Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/520,743

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 28, 2023
Priority
Mar 06, 2023 — JP 2023-033929
Examiner
RAHMAN, MOHAMMAD A
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
MIRISE Technologies Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
480 granted / 553 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
580
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
63.0%
+23.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§112
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 553 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Election/ Restrictions Applicant's election of group II without traverse: claims 1-5, in the “Response to Election / Restriction Filed - 03/02/2026”, withdrawal of non-elected claim(s) 6-9 is/are acknowledged. This office action considers claims 1-9, in “Claims - 03/02/2026”, pending for prosecution, of which claim(s) 6-9 is/are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) that forms the basis for the rejection set forth in this Office action: (a) NOVELTY; PRIOR ART.—A person shall be entitled to a patent unless— (1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention; Notes: when present, semicolon separated fields within the parenthesis (; ;) represent, for example, as (30A; Fig 2B; [0128]) = (element 30A; Figure No. 2B; Paragraph No. [0128]). For brevity, the texts “Element”, “Figure No.” and “Paragraph No.” shall be excluded, though; additional clarification notes may be added within each field. The number of fields may be fewer or more than three indicated above. These conventions are used throughout this document. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kadoguchi et al. (US 20140035112 A1 – hereinafter Kadoguchi). Regarding Claim 1, Kadoguchi teaches a semiconductor device (see the entire document; Fig. 6C; specifically, ([0112] - [0116]), and as cited below), comprising: a first connection target (10 – Fig. 6C – [0113]) and a second connection target (20) arranged on one surface of a substrate ({31, 32}); a first lead wire ({12, 12a, 14}) connected to the first connection target (10); a second lead wire ({22, 22a, 24}) connected to the second connection target (20); and a sealing resin (53 – [0116]) that seals the first connection target (10), the second connection target (20), the first lead wire ({12, 12a, 14, 14a}), and the second lead wire ({22, 22a, 24, 24a}), wherein the first lead wire ({12, 12a, 14, 14a}) includes a first connection portion (12) connected to the first connection target (10), a first top portion (14a) exposed from the sealing resin (53), and a first standing portion (14) inclined with respect to the one surface and connecting the first connection portion (12) and the first top portion (14a), the second lead wire ({22, 22a, 24}) includes a second connection portion (22) connected to the second connection target (20), a second top portion (24a) exposed from the sealing resin (53), and a second standing portion (24) inclined with respect to the one surface and connecting the second connection portion (22) and the second top portion (24a), and the first top portion (14a) and the second top portion (14a) are disposed to face each other (they face laterally). Regarding Claim 2, Kadoguchi teaches the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the first top portion and the second top portion face each other across a recess formed in the sealing resin (recess being where 43 and 33 are formed). Regarding Claim 3, Kadoguchi teaches the semiconductor device according to claim 2, wherein an end surface of the first top portion (top end) and an end surface of the second top portion (top end) are exposed from the sealing resin (53) in the recess. Regarding Claim 4, Kadoguchi teaches the semiconductor device according to claim 2, further comprising an embedded resin embedding the recess (Fig. 6C shows the recess is embedded by resin 53). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is the Examiner’s Reasons for Allowance: The prior art fails to disclose and would not have rendered obvious: Regarding claim 5: The semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the first top portion has a tapered shape in which a thickness decreases from a part connected to the first standing portion toward an end part facing the second top portion, and the second top portion has a tapered shape in which a thickness decreases from a part connected to the second standing portion toward an end part facing the first top portion. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMMAD A. RAHMAN whose telephone number is (571) 270-0168 and email is mohammad.rahman5@uspto.gov. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri 8:00-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julio J. Maldonado can be reached on (571) 272-1864. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHAMMAD A RAHMAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 28, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 23, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 23, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685134
LOCAL FRONTSIDE POWER RAIL WITH GLOBAL BACKSIDE POWER DELIVERY
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684842
POWER SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684907
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677530
DISPLAY PANEL AND EVAPORATION METHOD FOR DISPLAY PANEL
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677473
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+11.1%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 553 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month