Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/526,278

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 01, 2023
Examiner
BERNSTEIN, ALLISON
Art Unit
2824
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
719 granted / 889 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
904
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
38.0%
-2.0% vs TC avg
§102
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§112
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 889 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending in the application. Information Disclosure Statement Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s Information Disclosure Statement(s) (IDS), Form PTO-1449, filed 18 February 2025. The information therein was considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 11, 13-14 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chen et al. (US 2023/0067140) (hereinafter, “Chen”). Re: independent claim 11, Chen discloses in figs. 2-3 and 4A-4B a memory device, comprising: a memory cell comprising: a programming transistor (310); and a first reading transistor (312) in electrical connection with the programming transistor in series and in electrical connection with a bit line (BL); wherein the memory cell is formed in one of a plurality of first metallization layers (fig. 4A, [0056]) formed over a first surface of a substrate; and wherein the bit line (BL) is formed in one of a plurality of second metallization layers (fig. 4B) formed over a second surface of the substrate opposite to the first surface. Re: claim 13, Chen discloses figs. 2-3 and 4A-4B the memory device of claim 11, wherein each of the programming transistor and the first reading transistor has a semiconductive-behaving material as a channel thereof [0061]. Re: claim 14, Chen discloses figs. 2-3 and 4A-4B the memory device of claim 11, wherein the memory cell further comprises a second reading transistor (322) in electrical connection with the programming transistor (310) and the first reading transistor (312) in series. Re: claim 16, Chen discloses figs. 2-3 and 4A-4B the memory device of claim 14, wherein the second reading transistor (322) is electrically connected between the first reading transistor (312) and the programming transistor (310). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen et al. (US 2023/0067140) (hereinafter, “Chen”) in view of Wu et al. (US 2020/0075610) (hereinafter, “Wu”). Re: claim 15, Chen discloses the memory device of claim 14. Chen does not disclose wherein the programming transistor is electrically connected between the first reading transistor and the second reading transistor. Wu discloses in figs. 1A-1C a programming transistor (MNP0) the is electrically connected between a first reading transistor (MNR0) and a second reading transistor (MNR1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to electrically connect the programming transistor between the first reading transistor and the second reading transistor since it is well within the abilities of one of ordinary skill in the art to determine the relative electrical connections for the programming transistor, the first reading transistor and the second reading transistor for the desired functionality and/or manufacturing method. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 and 17-20 are allowed. Claim 12 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record fails to teach the claimed limitations in combination namely, as recited in independent claim 1, a memory device, comprising: a plurality of peripheral transistors formed along a first surface of a substrate; a plurality of memory cells formed in one or more of a plurality of first metallization layers disposed over the first surface, each of the plurality of memory cells being operatively coupled to a subset of the peripheral transistors and comprising a programming transistor and at least a first reading transistor; and a plurality of second metallization layers disposed over a second surface of the substrate opposite to the first surface; wherein a first source/drain terminal of the programming transistor is in electrical connection with a first source/drain terminal of the first reading transistor, and a second source/drain terminal of the first reading transistor is in electrical connection with a bit line formed in a corresponding one of the second metallization layers; and as recited in independent claim 17, a method for forming memory devices, comprising: forming a plurality of peripheral transistors along a first surface of a substrate; forming a plurality of first metallization layers disposed over the first surface; forming a plurality of memory cells in one or more of the plurality of first metallization layers, wherein each of the plurality of memory cells is operatively coupled to a subset of the peripheral transistors and comprises a programming transistor and at least a reading transistor; forming a plurality of second metallization layers disposed over a second surface of the substrate opposite to the first surface; and coupling a source/drain terminal of the reading transistor of each of the memory cells to a bit line formed in a corresponding one of the second metallization layers. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Chang et al. US 2023/0064751 teach a programming transistor electrically connected between a first reading transistor and a second reading transistor. Chang et al. US 12,075,614 teach a MIM memory cell including a backside bit line. Yang et al. US 2025/0070018 teach anti-fuse cells with backside power rails. Chen et al. US 2025/0070053 teach one-time-programmable memory devices with backside interconnect structures. The examiner has cited particular columns and line numbers in the references as applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the applicant in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner. When responding to this office action, applicants are advised to provide the examiner with the line numbers and page numbers in the application and/or references cited to assist the examiner in locating appropriate paragraphs. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALLISON BERNSTEIN whose telephone number is (571)272-9011. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Richard Elms can be reached on 571-272-1869. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALLISON BERNSTEIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2824 1/26/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 01, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 05, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604676
MEMORY CELL, SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE HAVING THE SAME, AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593624
Resistive random access memory structure and manufacturing method thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593446
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588219
METAL-DOPED SWITCHING DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588179
FLY BITLINE DESIGN FOR PSEUDO TRIPLE PORT MEMORY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+3.2%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 889 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month