Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/523,852

MEASURING THE COVERAGE OF A COMPETING WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 29, 2023
Examiner
ACOLATSE, KODZOVI
Art Unit
2478
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
At&T Mobility Ii LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
761 granted / 913 resolved
+25.4% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
63 currently pending
Career history
976
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
§112
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 913 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is responsive to Application 18/523,852 filed 11/29/2023 in which claims 1-20 are presented for examination. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 6-8, 17-19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bodine et al (US 2011/0039571 A1). Regarding claim 1, Bodine teaches a method comprising: sending, by a processing system including at least one processor, an instruction to an application executing on a mobile device, where the instruction causes the application to configure the mobile device to measure and report a radio frequency of a first wireless communications access network (Bodine: Figs. 1 and 3; [0006], [0034], MS/mobile device polled by server 41 to report measurement data), wherein the mobile device is subscribed to a service provided by a second wireless communications access network (Bodine: Fig. 1; [0040]; [0043] MS reports the measurement associated with pre-handover and post-handover); receiving, by the processing system, measurements of the radio frequency of the first wireless communications access network from the mobile device (Bodine: Fig. 1; [0040]; [0043] MS reports the measurement associated with pre-handover and post-handover); and generating, by the processing system, a coverage map illustrating a coverage of the first wireless communications access network, using the measurements (Bodine: Fig. 1; [0028], [0035] a coverage map is generated from the measurements). Regarding claim 19, Bodine teaches a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions which, when executed by a processing system including at least one processor, cause the processing system to perform operations, the operations comprising: sending an instruction to an application executing on a mobile device, where the instruction causes the application to configure the mobile device to measure and report a radio frequency of a first wireless communications access network (Bodine: Figs. 1 and 3; [0006], [0034], MS/mobile device polled by server 41 to report measurement data), wherein the mobile device is subscribed to a service provided by a second wireless communications access network (Bodine: Figs. 1 and 3; [0006], [0034], MS/mobile device polled by server 41 to report measurement data) receiving measurements of the radio frequency of the first wireless communications access network from the mobile device (Bodine: Fig. 1; [0040]; [0043] MS reports the measurement associated with pre-handover and post-handover); and generating a coverage map illustrating a coverage of the first wireless communications access network, using the measurements (Bodine: Fig. 1; [0028], [0035] a coverage map is generated from the measurements). Regarding claim 20, Bodine teaches a device comprising: a processing system including at least one processor; and a computer-readable medium storing instructions which, when executed by the processing system, cause the processing system to perform operations, the operations comprising: sending an instruction to an application executing on a mobile device, where the instruction causes the application to configure the mobile device to measure and report a radio frequency of a first wireless communications access network (Bodine: Figs. 1 and 3; [0006], [0034], MS/mobile device polled by server 41 to report measurement data), wherein the mobile device is subscribed to a service provided by a second wireless communications access network (Bodine: Figs. 1 and 3; [0006], [0034], MS/mobile device polled by server 41 to report measurement data); receiving measurements of the radio frequency of the first wireless communications access network from the mobile device (Bodine: Fig. 1; [0040]; [0043] MS reports the measurement associated with pre-handover and post-handover); and generating a coverage map illustrating a coverage of the first wireless communications access network, using the measurements (Bodine: Fig. 1; [0028], [0035] a coverage map is generated from the measurements). Regarding claim 2, Bodine teaches wherein each of: the first wireless communications access network and the second wireless communications access network comprises a radio access network (Bodine: Fig. 3; [0037], [0040]). Regarding claim 6, Bodine teaches wherein the instruction further defines a schedule by which the mobile device is to measure the radio frequency of the first wireless communications access network (Bodine: [0032]-[0034], periodic measurements). Regarding claim 7, Bodine teaches wherein the schedule is defined to minimize an impact of measurement and reporting of the radio frequency on at least one of: a transport of the first wireless communications access network, a key performance indicator of the first wireless communications access network, a transport of the second wireless communications access network, or a key performance indicator of the second wireless communications access network (Bodine: [0032]-[0034], periodic measurements). Regarding claim 8, Bodine teaches wherein the measurements of the radio frequency include an evolved universal mobile telecommunications system terrestrial radio access absolute radio frequency channel number of the first wireless communications access network and a physical location at which the evolved universal mobile telecommunications system terrestrial radio access absolute radio frequency channel number of the first wireless communications access network was measured (Bodine: [0034]-[0035], [0054]). Regarding claim 17, Bodine teaches repeating the sending, the receiving, and the generating for additional mobile devices that are subscribed to the service provided by the second wireless communications access network (Bodine: Fig. 1; [0003]-[0006]; [0040]; [0043] MS reports the measurement associated with pre-handover and post-handover). Regarding claim 18, Bodine teaches wherein the generating uses the measurements received from the mobile device as well as measurements received from the additional mobile devices (Bodine: Fig. 1; [0003]-[0006]; [0040]; [0043] MS reports the measurement associated with pre-handover and post-handover). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bodine et al (US 2011/0039571 A1) in view of Shrivastava et al (US 2024/0098537 A1). Regarding claim 3, Bodine does not explicitly disclose wherein at least one parameter of the mobile device to be configured according to the instruction varies according to at least one of: a type of the mobile device, a manufacturer of the mobile device, or a model of the mobile device. Shrivastava teaches wherein at least one parameter of the mobile device to be configured according to the instruction varies according to at least one of: a type of the mobile device, a manufacturer of the mobile device, or a model of the mobile device (Shrivastava: [0031]; [0038], based on device capability/device type). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Bodine wherein at least one parameter of the mobile device to be configured according to the instruction varies according to at least one of: a type of the mobile device, a manufacturer of the mobile device, or a model of the mobile device as disclosed by Shrivastava to provide a system for determining wireless coverage map (Shrivastava: Abstract) Regarding claim 4, Bodine in view of Shrivastava teaches wherein the at least one parameter of the mobile device includes at least one of: an addition of an evolved universal mobile telecommunications system terrestrial radio access absolute radio frequency channel number of the first wireless communications access network to an evolved universal mobile telecommunications system terrestrial radio access frequency of the mobile device, an enablement of inter-frequency handovers, or an activation of a cell trace profile for performance management-initiated measurement events (Shrivastava: Fig. 1; [0031]-32], [0038] server determining coverage map using tacking/cell trace profile). Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bodine et al (US 2011/0039571 A1) in view of Shrivastava et al (US 2024/0098537 A1) in further view of Jung et al (US 2013/0072182 A1). Regarding claim 5, Bodine in view of Shrivastava does not teach wherein the at least one parameter of the mobile device include at least one of: an addition of a handover parameter to neighboring inter-frequency LTE cells to the mobile device for each cell of the first wireless communications access network or a trigger that causes an inter-frequency handover to occur when a radio frequency signal strength of a serving cell becomes worse than a first threshold while the a radio frequency signal strength of a neighboring cell becomes better than a second threshold. Jung teaches wherein the at least one parameter of the mobile device include at least one of: an addition of a handover parameter to neighboring inter-frequency LTE cells to the mobile device for each cell of the first wireless communications access network or a trigger that causes an inter-frequency handover to occur when a radio frequency signal strength of a serving cell becomes worse than a first threshold while the a radio frequency signal strength of a neighboring cell becomes better than a second threshold (Jung: Fig. 8; [0112]-[0130]). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Bodine in view of Shrivastava wherein the at least one parameter of the mobile device include at least one of: an addition of a handover parameter to neighboring inter-frequency LTE cells to the mobile device for each cell of the first wireless communications access network or a trigger that causes an inter-frequency handover to occur when a radio frequency signal strength of a serving cell becomes worse than a first threshold while the a radio frequency signal strength of a neighboring cell becomes better than a second threshold to provide a system for inter-RAT handover (Jung: Abstract). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KODZOVI ACOLATSE whose telephone number is (571)270-1999. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 10 am to 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Avellino Joseph can be reached at (571) 272-3905. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KODZOVI ACOLATSE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2478
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 29, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604218
PERFORMANCE DEGRADATION HANDLING BETWEEN RADIO ACCESS NETWORK NODES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604166
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC APN SELECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598028
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598620
TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593341
METHOD FOR CARRIER DETERMINATION, TERMINAL DEVICE, AND NETWORK DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.3%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 913 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month