Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/523,007

METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND CORRESPONDING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 29, 2023
Priority
Nov 30, 2022 — IT 102022000024687
Examiner
CRAWFORD EASON, LATANYA N
Art Unit
2813
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
STMicroelectronics N.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
730 granted / 931 resolved
+10.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
971
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
54.3%
+14.3% vs TC avg
§102
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
§112
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 931 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-9 in the reply filed on 4/09/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 10-16 have been canceled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4 & 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gomez (US Pub no. 2009/0057854 A1) in view of Xiaochun (US Pub no. 2005/019985 A1) Regarding claim 1, Gomez et al discloses A method, comprising: providing at least one electrically conductive clip(1) having an end that includes: a planar proximal portion (11)and a distal portion(19) projecting distally beyond the planar proximal portion(11) [0041] fig. 2a, wherein the distal portion(19) includes sculpturing[0042]; arranging at least one semiconductor die (3) at a die mounting location(4) of an electrically conductive substrate(lead frame) [0033], the electrically conductive substrate (lead frame )comprising an array of electrically conductive leads(41/42/43); and arranging said at least one electrically conductive clip (1) in a bridge position between the at least one semiconductor die (3)and at least one electrically conductive lead (43)in the array of electrically conductive leads (41/42/43)to provide electrical coupling therebetween[0036]; wherein arranging said at least one electrically conductive clip (1)comprises: contacting the planar proximal portion (11)with the at least one electrically conductive lead(43); and engaging said sculpturing (19) in the position between the at least one semiconductor chip(3) and the at least one electrically conductive lead(43 or 33) in the array of electrically conductive leads(43/42/41)[0036]. Gomez et al fails to teach electrically conductive leads having openings at a the periphery of said electrically conductive substrate; and engaging said sculpturing in said openings to facilitate immobilizing the at least one electrically conductive clip. Xiaochun et al discloses electrically conductive lead(140) having openings (112)at a the periphery of said electrically conductive substrate (leadframe); and engaging said clip forks (122) in said openings (112)to facilitate immobilizing the at least one electrically conductive clip(102)[0024]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Gomez et al with the teaching of Xiaochun et al to provide interlock coupling that constraints the x- and y- dimension displacement and ensure consistent x- and y- dimension control over placement of the clip. Regarding claim 2, Gomez et al discloses wherein providing the at least one electrically conductive clip(1) further comprises providing said distal portion (19)with a fork comprising plural prongs distally projecting beyond the proximal portion(11), wherein said sculpturing(15) is provided in the plural prongs[0042] fig. 2a. Regarding claim 3, Gomez et al discloses wherein providing the at least one electrically conductive clip(1) further comprises providing said end(19) as a downset portion of the electrically conductive clip(1)[0041]. Regarding claim 4, Gomez et al discloses further comprising providing said sculpturing (15)as at least one protrusion from the distal portion (19)of said end of the at least one electrically conductive clip(1). Regarding claim 8, Gomez et al discloses further comprising soldering the at least one electrically conductive clip(1) to the at least one semiconductor chip (3)[0049] Xiaochun et al teaches at least one electrically conductive lead (140)to provide electrical coupling there between, with the at least one electrically conductive clip (102)immobilized in the bridge said bridge like position as a result of the sculpturing (122)in said distal portion engaging said openings(112)[0024]. Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gomez (US Pub no. 2009/0057854 A1) in view of Xiaochun (US Pub no. 2005/019985 A1) as applied to claim 1 and further in view of Fuergut (US Pub no. 2021/0225798 A1). Regarding claim 5, Gomez et al as modified by Xiaochun et al discloses all the claim limitations of claim 1 but fails to teach further comprising providing said sculpturing via additive manufacturing. Fuergut et al discloses an additive process to form a clip structure(33.2)[0057]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention of Gomez et al as modified by Xiaochun with the teachings of Fuergut et al to achieve sculpturing since a particular additive processing was recognized as part of the ordinary capabilities of one skilled in the art. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been capable of applying this known technique to a known device (method, or product) that was ready for improvement and the results would have been predictable to one of ordinary skill in the art. In re Nilssen, 851 F.2d 1401, 7 USPQ2d 1500 (Fed. Cir. 1988) Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gomez (US Pub no. 2009/0057854 A1) in view of Xiaochun (US Pub no. 2005/019985 A1)as applied to claim 1 and further in view of Kalfus (US Patent 4935803 A) Regarding claim 9, Gomez et al as modified by Xiaochun et al discloses all the claim limitations of claim 1 but fails to teach including the electrically conductive substrate in a set of electrically conductive substrates having respective die mounting locations, wherein the electrically conductive substrates in the set are coupled via sacrificial connecting bars between electrically conductive leads in adjacent electrically conductive substrates in the set; processing the electrically conductive substrates in the set coupled via the sacrificial connecting bars by arranging semiconductor dice at respective die mounting locations and arranging electrically conductive clips in the bridge a bridge-like position between semiconductor dice arranged at respective die mounting locations and electrically conductive leads in arrays of electrically conductive leads of the electrically conductive substrates in the set to provide electrical coupling therebetween; and subsequent to said processing, cutting at the sacrificial connecting bars the set of electrically conductive substrates having said semiconductor dice and said electrically conductive clips arranged thereon to produce, as a result of said cutting, singulated semiconductor devices wherein the distal portions of the electrically conductive clips are exposed at a the periphery of the singulated semiconductor devices. However, Kalfus et al discloses a method including the electrically conductive substrate (120)in a set of electrically conductive substrates (120D-120E)having respective die mounting locations(13) (col. 7, lines 25-27 & lines 48-49), wherein the electrically conductive substrates(120D-120E)in the set are coupled via sacrificial connecting bars (122/124)between electrically conductive leads (12/50)in adjacent electrically conductive substrates(120D-120E)in the set (fig. 10)(col. 7, lines 47-54); processing the electrically conductive substrates ((120D-120E))in the set coupled via the sacrificial connecting bars(122/124) by arranging semiconductor dice (16)at respective die mounting locations(13) and arranging electrically conductive clips(60) in the bridge a bridge-like position between semiconductor dice (16)arranged at respective die mounting locations(13) and electrically conductive leads(12/50) in arrays of electrically conductive leads(12/50) of the electrically conductive substrates((120D-120E)) in the set to provide electrical coupling therebetween(col. 8 lines 30-34); and subsequent to said processing, cutting at the sacrificial connecting bars(122/124) the set of electrically conductive substrates((120D-120E)) having said semiconductor dice (16)and said electrically conductive clips (60)arranged thereon to produce, as a result of said cutting, singulated semiconductor devices wherein the distal portions of the electrically conductive clips are exposed at a the periphery of the singulated semiconductor devices(col. 9 lines 15-20). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to further modify Gomez et al and Xiaochun et al with the teachings of Kalfus et al to provide a fabrication process for power devices. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 6-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LATANYA N CRAWFORD EASON whose telephone number is (571)270-3208. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30 AM-4:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven B Gauthier can be reached at (571)270-0373. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LATANYA N CRAWFORD EASON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2813
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707768
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701717
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12672400
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12642008
MEMORY DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR DIE
4y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641932
Display Device
3y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+0.5%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 931 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month