Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/529,753

Media System with Selective Message Output Feature

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 05, 2023
Examiner
CHOU, ALAN S
Art Unit
2451
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Roku Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
478 granted / 636 resolved
+17.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
651
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
§103
48.1%
+8.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 636 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Chu U.S. Patent Application Publication Number 2022/0368994 A1 (hereinafter Chu). As per claims 1, 19, 20, Chu discloses a method comprising: determining that a user is an administrator (see identification of an individual watching the television device with purchase history that qualifies as an administrator as claimed on page 10 section [0085]) of a media-presentation device (see specific user turning on a set top box (STB) device, or media-presentation device as claimed, and being identified with purchase and payment information of administrator on page 21 section [0172]); responsive to determining that the user is an administrator of the media-presentation device, updating user profile data associated with the user to include data indicating that the user is an administrator of the media-presentation device (see updating and building profile of user with facial recognition and tracking user activity on page 2 section [0016]), wherein the user profile data further includes reference data associated with the user (see saving user information to establish a baseline, or reference data as claimed, on information known about the user on page 21 section [0172]); obtaining query data (see receiving user image or sound data from devices on page 2 section [0016]) associated with an unidentified person (see detecting user in proximity to device with image or facial recognition on page 10 section [0086] and see detecting new user enter the room on page 9 section [0077]) located in a presentation area of the media-presentation device (see detecting user in proximity of device on page 10 section [0086] and see user enter the room where display is in use on page 9 section [0077]); determining that there is a threshold extent of similarity (see identifying and validating user with previous user profiles such as the administrator profile, or reference data as claimed, on page 2 section [0016]) between the reference data associated with the user determined to be an administrator and the obtained query data associated with the unidentified person (see validating user with a previous profile on page 2 section [0016]); determining that a notification message associated with the media-presentation device is waiting to be output for presentation (see determining relevant personalized advertisement, or notification message as claimed, is appropriate at the given time on page 2 section [0016] and see determine appropriate content to be played during or after a show on page 6 section [0049] and see advertisement, or notification message as claimed, designed to be played along with or during an advertisement break on page 19 section [0155]); and based at least in part on (i) determining that there is the threshold extent of similarity between the reference data associated with the user determined to be an administrator and the obtained query data associated with the unidentified person (see identifying and validating user with previous user profiles such as the administrator profile, or reference data as claimed, on page 2 section [0016]), and (ii) determining that the notification message associated with the media-presentation device is waiting to be output for presentation (see determining relevant personalized advertisement, or notification message as claimed, is appropriate at the given time on page 2 section [0016] and see determine appropriate content to be played during or after a show on page 6 section [0049] and see advertisement, or notification message as claimed, designed to be played along with or during an advertisement break on page 19 section [0155]), causing the notification message to be output for presentation (see output a content, or notification message as claimed, after the show or concurrently on page 6 section [0049] and see output notification message as advertisement during an advertisement break on page 19 section [0155]). As per claim 2, Chu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein determining that the user is an administrator of the media-presentation device comprises: determining that the user has engaged in an initial configuration process of the media-presentation device (see specific administrator user register with the device and storing preference on page 8 section [0063] and see specific administrator user register with devices with image as identification on page 20 section [0165] and see specific administrator user turn on and register with STB on page 21 section [0172]). As per claim 3, Chu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein determining that the user is an administrator of the media-presentation device comprises: determining that the user provided payment-related data as input to the media-presentation device (see user authentication to verify licensing payments on page 16 section [0136] and see checking for paid content such as subscription or cable service on page 19 section [0156] and see checking user past activity history such as subscription and cable or streaming package on page 18 section [0150] and see user past purchase history and credit card purchase history on page 21 section [0172]). As per claim 4, Chu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein determining that the user is an administrator of the media-presentation device comprises: determining that the user accessed a particular settings section of a user interface of the media-presentation device (see user register and set up user preference on page 8 section [0063] and see user setting up privacy protection setting on page 8 section [0069]). As per claim 5, Chu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein determining that the user is an administrator of the media-presentation device comprises: determining that the user consumed media associated with certain age-related demographics (see verifying user attributes prior to advertisement on page 8 section [0070] and see using age demographics to determine user content on page 9 section [0078]). As per claim 6, Chu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the media-presentation device is configured to have at most one user designated as an administrator of the media-presentation device (see determining a specific user and save and build a specific user profile on page 2 section [0016]). As per claim 7, Chu discloses the method of claim 6, determining that a user associated with a media-presentation device is an administrator of the media-presentation device comprises: determining an administrator confidence score for the user; and determining that the determined administrator confidence score is greater than respective administrator confidence scores of all other users associated with the media-presentation device (see validate user profile with facial recognition on page 2 section [016]). As per claim 8, Chu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the media-presentation device is configured to have multiple users designated as administrators of the media-presentation device (see identifying multiple viewers and build a profile for each user as administrator on page 2 section [0016]). As per claim 9, Chu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the query data comprises visual data associated with the unidentified person (see receiving visual image of a new unidentified person on page 2 section [0016]). As per claim 10, Chu discloses the method of claim 9, wherein the visual data represents a face of the unidentified person (see receiving facial recognition images on a new person on page 2 section [0016]). As per claim 11, Chu discloses the method of claim 9, wherein the visual data represents a seating location of the unidentified person (see receiving activity data of person on page 2 section [0016] and see receiving new user movement or recent activities in the room on page 9 section [0077]). As per claim 12, Chu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the query data comprises audio data associated with the unidentified person (see receiving audio data of a new person on page 2 section [0016]). As per claim 13, Chu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the query data comprises behavior data associated with the unidentified person (see receiving activity data of new person on page 2 section [0016]). As per claim 14, Chu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein causing the notification message to be output for presentation comprises causing the media-presentation device to display the notification message via a display screen component of the media-presentation device (see displaying notification on device such as on smartphone or tablet on page 2 section [0018]). As per claim 15, Chu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein causing the notification message to be output for presentation comprises causing the media-presentation device to cause a separate device connected to the media-presentation device, to display the notification message via a display screen component of the separate device (see display notification on separate output device connected to the set-top box on page 2 section [0018]). As per claim 16, Chu discloses the method of claim 1, further comprising: determining that the notification message has a particular type (see notification content with appropriate placement of indicia of the content or features, or type as claimed, on page 3 section [0030] and see notification type such as advertisement type to be played along with content or played during an advertising break on page 19 section [0155]); and based at least in part on (i) determining that there is the threshold extent of similarity between the reference data associated with the user determined to be an administrator and the obtained query data associated with the unidentified person (see identifying and validating user with previous user profiles such as the administrator profile, or reference data as claimed, on page 2 section [0016]), (ii) determining that the notification message associated with the media-presentation device is waiting to be output for presentation (see determining relevant personalized advertisement, or notification message as claimed, is appropriate at the given time on page 2 section [0016] and see determine appropriate content to be played during or after a show on page 6 section [0049] and see advertisement, or notification message as claimed, designed to be played along with or during an advertisement break on page 19 section [0155]), and (iii) determining that the notification message has a particular type, causing the notification message to be output for presentation (see notification content with appropriate placement of indicia of the content or features, or type as claimed, on page 3 section [0030] and see notification type such as advertisement type to be played along with content or played during an advertising break on page 19 section [0155]). As per claim 17, Chu discloses the method of claim 1, further comprising: determining that the notification message has a particular priority level (see content priority on page 3 section [0030] and see content ranking on page 6 section [0049] and see relevancy ranking and priority for advertisement notification on page 19 section [0160]); and based at least in part on (i) determining that there is the threshold extent of similarity between the reference data associated with the user determined to be an administrator and the obtained query data associated with the unidentified person (see identifying and validating user with previous user profiles such as the administrator profile, or reference data as claimed, on page 2 section [0016]), (ii) determining that the notification message associated with the media-presentation device is waiting to be output for presentation (see determining relevant personalized advertisement, or notification message as claimed, is appropriate at the given time on page 2 section [0016] and see determine appropriate content to be played during or after a show on page 6 section [0049] and see advertisement, or notification message as claimed, designed to be played along with or during an advertisement break on page 19 section [0155]), and (iii) determining that the notification message has a particular priority level, causing the notification message to be output for presentation (see content priority on page 3 section [0030] and see content ranking on page 6 section [0049] and see relevancy ranking and priority for advertisement notification on page 19 section [0160]). As per claim 18, Chu discloses the method of claim 1, further comprising: determining that the unidentified person is the only person in the presentation area (see determining relevant personalized advertisement relevant to only one person, or notification message as claimed, is appropriate at the given time on page 2 section [0016]); and based at least in part on (i) determining that there is the threshold extent of similarity between the reference data associated with the user determined to be an administrator and the obtained query data associated with the unidentified person (see identifying and validating user with previous user profiles such as the administrator profile, or reference data as claimed, on page 2 section [0016]), (ii) determining that the notification message associated with the media-presentation device is waiting to be output for presentation (see determining relevant personalized advertisement, or notification message as claimed, is appropriate at the given time on page 2 section [0016] and see determine appropriate content to be played during or after a show on page 6 section [0049] and see advertisement, or notification message as claimed, designed to be played along with or during an advertisement break on page 19 section [0155]), and (iii) determining that the unidentified person is the only person in the presentation area, causing the notification message to be output for presentation (see determining relevant personalized advertisement relevant to only one person, or notification message as claimed, is appropriate at the given time on page 2 section [0016]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Chu U.S. Patent Application Publication Number 2021/0006866 A1. Interactive programming guide presenting to currently active or nearby set of television viewers (see Abstract). Shang et al. U.S. Patent Application Publication Number 2023/0224266 A1. Mail notification delivery using geo-fencing (see Abstract). Cheung et al. U.S. Patent Number 11,100,330 B1. Determining threshold measure of similarity of target user in captured video data and provider notification (see section [0047]). Hou et al. U.S. Patent Application Publication Number 2025/0119606 A1. Prediction model to provide ancillary content to users (see Abstract). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALAN S CHOU whose telephone number is (571)272-5779. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00-5:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chris L Parry can be reached at (571)272-8328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALAN S CHOU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2451
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 05, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598189
CONTENT COLLABORATION SYSTEM HAVING ACCESS CONTROLS FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO DIGITAL CONTENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598270
GENERATING AND PROVIDING IN-MEETING COACHING FOR VIDEO CALLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596761
Systems and methods for generating and utilizing lookalike Uniform Resource Locators (URLs)
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598224
MOBILE PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKS AND RELATED APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12562992
PROXY STATE SIGNALING FOR NETWORK OPTIMIZATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+13.7%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 636 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month