Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/527,010

INFRARED IMAGING SENSOR WITH ANTIREFLECTIVE COATED OPTICS FOR FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE DETECTION DEVICE INCLUDING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 01, 2023
Examiner
VU, PHU
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Lindsey Firesense LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
848 granted / 994 resolved
+17.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1024
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
57.3%
+17.3% vs TC avg
§102
34.5%
-5.5% vs TC avg
§112
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 994 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
1Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-15 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by McKenna US 2012/0229283. Regarding claim 1, McKenna teaches an infrared imaging sensor for fire detection comprising: a thermopile (fig. 4 26-29 IR pyroelectric and 30-33 IR thermopile sensor [0030]-[0031]) and an antireflective layer ([0030]-[0031])on a lens of the thermopile and configured to pass infrared radiance in a first range( 4300 nm) corresponding to a fire and block infrared radiance in a second range (4500-7000nm and 0-4200 nm). Regarding claim 2, McKenna teaches the infrared imaging sensor for fire detection of claim 1, comprising a focal plane array (FPA) infrared sensor (26-29 IR pyroelectric and 30-33 IR thermopile sensor are each FPA sensors). Regarding claim 3, McKenna teaches the infrared imaging sensor for fire detection of claim 1, wherein the antireflective layer is configured as a coating on the lens of the thermopile for achieving selective transmission of IR suited for small fires detection at far distances [0030-0031]. Regarding claim 4, McKenna teaches the infrared imaging sensor for fire detection of claim 1, wherein the infrared radiance in the first range corresponds to a wildfire (flame and ember signature [0030]). Regarding claim 5, McKenna teaches the infrared imaging sensor for fire detection of claim 1, wherein the first range is from 2 μm to 5.5 μm (4300 nm falls in this range see [0030]). Regarding claim 6, McKenna teaches the infrared imaging sensor for fire detection of claim 5, wherein the first range is from 4.2 μm to 4.7 μm (4300nm falls in this range see [0030]). Regarding claim 7, McKenna teaches the infrared sensor for fire detection of claim 1, wherein the second range is from 6 μm to 15 μm (4500nm – 7000nm overlaps this range [0030]). Regarding claim 8, McKenna teaches a fire detection device comprising: a housing (fig. 1 shell 11); and at least one infrared imaging sensor (26-29 IR pyroelectric and 30-33 IR thermopile sensor are each FPA sensors) supported by the housing and comprising a thermopile focal plane array (FPA) (26-29 IR pyroelectric and 30-33 IR thermopile sensor are each FPA sensors) with antireflective layers [0031-0031]) on the thermopile lens (Fresnel [0030]-[0031]) configured to pass infrared radiance in a first range corresponding to a fire and block infrared radiance in a second range (see [0030]-[0031]). Regarding claim 9, McKenna teaches the fire detection device of claim 8, wherein the at least one infrared imaging sensor comprises a focal plane array (FPA) infrared sensor (26-29 IR pyroelectric and 30-33 IR thermopile sensor are each FPA sensors). Regarding claim 10, McKenna teaches the fire detection device of claim 8, wherein the antireflective layer is configured as a coating on a lens arranged on the thermopile [0031]. Regarding claim 11, McKenna teaches the fire detection device of claim 8, wherein the infrared radiance in the first range corresponds to a wildfire ([0030] ember and flame is considered a wildfire). Regarding claim 12, McKenna teaches the infrared imaging sensor for fire detection of claim 8, wherein the first range is from 2 μm to 5.5 μm (4300 nm falls in this range see [0030]). Regarding claim 13, McKenna teaches the infrared sensor for fire detection of claim 12, wherein the first range is from 4.2 μm to 4.7 μm (4300 nm falls in this range see [0030]). Regarding claim 14, McKenna teaches the fire detection device of claim 8, wherein the second range is from 6 μm to 15 μm (4500-7000 nm is overlapping with this range [0030]). Regarding claim 15, McKenna teaches the fire detection device of claim 8, wherein the at least one infrared sensor comprises a plurality of infrared imaging sensors (26-29 IR pyroelectric viewing sensors and 30-33 IR thermopile sensors) arranged around a periphery of the housing so as to be configured to detect a fire at any of a plurality of sides of the fire detection device. Regarding claim 18, McKenna teaches the fire detection device of claim 8, further comprising an anemometer to determine local wind speed and a wind direction ([0036]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claim(s) 16 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over McKenna 2012/0229283 in view of Hou US 2009/0315722. Regarding claim 16, McKenna teaches the fire detection device of claim 8, but does not explicitly teach comprising at least one visible camera configured to obtain an image of an area around the fire detection device in response to an output from the at least one infrared imaging sensor. Hou teaches combining a visible camera with IR detection methods to improve accuracy and reduce false alarms [0012]-[0016]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one ordinary skill in the art to modify McKenna in view of Hou to improve accuracy and reduce false alarms. Regarding claim 16, Mckenna teaches the fire detection device of claim 16, wherein the at least one infrared imaging sensor comprises a plurality of infrared sensors ( 26-29 IR pyroelectric viewing sensors and 30-33 IR thermopile sensors) arranged around a periphery of the housing so as to be configured to detect a fire at any of a plurality of sides of the fire detection device but does not teach wherein the at least one visible camera comprises a plurality of cameras arranged around the periphery of the housing so as to be configured to obtain an image at any of the plurality of sides of the fire detection device, and wherein each of the plurality of infrared imaging sensors and the plurality of cameras is arranged as a fixed array. However Hou does teach combining a visible camera with IR detection methods to improve accuracy and reduce false alarms [0012]-[0016]. Implementing plurality of cameras arranged around the periphery of the housing so as to be configured to obtain an image at any of the plurality of sides of the fire detection device, and wherein each of the plurality of infrared imaging sensors and the plurality of cameras is arranged as a fixed array would be obvious as McKenna already implements a fixed array of infrared detection thus complementing this with visible cameras for each direction would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHU VU whose telephone number is (571)272-1562. The examiner can normally be reached 11:00 - 7:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached at 571-272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHU VU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 01, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601960
CONTROL APPARATUS, INTERCHANGEABLE LENS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596217
OPTICAL ELEMENT AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585152
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585081
OPTICAL MODULE AND VIRTUAL REALITY (VR) DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12560841
LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+9.2%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 994 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month