Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/522,527

DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ALIGNING LIGHT-EMITTING DIODES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 29, 2023
Examiner
DYKES, LAURA M
Art Unit
2892
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Century Technology (Shenzhen) Corporation Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allow Rate
321 granted / 497 resolved
-3.4% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
539
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 497 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This OA is in response to the amendment filled on 3/10/2026 that has been entered, wherein claims 1-14 are pending and claims 11-14 are withdrawn. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I, claims 1-10 in the reply filed on 5/10/2026 is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 5/14/2024 and 10/29/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wu (US 2021/0398837 A1). Regarding claim 1, Wu teaches a device(Fig. 2) configured for aligning a plurality of light-emitting diodes (LEDs)(50, ¶0024, Fig. 7) by using a carrier substrate(34, ¶0024), the carrier substrate(34, ¶0024) defining a plurality of positioning grooves(46, ¶0029, Fig. 7), each of the plurality of positioning grooves(46, ¶0029, Fig. 7) being configured to accommodate one of the plurality of LEDs(50, ¶0024, Fig. 7), the device comprising: a carrying part(23, ¶0024) configured to carry the carrier substrate(34, ¶0024); a vibration part(36, ¶0027) connected to the carrying part(23, ¶0024), the vibration part(36, ¶0027) being for vibrating the carrier substrate(34, ¶0024); and a magnetic generator(27, ¶0031. Fig. 7) on a side of the carrier substrate(34, ¶0024) away from the plurality of positioning grooves(46, ¶0029, Fig. 7), the magnetic generator(27, ¶0031. Fig. 7) being for generating a magnetic field(¶0033). Regarding claim 3, Wu teaches the device according to claim 1, wherein the carrying part(23, ¶0024) comprises a bottom plate(horizontal part of 23) and a blocking plate(vertical part of 23) connected to the bottom plate(horizontal part of 23), the bottom plate(horizontal part of 23) is configured to carry the carrier substrate(34, ¶0024), and the blocking plate(vertical part of 23) is configured to fix the carrier substrate(34, ¶0024) and limit a moving range of the plurality of LEDs(50, ¶0024, Fig. 7). Regarding claim 7, Wu teaches the device according to claim 1, further comprising a feeding box(not illustrated, transporting tool vibrating tray, ¶0035, ¶0037), wherein the feeding box(not illustrated, transporting tool vibrating tray, ¶0035, ¶0037) is configured for providing the plurality of LEDs(50, ¶0024, Fig. 7) to the carrier substrate(34, ¶0024). Regarding claim 8, Wu teaches the device according to claim 1, further comprising a camera, wherein the camera(25, ¶0024) is on a side of the carrying part(23, ¶0024) for carrying the carrier substrate(34, ¶0024), and is configured to acquire position information of the plurality of LEDs(50, ¶0024, Fig. 7) on the carrier substrate(34, ¶0024). Regarding claim 9, Wu teaches the device according to claim 1, further comprising a tilting platform(30, 21, ¶0025-26), wherein the tilting platform(30, 21, ¶0025-26) is on a side of the vibration part(36, ¶0027) away from the magnetic generator(27, ¶0031. Fig. 7), and is configured to tilt the vibration part(36, ¶0027). Regarding claim 10, Wu teaches the device according to claim 9, wherein the tilting platform(30, 21, ¶0025-26) comprises a support platform(21, ¶0025) and a plurality of tilting columns(32, ¶0025-26) connected to the support platform(21, ¶0025), the support platform(21, ¶0025) is configured to carry the vibration part(36, ¶0027), and each of the plurality of tilting columns(32, ¶0025-26) is retractable(¶0026). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 2 and 4-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wu (US 2021/0398837 A1) in view of Akoi (US 2012/0057140 A1). Regarding claim 2, Wu teaches the device according to claim 1, wherein the vibration part(36, ¶0027) for controlling a moving direction of the plurality of LEDs(50, ¶0024, Fig. 7). Wu is not relied on to teach the vibration part(36, ¶0027) comprises a voice coil motor. Akoi teaches a device(Fig. 2) wherein the vibration part(PST) comprises a voice coil motor(18x, 18y, ¶0085). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Wu, so that the vibration part comprises a voice coil motor, as taught by Akoi, so that the plurality of LEDs can be moved in coarse movement with long strokes in the X, Y, two axial directions and also be finely moved in directions of three degrees of freedom, which are X, Y, and Z directions(¶0085). Regarding claim 4, Wu teaches the device according to claim 3, wherein the vibration part(36, ¶0027) comprises a housing(36, ¶0027), and the housing(36, ¶0027) is fixedly connected to the bottom plate(horizontal part of 23). Wu is not relied on to teach a voice coil motor in the housing(36, ¶0027). Akoi teaches a device(Fig. 2) comprising a voice coil motor(18x, 18y, ¶0085) in the housing(21, ¶0085). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Wu, to include a voice coil motor in the housing, as taught by Akoi, so that the plurality of LEDs can be moved in coarse movement with long strokes in the X, Y, two axial directions and also be finely moved in directions of three degrees of freedom, which are X, Y, and Z directions(¶0085). Regarding claim 5, Wu teaches the device according to claim 4, wherein the bottom plate(horizontal part of 23) is spaced apart from the housing(36, ¶0027), the magnetic generator(27, ¶0031. Fig. 7) is between the bottom plate(horizontal part of 23) and the housing(36, ¶0027). Regarding claim 6, Wu teaches the device according to claim 5, wherein the magnetic generator(27, ¶0031. Fig. 7) is partially embedded in the housing(36, ¶0027). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAURA DYKES whose telephone number is (571)270-3161. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30 am-5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, N. Drew Richards can be reached at 571-272-1736. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAURA M DYKES/Examiner, Art Unit 2892
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 29, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604567
DRIVING SUBSTRATE, MICRO LED TRANSFER DEVICE AND MICRO LED TRANSFER METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604635
DISPLAY SCREEN, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604648
DISPLAY DEVICE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND TILED DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599024
DISPLAY MODULE AND SUBSTRATE THEREOF HAVING IMPROVED BINDING RELIABILITY OF SUBSTRATE AND FLEXIBLE CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588376
Substrate Arrangement and Manufacturing Method for a Micro Display
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+27.9%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 497 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month