Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

At&T Mobility Ii LLC

9 pending office actions • 9 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 49 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
4
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (4)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
6
Medium (67%)
2
Easy (22%)
1
Unknown (11%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only6 (67%)
§112 only2 (22%)
No statute on record1 (11%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
6
Information Tech
67% of docket
2
Communications
22% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
11% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MADAMBA, GLENFORD J 1 81.1% +18.6%
SHAH, MEHULKUMAR J 1 67.1% +37.3%
SHARMA, SHIVAM 1 41.5% +5.3%
TULOP, JIRAPON INTAVONG 1 69.4% +24.0%
MAMUN, ABDULLAH AL 1 70.6% +25.7%
FEITL, LEAH M 1 25.0% +7.0%
XIA, XUYANG 1 71.5% +53.4%
ALABI, OLUWATOSIN O 1 59.8% +22.6%
RAHMAN, IBRAHIM 1 0.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17336573 METHOD OF GENERATING SOLUTIONS FOR COMPLEX BUSINESS PROBLEMS INVOLVING GROUPS OF EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL USING AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL RAHMAN, IBRAHIM 24d overdue
18178485 NETWORK MANAGEMENT FOR MULTI-VENDOR HYBRID QUANTUM-CLASSICAL NETWORKS FEITL, LEAH M 22d

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18921134 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USER DEFINED NETWORK ENABLED CONTENT FILTERING MADAMBA, GLENFORD J 3d overdue
17939544 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR QUANTUM AND CLASSICAL NETWORK MANAGEMENT XIA, XUYANG 15d
18298301 SUBSCRIBER IDENTITY MODULE APPLICATION-BASED NETWORK REGISTRATION FAILURE RESOLUTION MAMUN, ABDULLAH AL 16d
18750435 NETWORK ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION USING MACHINE LEARNING SHAH, MEHULKUMAR J 34d
17493712 MINIMIZING ALGORITHMIC BIAS IN MACHINE LEARNING MODELS ALABI, OLUWATOSIN O 61d
18393576 DYNAMIC TRAFFIC CLASSIFICATION AND HANDLING USING CHARGING COUNTERS TULOP, JIRAPON INTAVONG 84d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2451 1
2459 1
3665 1
2693 1
2646 1
2147 1
2143 1
2129 1
2122 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18921134 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USER DEFINED NETWORK ENABLED CONTENT FILTERING MADAMBA, GLENFORD J 2451 Other Non-Final OA 3d overdue Pending Oct 21, 2024
18750435 NETWORK ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION USING MACHINE LEARNING SHAH, MEHULKUMAR J 2459 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Jun 21, 2024
18416212 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MODULE AND ANTENNA REPLACEMENT IN CONNECTED VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SHARMA, SHIVAM 3665 §112 Final Rejection 15d Pending Jan 18, 2024
18393576 DYNAMIC TRAFFIC CLASSIFICATION AND HANDLING USING CHARGING COUNTERS TULOP, JIRAPON INTAVONG 2693 §103 Non-Final OA 84d Pending Dec 21, 2023
18298301 SUBSCRIBER IDENTITY MODULE APPLICATION-BASED NETWORK REGISTRATION FAILURE RESOLUTION MAMUN, ABDULLAH AL 2646 §103 Final Rejection 16d Pending Apr 10, 2023
18178485 NETWORK MANAGEMENT FOR MULTI-VENDOR HYBRID QUANTUM-CLASSICAL NETWORKS FEITL, LEAH M 2147 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Mar 03, 2023
17939544 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR QUANTUM AND CLASSICAL NETWORK MANAGEMENT XIA, XUYANG 2143 §103 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Sep 07, 2022
17493712 MINIMIZING ALGORITHMIC BIAS IN MACHINE LEARNING MODELS ALABI, OLUWATOSIN O 2129 §112 Final Rejection 61d Pending Oct 04, 2021
17336573 METHOD OF GENERATING SOLUTIONS FOR COMPLEX BUSINESS PROBLEMS INVOLVING GROUPS OF EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL USING AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL RAHMAN, IBRAHIM 2122 §103 Final Rejection 24d overdue Pending Jun 02, 2021

Managing At&T Mobility Ii LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month