Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/528,235

MIXED MATERIAL

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 04, 2023
Priority
Feb 26, 2021 — JP 2021-030924 +1 more
Examiner
YOUNG, WILLIAM D
Art Unit
1761
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
380 granted / 699 resolved
-10.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
741
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.9%
+5.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 699 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The following Office action concerns Patent Application Number 18/528,235. Claims 1-4 and 6-13 are pending in the application. Claims 6-13 are withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to non-elected species. The applicant’s amendment filed May 26, 2026 has been entered. The previous indication of allowable subject matter is withdrawn in view of the IDS filed March 30, 2026. The restriction requirement as to claims 6-13 is reinstated since the notice of allowable subject has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. § 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Seo et al (US 12,410,180). Seo et al teaches a light emitting device comprising a two electrodes and a light emitting layer and an electron transport layer between the electrodes (col. 12, lines 45-60). The electron transport layer includes two or more compounds (col 43, lines 19-35). One of the compounds has the structure: PNG media_image1.png 108 246 media_image1.png Greyscale (col. 3, line 15), wherein Ar1 includes the structure: PNG media_image2.png 185 181 media_image2.png Greyscale (col. 4, line 45), and wherein R1 and R2 include hydrogen and the substituent: PNG media_image3.png 153 216 media_image3.png Greyscale (col. 3, lines 39-42; col. 5, line 60), wherein Q includes oxygen or sulfur (col. 10, line 60). The above compound satisfies formula (G4-1). A second compound of the electron transport layer includes NBphen, which is heteroaromatic (col. 43, line 61). NBphen has the structure: PNG media_image4.png 184 309 media_image4.png Greyscale (col. 57, line 35). NBphen satisfies formula (G2-1). The examiner submits that selection of the above compounds would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art since Seo et al teaches an electron transport layer comprising each of the recited compounds. Conclusion The applicant's IDS filed after the first action on the merits necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Examiner’s Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to William Young whose telephone number is (571) 270-5078. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 8:30 AM to 5 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew, can be reached at 571-272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000./WILLIAM D YOUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761 June 25, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Jun 20, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 15, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 17, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 26, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707615
COMPOSITE MATERIAL AND SHIELDING AGAINST ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706305
METHOD OF MAKING A CATHODE ACTIVE MATERIAL
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700550
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692361
GRAPHENE-MODIFIED POLYMERIC FOAM AND ARTICLES MADE THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690385
INDOLO[3.2.1-JK]CARBAZOLE-6-CARBONITRILE DERIVATIVES AS BLUE FLUORESCENT EMITTERS FOR USE IN OLEDS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (+15.4%)
2y 11m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 699 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month