the second color light-emitting layer [170]. Pertaining to claim 15, Zhu teaches ( see 7B upside down for example above The display apparatus as claimed in claim 14, wherein light-emitting efficiency of a quantum well material[70] of a third color is less than light-emitting efficiency of the second color light- emitting layer[30], and the quantum well material [70] of the third color comprises at least one of an InGaN quantum well material, a GaN quantum well material, an AlGaInP quantum well material, or a GaInP quantum well material ( see para 0035,0042). Pertaining to claim 16, Zhu teaches ( see 7B upside down for example above) The display apparatus as claimed in claim 14, wherein light-emitting efficiency of a quantum well material [70] of a third color is less than light-emitting efficiency of the first color light-emitting layer[120]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-12,17-20 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: The closest prior art of record of Zhu et al, US 20230361252 A1 teaches the limitation of claims 1 and 14 respectively , but it does not teach or suggest, singularly or in combination, at least the limitations of the dependent claims 4 and 17 including “wherein the light-emitting structure further comprises a second light-emitting element, the second light-emitting element, the first light- emitting element, and the color conversion light-emitting element are disposed on the substrate in a stacking manner in the first direction, the second light-emitting element comprises a fourth color light-emitting layer, and light-emitting efficiency of a quantum well material of a third color is less than light-emitting efficiency of the fourth color light-emitting layer.” in combination with the remaining limitations of the claims 14 and 17 respectively. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAMADOU L DIALLO whose telephone number is (571)270-5449. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:00AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, FERNANDO TOLEDO can be reached at (571)272-1867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAMADOU L DIALLO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604773
ELECTRONIC DEVICE HAVING OPAQUE LAYER WITH OPENING FOR LIGHT TRANSMISSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598758
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING DUMMY PAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598850
DISPLAY MODULE AND AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593467
THIN FILM SEMICONDUCTOR SWITCHING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588221
THREE-DIMENSIONAL FLASH MEMORY WITH HIGH DEGREE OF INTEGRATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+3.0%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1315 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month