Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/529,346

SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 05, 2023
Priority
Dec 21, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0180911
Examiner
PATEL, REEMA
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
996 granted / 1122 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1156
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
61.4%
+21.4% vs TC avg
§102
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1122 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species 1 (encompassing claims 1-13 and 16-20) in the reply filed on 3/31/26 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that there is no serious search burden to examine all species. This is not found persuasive because the different species contain mutually exclusive characteristics (e.g., different shapes, different relative radiuses of R1-R4, different relative sizes of first, second, and third landing regions, etc.) and in that way, a search of different mutually exclusive species would amount to search and examination of more than one invention. Furthermore, Applicant has not stated on the record that the different species are obvious variants of each other. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) was submitted on 12/5/23. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the examiner. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive as it is generic. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 11-13 and 16-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 11 states the ball land has an upper surface “having a circular f” (line 5). The meaning of a “a circular f” is unclear to the examiner. Examiner notes “a circular f” does not appear to be a commonly used term of art within the semiconductor manufacturing arts and the Specification does not further elaborate on its meaning. Claims 11-13 and 16-18 inherit the 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, rejections based on their dependencies on claim 11. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 and 19-20 are allowed. Claim 1 contains allowable subject matter because of the limitation the ball land includes a first land region exposed via the opening, the first land region having a semicircular shape with a first radius; and a second land region integrated with a flat side surface of the first land region and having a semicircular shape with a second radius that is less than the first radius in combination with the other elements of the claim. Claims 2-10 depend on claim 1. Claim 19 contains allowable subject matter because of the limitation a mask layer covering the second surface of the wiring substrate and including an opening configured to expose a portion of the ball land, the ball land including, a first land region exposed via the opening, the first land region including an upper surface having a semicircular shape with a first radius; and a second land region integrated with a flat side surface of the first land region, the second land region including an upper surface having a semicircular shape with a second radius that is less than the first radius in combination with the other elements of the claim. Claim 20 depends on claim 19. The closest prior art is Chung et al. (U.S. 2005/0023683 A1; “Chung”) which discloses a ball land (30, Fig. 2a) having a circular shape ([0037]); and a mask layer (36, Fig. 2a) including an opening configured to expose a portion of the ball land, the ball land including, a first land region (A2, Fig. 2a) exposed via the opening, the first land region including an upper surface having a first radius (R1, Fig. 2a) ([0039]); and a second land region (A1, Fig. 2a) integrated with a flat side surface of the first land region (A2, Fig. 2a), the second land region including an upper surface having a second radius (R3, Fig. 2a) that is less than the first radius (R1, Fig. 2a) ([0039]). Yet, Chung does not disclose the first land region and the second land regions are each in a semicircular shape and these features are not render obvious from the prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REEMA PATEL whose telephone number is (571)270-1436. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine Kim can be reached at (571)272-8458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REEMA PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812 5/12/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 05, 2023
Application Filed
May 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677516
DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING SELF-ALIGNED LEDS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677443
SELF-ALIGNED SUBSTRATE ISOLATION (SASI) OF GATE-ALL-AROUND NANOSHEET FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672522
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF TESTING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672452
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666716
CMOS STRUCTURE, AND FABRICATION METHODS OF FINFET CMOS, FD CMOS AND GAA CMOS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1122 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month