Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/532,056

TRANSPARENT COMPOSITE ARTICLE WITH ELECTRICALLY-CONDUCTIVE PATTERN

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 07, 2023
Examiner
NORRIS, JEREMY C
Art Unit
2847
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Eastman Kodak Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
840 granted / 973 resolved
+18.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
996
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
40.7%
+0.7% vs TC avg
§102
53.1%
+13.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 973 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 and 12-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2015/0183301 A1 (Diguet). Diguet discloses, referring primarily to figure , a composite article comprising: a transparent polymeric film (20, [0088]); an electrically-conductive, metal-containing pattern disposed on a surface of the transparent polymeric film, wherein the electrically-conductive, metal-containing pattern comprises, in order outwardly from a surface of the transparent polymeric film: a metallic pattern (20) having a first surface facing the transparent polymeric film and an opposing second surface; and a pattern of a catalytic ink (26) disposed over at least a portion of the opposing second surface of the metallic pattern; wherein the transparent polymeric film with the electrically-conductive, metal-containing pattern disposed thereon is sandwiched between two panes of transparent rigid substrates and serves as a transparent laminating film to form the composite article ([0031]) [claim 1], wherein the transparent polymeric film comprises poly(vinyl butyral), poly(ethylene vinyl acetate), or an ionomeric polymer ([0029]) [claim 2], further comprising a second transparent polymeric film (22) that is sandwiched between one of the two panes of transparent rigid substrates and a third pane of a transparent rigid substrate to serve as a second transparent laminating film ([0031]) [claim 3], wherein the two panes of transparent rigid substrates are two panes of the same or different glasses or polycarbonates ([0031]) [claim 4], wherein the second transparent laminating film comprises poly(vinyl butyral) film, poly(ethylene vinyl acetate) film, or an ionomeric polymer ([0031]), wherein the catalytic ink pattern is non-conductive ([0046]-[0047]) [claim 6], wherein the catalytic pattern comprises silver nanoparticles ([0035]-[0036]) [claim 7], wherein the metallic pattern comprises copper, gold, aluminum, silver, or platinum, or a combination of two or more of these metals ([0035]) [claim 8], wherein the metallic pattern comprises a plurality of features that can be spaced apart or connected ([0179]) [claim 9], comprising two or more of the same or different electrically-conductive metal-containing patterns, each sandwiched between the two panes of transparent rigid substrates ([0094]) [claim 10], that is a vehicle windshield and the electrically-conductive metal-containing pattern is an antenna pattern ([0004]) [claim 12], having an optical transparency of at least 50% (Table 1) [claim 13], further comprising a first agent (32) that is disposed on and substantially conforming to the first surface of the metallic pattern, forming a darkened surface on the metallic pattern [claim 14], further comprising a second darkening agent (25) being disposed over at least a portion of the opposing second surface of the metallic pattern, forming a second darkened surface on the metallic pattern [claim 15], wherein the transparent rigid substrates are composed of the same or different glass ([0031]) [claim 16], wherein the transparent rigid substrates are composed of the same or different glass ([0031]) [claim 17]. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 11 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 11 states the limitation “wherein the transparent polymeric film comprises poly(vinyl butyral).” This limitation, in conjunction with the other claimed features, was neither found to be disclosed in, nor suggested by the prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEREMY C NORRIS whose telephone number is (571)272-1932. The examiner can normally be reached 7:15-15:15 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Thompson can be reached at (571)272-2342. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JEREMY C. NORRIS Examiner Art Unit 2847 /JEREMY C NORRIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 07, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604416
LAMINATE FOR WIRING BOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604411
FLEXIBLE PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD, IN PARTICULAR FOR CONNECTING ELECTRICAL AND/OR ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598703
WIRING CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598698
WIRING CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598693
THICK FILM PRINTED COOLER FOR IMPROVED THERMAL MANAGEMENT OF DIRECT BONDED POWER DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+4.4%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 973 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month