Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/533,049

ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 07, 2023
Priority
Aug 09, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0104451
Examiner
VU, HUNG K
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
879 granted / 1004 resolved
+19.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1035
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
43.6%
+3.6% vs TC avg
§102
37.2%
-2.8% vs TC avg
§112
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1004 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention of Group I, Claims 1-8, in the reply filed on 05/07/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 9-15 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 05/07/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, line 14, the recitation of “apply the green sub-pixel to the second green data value” is unclear because the second green data value should be applied to the green sub-pixel instead. In claim 1, line 15, the recitation of “apply the blue sub-pixel to the second blue data value” is unclear because the second blue data value should be applied to the blue sub-pixel instead. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cok et al. (US 2010/0013748). Regarding claim 1, Cok et al. discloses, as shown in Figures 2-5, an organic light emitting diode (OLED) display device comprising: a display panel (10, [0038]) configured to display an image and includes a plurality of pixels, wherein each of the plurality of pixels (15) including a red sub-pixel (20R, [0038], Fig. 2), a green sub-pixel (20G, [0038], Fig. 2), a blue sub-pixel (20B, [0038], Fig. 2), and a white sub-pixel (20W, [0038], Fig. 2); and a processor (25, [0038]) configured to: obtain a first red data value (205, [0066]-[0067], Fig. 5), a first green data value (205, [0066]-[0067], Fig. 5), and a first blue data value (205, [0066]-[0067], Fig. 5) based on the image; select one among a plurality of data combinations for a pixel having the same brightness and color as the image (210, [0066], Fig. 5); convert each of the first red data value, the first green data value, and the first blue data value into a second red data value (220, [0067], Fig. 5), a second green data value (220, [0067], Fig. 5), a second blue data value (220, [0067], Fig. 5), and a first white data value (220, [0067], Fig. 5) corresponding to the data combination; apply (240, [0069], Fig. 5) the second red data value (220, [0067], Fig. 5) to the red sub-pixel (20R, [0038]); apply the second green data value (220, [0067] , Fig. 5) to the green sub-pixel (20G, [0038]); apply the second blue data value (220, [0067], Fig. 5) to the blue sub-pixel (20B, [0038]); and apply the first white data value (220, [0067], Fig. 5) to the white sub-pixel (20W, [0038]). Regarding claim 2, Cok et al. discloses the processor is further configured to: obtain a first cumulative light emission time (215, [0066]-[0067]) of the red sub-pixel (20R), a second cumulative light emission time (215, [0066]-[0067]) of the green sub-pixel (20G), a third cumulative light emission time (215, [0066]-[0067]) of the blue sub-pixel (20B), and a fourth cumulative light emission time (215, [0066]-[0067]) of the white sub-pixel (20W); and select a data (225, [0068]-[0069]) combination based on the first accumulated light emission time, the second accumulated light emission time, the third accumulated light emission time, and the fourth accumulated light emission time. Regarding claim 3, Cok et al. discloses the processor is configured to: select the data combination (245, 250, 255, [0070]-[0076], Fig. 5) to increase the brightness of a sub-pixel having the smallest cumulative light emission time among the first cumulative light emission time, the second accumulated light emission time, the third accumulated light emission time, and the fourth accumulated light emission time. Regarding claim 4, Cok et al. discloses the processor is configured to: select the data combination (245, 250, 255, [0070]-[0076], Fig. 5) to reduce the brightness of a sub-pixel having the largest accumulated light emission time among the first cumulative light emission time, the second accumulated light emission time, the third accumulated light emission time, and the fourth accumulated light emission time. Regarding claim 5, Cok et al. discloses the processor is further configured to: calculate difference values (245, 250, 255, [0070]-[0076], Fig. 5) between two cumulative light emission times among the first cumulative light emission time, the second cumulative light emission time, the third cumulative light emission time, and the fourth cumulative light emission time; select the data combination such that a sum of the difference values is minimized. Regarding claim 6, Cok et al. discloses the processor is further configured to: calculate a difference value (245, 250, 255, [0070]-[0076], Fig. 5) between two cumulative light emission times among the first cumulative light emission time, the second cumulative light emission time, the third cumulative light emission time, and the fourth cumulative light emission time; select the data combination to reduce the difference value to less than the predetermined value if the calculated difference value is greater than or equal to the predetermined value. Regarding claim 7, Cok et al. discloses the processor is further configured to: randomly, select any one of the plurality of data combinations (245, 250, 255, [0070]-[0076], Fig. 5). Regarding claim 8, Cok et al. discloses the display panel is configured to display a still image and a background image, the processor is configured to select the data combination such that the brightness of sub-pixel becomes smooth from the pixel of the still image to the pixel of the background image (245, 250, 255, [0070]-[0076], Fig. 5). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HUNG K VU whose telephone number is (571)272-1666. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 7am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JACOB CHOI can be reached at (469) 295-9060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HUNG K VU/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 07, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707631
DAMASCENE DIGIT LINES
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702064
POWER DISTRIBUTION FOR STACKED ELECTRONIC DEVICES
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12690483
Semiconductor Chip Package Having Internal I/O Structures With Modulated Thickness To Compensate For Die/Substrate Warpage
4y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12685171
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE WITH EXTENDED STIFFENER
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12685203
BUMP INTEGRATION WITH REDISTRIBUTION LAYER
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.4%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1004 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month