Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/523,508

PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 29, 2023
Examiner
ERDEM, FAZLI
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
895 granted / 1050 resolved
+17.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1082
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
48.4%
+8.4% vs TC avg
§102
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1050 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shimada 20240313022 in view of Miyajima et al. 20100282948 further in view of Kasukawa (202500721400) Regarding Claim 1, in Fig 7 paragraph 0132 and Fig. 11 paragraph 0146, along with paragraph 0170-183 (SPAD) Shimada et al. discloses photoelectric conversion apparatus including an avalanche photodiode, the apparatus comprising: a semiconductor layer having a first surface and a second surface; a first semiconductor region of a first conductivity type disposed at a first depth; a second semiconductor region of a second conductivity type disposed at a second depth that is greater than the first depth from the first surface, wherein the second semiconductor region forms the avalanche photodiode together with the first semiconductor region; a third semiconductor region of the first conductivity type provided in contact with an end portion of the first semiconductor region; an oxide film disposed on the first surface of the semiconductor layer. (Please note that element 371 is a polysilicon TFT in Shiamada); Shimada fails to disclose the limitation where a member provided on an opposite side of the oxide film from the semiconductor layer in cross-sectional view; wiring; and a contact plug configured to connect the wiring to the first surface of the semiconductor layer, wherein the member is disposed to overlap at least a boundary between the first semiconductor region and the third semiconductor region in plan view, wherein the member is disposed between the wiring and the semiconductor layer, and wherein a work function of the member differs from a work function of each of the first semiconductor region and the third semiconductor region so that a potential gradient for signal charge is generated in a depth direction of the semiconductor layer at at least the boundary. However, Miyajima eta l. discloses an avalanche photodiode where in paragraphs 0073, 0074, 0076, the required member (n/p doped polysilicon) is disclosed. Furthermore, Kasukawa discloses an avalanche photodiode where in paragraph 0172 along with paragraphs 0125, 0126, 0127, 0153, 0154 and 0255, the required workfunction/potential gradient is disclosed. It would have been obvious to one of having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the required member and potential gradient in Shimada as taught by Miyajima and Kasukawa, respectively, in order to increase the performance of the avalanche photodiode. Regarding Claim 2, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, wherein the member is made of polysilicon of the second conductivity type. Regarding Claim 3, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, wherein the first conductivity type is an N type, and wherein the work function of the member is greater than the work function of each of the first semiconductor region and the third semiconductor region. Regarding Claim 4, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, wherein the member is made of P-type polysilicon. Regarding Claim 5, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, wherein the first conductivity type is a P type, and wherein the work function of the member is less than the work function of each of the first semiconductor region and the third semiconductor region. Regarding Claim 6, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, wherein the member is made of N-type polysilicon. Regarding Claim 7, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, a first wiring portion electrically connected to the first semiconductor region; and a second wiring portion electrically connected to the second semiconductor region, wherein the first wiring portion is electrically connected to the member. Regarding Claim 8, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, wherein the member overlaps the entire first semiconductor region in plan view. Regarding Claim 9, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, wherein the member overlaps the entire third semiconductor region in plan view. Regarding Claim 10, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, further comprising: a protective film provided on the oxide film; and an interlayer film provided on the protective film, wherein the member is disposed between the protective film and the interlayer film. Regarding Claim 11, in Fig 7 paragraph 0132 and Fig. 11 paragraph 0146, along with paragraph 0170-183 (SPAD), Shimada et al. discloses a photoelectric conversion apparatus having an avalanche photodiode, the apparatus comprising: a semiconductor layer having a first surface and a second surface; a first semiconductor region of a first conductivity type disposed at a first depth; a second semiconductor region of a second conductivity type disposed at a second depth that is greater than the first depth from the first surface, wherein the second semiconductor region forms the avalanche photodiode together with the first semiconductor region; a third semiconductor region of the first conductivity type provided in contact with an end portion of the first semiconductor region; an oxide film disposed on the first surface of the semiconductor layer; a protective film disposed on an opposite side of the oxide film from the semiconductor layer, wherein the protective film is made of a material that differs from a material used for the oxide film; an interlayer film disposed on an opposite side of the protective film from the oxide film; and a member provided between the oxide film and the protective film in cross-sectional view, wherein the member is disposed to overlap at least a boundary between the first semiconductor region and the third semiconductor region in plan view. Shimada fails to disclose the limitation where a member provided on an opposite side of the oxide film from the semiconductor layer in cross-sectional view; wiring; and a contact plug configured to connect the wiring to the first surface of the semiconductor layer, wherein the member is disposed to overlap at least a boundary between the first semiconductor region and the third semiconductor region in plan view, wherein the member is disposed between the wiring and the semiconductor layer, and wherein a work function of the member differs from a work function of each of the first semiconductor region and the third semiconductor region so that a potential gradient for signal charge is generated in a depth direction of the semiconductor layer at at least the boundary. However, Miyajima eta l. discloses an avalanche photodiode where in paragraphs 0073, 0074, 0076, the required member (n/p doped polysilicon) is disclosed. Furthermore, Kasukawa discloses an avalanche photodiode where in paragraph 0172 along with paragraphs 0125, 0126, 0127, 0153, 0154 and 0255, the required workfunction/potential gradient is disclosed. It would have been obvious to one of having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the required member and potential gradient in Shimada as taught by Miyajima and Kasukawa, respectively, in order to increase the performance of the avalanche photodiode. Regarding Claim 12, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, wherein an interface state density between the oxide film and the member is lower than an interface state density between the oxide film and the protective film. Regarding Claim 13, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, wherein an outer edge of the member is disposed within one pixel in plan view. Regarding Claim 14, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, further comprising: a first wiring portion electrically connected to the first semiconductor region; and a second wiring portion electrically connected to the second semiconductor region, wherein the first wiring portion is electrically connected to the member. Regarding Claim 15, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, wherein the member overlaps the entire first semiconductor region in plan view. Regarding Claim 16, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, wherein the member overlaps the entire third semiconductor region in plan view. Regarding Claim 17, in Fig 7 paragraph 0132 and Fig. 11 paragraph 0146, along with paragraph 0170-183 (SPAD), Shimada et al. discloses a photoelectric conversion apparatus including an avalanche photodiode, the apparatus comprising: a semiconductor layer having a first surface and a second surface; a first semiconductor region of a first conductivity type disposed at a first depth; A second semiconductor region of a second conductivity type disposed at a second depth that is greater than the first depth from the first surface, wherein the second semiconductor region forms the avalanche photodiode together with the first semiconductor region; a third semiconductor region of the first conductivity type provided in contact with an end portion of the first semiconductor region; an oxide film disposed on the first surface of the semiconductor layer; a member provided on an opposite side of the oxide film from the semiconductor layer in cross-sectional view; wiring; and a contact plug configured to connect the wiring to the first surface of the semiconductor layer, wherein the member is disposed to overlap at least a boundary between the first semiconductor region and the third semiconductor region in plan view, wherein the member is disposed between the wiring and the semiconductor layer, and wherein the member is made of second conductivity type polysilicon. Shimada fails to disclose the limitation where a member provided on an opposite side of the oxide film from the semiconductor layer in cross-sectional view; wiring; and a contact plug configured to connect the wiring to the first surface of the semiconductor layer, wherein the member is disposed to overlap at least a boundary between the first semiconductor region and the third semiconductor region in plan view, wherein the member is disposed between the wiring and the semiconductor layer, and wherein a work function of the member differs from a work function of each of the first semiconductor region and the third semiconductor region so that a potential gradient for signal charge is generated in a depth direction of the semiconductor layer at at least the boundary. However, Miyajima eta l. discloses an avalanche photodiode where in paragraphs 0073, 0074, 0076, the required member (n/p doped polysilicon) is disclosed. Furthermore, Kasukawa discloses an avalanche photodiode where in paragraph 0172 along with paragraphs 0125, 0126, 0127, 0153, 0154 and 0255, the required workfunction/potential gradient is disclosed. It would have been obvious to one of having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the required member and potential gradient in Shimada as taught by Miyajima and Kasukawa, respectively, in order to increase the performance of the avalanche photodiode. Regarding Claim 18, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, further comprising: a first wiring portion electrically connected to the first semiconductor region; and a second wiring portion electrically connected to the second semiconductor region, wherein the first wiring portion is electrically connected to the member. Regarding Claim 19, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, and a signal processing unit configured to generate an image by using a signal output from the photoelectric conversion apparatus. Regarding Claim 20, in Shimada, Miyajima et al. and Kasukawa combination, a mobile object comprising: the photoelectric conversion apparatus according to Claim 1; and a control unit configured to control movement of the mobile object by using a signal output from the photoelectric conversion apparatus. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FAZLI ERDEM whose telephone number is (571)272-1914. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davienne Monbleau can be reached at 571-272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FAZLI ERDEM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812 1/22/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593563
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593631
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588498
FINFET STRUCTURE WITH CONTROLLED AIR GAPS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581679
SPLIT-GATE POWER MOS DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581877
SELECTIVE DEPOSITION OF METAL OXIDES USING SILANES AS AN INHIBITOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1050 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month