Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/532,505

LAMINATE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING LAMINATE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 07, 2023
Examiner
GREEN, TELLY D
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Meijo University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
1044 granted / 1280 resolved
+13.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1328
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
54.2%
+14.2% vs TC avg
§102
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1280 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han (US 2016/0017515 A1) as evidenced by or in view of Brookhyser et al. (Brookhyser) (US 2022/0048135 A1), Riechel et al. (Riechel) (US 2021/0362277 A1) or Neufeld et al. (Neufeld) (US 2021/0346985 A1). In regards to claim 1, Han (Figs. 4A-4C and associated text) discloses a laminate comprising: an amorphous glass substrate (item 418, paragraphs 9, 10, 17, 37, 45); and an AlN layer (item 416) formed on the amorphous glass substrate (item 418), wherein the AlN layer (item 416) is c-axis oriented (paragraph 52) on the amorphous glass substrate (item 418), but does not specifically disclose a glass transition temperature (Tg) of the amorphous glass substrate is 720° C. to 810° C., a coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the amorphous glass substrate is 3.5×10.sup.−6 [1/K] to 4.0×10.sup.−6 [1/K], and a softening point of the amorphous glass substrate is 950° C. to 1050° C. As evidence by Brookhyser (paragraph 40), Riechel (paragraph 36) and/or Neufeld (paragraph 30), the amorphous substrate/amorphous glass substrate can be semiconductor or optical device substrate materials (e.g., Al.sub.2O.sub.3, AlN, BeO, Cu, GaAS, GaN, Ge, InP, Si, SiO2, SiC, Si1−xGex (where 0.0001<x<0.9999), or the like, or any combination or alloy thereof), glass (e.g., fused quartz, soda-lime-silica glass, sodium borosilicate glass, lead oxide glass, aluminosilicate glass, germanium oxide glass, aluminate glass, phosphate glass, borate glass, chalcogenide glass, amorphous metal, or the like or any combination thereof), sapphire, polymeric materials (e.g., polyamide, polyimide, polyester, polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyacetal, polycarbonate, modified polyphenylene ether, polybutylene terephthalate, polyphenylene sulfide, polyether sulfone, polyether imide, polyether ether ketone, liquid crystal polymer, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, or any compound, composite or alloy thereof), leather, paper, build-up materials (e.g., AJINOMOTO Build-up Film, also known as “ABF”, etc.), solder resist, or the like or any composite, laminate, or other combination thereof. Examiner notes that it is well known in the art that aluminosilicate glass has a glass transition temperature (Tg) between 600° C. to 800° C, a coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of around 3.0×10.sup.−6 [1/K] to 4.2×10.sup.−6 [1/K] and a softening point ranging from 725° C. to over 900° C. Therefore Han as evidenced and/or modified by Brookhyser, Riechel or Neufeld discloses a glass transition temperature (Tg) of the amorphous glass substrate is 720° C. to 810° C., a coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the amorphous glass substrate is 3.5×10.sup.−6 [1/K] to 4.0×10.sup.−6 [1/K], and a softening point of the amorphous glass substrate is 950° C. to 1050° C. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate aluminosilicate glass substrate as taught by Brookhyser, Riechel or Neufeld for the purpose of high maximum working temperatures. 2. The laminate according to claim 1, wherein an arithmetic mean roughness (Ra) on a surface of the amorphous glass substrate is equal to or less than 3 nm. In regards to claim 3, Han (paragraph 48, Figs. 4A-4C and associated text) as evidenced and/or modified by Brookhyser, Riechel or Neufeld discloses wherein the amorphous glass substrate (item 418) has a local Si—O crystal structure. In regards to claim 4, Han (paragraph 48, Figs. 4A-4C and associated text) as evidenced and/or modified by Brookhyser, Riechel or Neufeld discloses wherein the AlN layer (item 416) is a thin film deposited and formed on the amorphous glass substrate (item 418). In regards to claim 5, Han (paragraph 48, Figs. 4A-4C and associated text) as evidenced and/or modified by Brookhyser, Riechel or Neufeld discloses wherein the AlN layer (item 416) is deposited and formed on the amorphous glass substrate at a deposition temperature of 400° C. to 600° C. The method of forming a device is not germane to the issue of patentability of the device itself. Therefore, this limitation has not been given patentable weight. In regards to claim 6, Han (paragraph 48, Figs. 4A-4C and associated text) as evidenced and/or modified by Brookhyser, Riechel or Neufeld does not specifically disclose wherein a film thickness of the AlN layer is 20 nm to 400 nm. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the invention to include a film thickness of the AlN layer being 20 nm to 400 nm, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art (In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980)). Examiner notes that the Applicant has not given any criticality as to where any value within the claimed range yields and advantageous or unexpected result. In regards to claim 7, Han (paragraph 48, Figs. 4A-4C and associated text) as evidenced and/or modified by Brookhyser, Riechel or Neufeld discloses wherein the AlN layer (item 416) is in direct contact with the amorphous glass substrate (item 418). In regards to claim 8, Han (paragraph 48, Figs. 4A-4C and associated text) as evidenced and/or modified by Brookhyser, Riechel or Neufeld discloses wherein a thickness of the amorphous glass substrate (item 418) is 0.4 mm to 1.0 mm (paragraph 69). Claim(s) 9-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han (US 2016/0017515 A1) as evidenced by or in view of Brookhyser et al. (Brookhyser) (US 2022/0048135 A1), Riechel et al. (Riechel) (US 2021/0362277 A1) or Neufeld et al. (Neufeld) (US 2021/0346985 A1) in view of Henn et al. (Henn) (US 2015/0355382 A1). In regards to claim 9, Han (Figs. 4A-4C and associated text) discloses a method of manufacturing a laminate, the method comprising: preparing an amorphous glass substrate (item 418) having a glass transition temperature (Tg) of 720° C. to 810° C., a coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of 3.5×10.sup.−6 [1/K] to 4.0×10.sup.−6 [1/K], and a softening point of 950° C. to 1050° C.; and forming an AlN layer (item 416) on the amorphous glass substrate (item 418), but does not specifically disclose preparing an amorphous glass substrate having a glass transition temperature (Tg) of 720° C. to 810° C., a coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of 3.5×10.sup.−6 [1/K] to 4.0×10.sup.−6 [1/K], and a softening point of 950° C. to 1050° C. As evidence by Brookhyser (paragraph 40), Riechel (paragraph 36) and/or Neufeld (paragraph 30), the amorphous substrate/amorphous glass substrate can be semiconductor or optical device substrate materials (e.g., Al.sub.2O.sub.3, AlN, BeO, Cu, GaAS, GaN, Ge, InP, Si, SiO2, SiC, Si1−xGex (where 0.0001<x<0.9999), or the like, or any combination or alloy thereof), glass (e.g., fused quartz, soda-lime-silica glass, sodium borosilicate glass, lead oxide glass, aluminosilicate glass, germanium oxide glass, aluminate glass, phosphate glass, borate glass, chalcogenide glass, amorphous metal, or the like or any combination thereof), sapphire, polymeric materials (e.g., polyamide, polyimide, polyester, polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyacetal, polycarbonate, modified polyphenylene ether, polybutylene terephthalate, polyphenylene sulfide, polyether sulfone, polyether imide, polyether ether ketone, liquid crystal polymer, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, or any compound, composite or alloy thereof), leather, paper, build-up materials (e.g., AJINOMOTO Build-up Film, also known as “ABF”, etc.), solder resist, or the like or any composite, laminate, or other combination thereof. Examiner notes that it is well known in the art that aluminosilicate glass has a glass transition temperature (Tg) between 600° C. to 800° C, a coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of around 3.0×10.sup.−6 [1/K] to 4.2×10.sup.−6 [1/K] and a softening point ranging from 725° C. to over 900° C. Therefore Han as evidenced and/or modified by Brookhyser, Riechel or Neufeld discloses a glass transition temperature (Tg) of the amorphous glass substrate is 720° C. to 810° C., a coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the amorphous glass substrate is 3.5×10.sup.−6 [1/K] to 4.0×10.sup.−6 [1/K], and a softening point of the amorphous glass substrate is 950° C. to 1050° C. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate aluminosilicate glass substrate as taught by Brookhyser, Riechel or Neufeld for the purpose of high maximum working temperatures. Han as evidenced and/or modified by Brookhyser, Riechel or Neufeld does not specifically disclose forming an AlN layer on the amorphous glass substrate at a deposition temperature of 400° C. to 600° C. Henn (paragraphs 42, 64, 71,72) discloses forming an AlN layer on the amorphous glass substrate at a deposition temperature of 400° C. to 600° C (paragraph 72, preferably temperatures above 300° C). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate aluminosilicate glass substrate as taught by Henn for the purpose of a preferred orientation of the crystal structure can be influenced in a particularly advantageous manner (paragraph 72). In regards to claim 10, Han (paragraph 48, Figs. 4A-4C and associated text) as evidenced and/or modified by Brookhyser, Riechel or Neufeld does wherein, at the forming, the AlN layer (item 416) is c-axis oriented on the amorphous glass substrate (item 418), but does not specifically disclose the AlN layer is deposited and formed with a film thickness of 20 nm to 400 nm. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the invention to include a film thickness of the AlN layer being 20 nm to 400 nm, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art (In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980)). Examiner notes that the Applicant has not given any criticality as to where any value within the claimed range yields and advantageous or unexpected result. In regards to claim 11, Han (Figs. 4A-4C and associated text) as evidenced and/or modified by Brookhyser, Riechel or Neufeld discloses wherein the AlN layer (item 416) is deposited on the amorphous glass substrate (item 418) by sputtering (paragraphs 28, 46, 52, 54., 56, 59, 77). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TELLY D GREEN whose telephone number is (571)270-3204. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Manno can be reached at 571-272-2339. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. TELLY D. GREEN Examiner Art Unit 2898 /TELLY D GREEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898 February 4, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 07, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599036
Circuit Architecture in Multi-Dimensional Monolithic Structure
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12599037
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12599022
APPARATUS FOR APPLYING A SINTERING FORCE VIA A COMPRESSIBLE FILM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593439
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE HAVING SEMICONDUCTOR CHANNEL LAYER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588276
Logic Cell Structure with Diffusion Box
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+3.7%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1280 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month