Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/534,071

HIGH-TEMPERATURE IMPLANT FOR GATE-ALL-AROUND DEVICES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 08, 2023
Examiner
LEE, KYOUNG
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Applied Materials, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allow Rate
912 granted / 979 resolved
+25.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1002
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
§102
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§112
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 979 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 15-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hatem et al. (US Patent No. 9,589,802). [Re claim 15] Hatem discloses the system, comprising: one or more process chamber operable to: deposition chamber (510); etching chamber (506); and an ion processing tool (508) within the one or more chambers (see figure 5 and column 9 line 7-64). The limitation “form a gate-all-around (GAA) stack comprising a plurality of alternating first layers and second layers, wherein the GAA stack is positioned atop a bottom dielectric isolation (BDI) layer; form a source/drain (S/D) cavity by etching the plurality of alternating first layers and second layers; and form an inner spacer in the S/D cavity, adjacent the plurality of alternating first layers and second layers; and an ion processing, wherein the ion processing to perform an implant by directing ions to the GAA stack, through the S/D cavity, wherein the implant is performed at a temperature greater than 5000 Celsius, and wherein a S/D material is formed in the S/D cavity following the implant” are limitations directed to details of the device being made by the claimed apparatus, and therefore do not impart significant patentable weight. See MPEP 2114(II). [Re claim 16] Hatem discloses the system wherein the ion processing tool (508) (see column 9 lines 33-48). The limitation “operable to direct the ions into the inner spacer and into the first layers of the plurality of alternating first layers and second layers” are limitations directed to details of the device being made by the claimed apparatus, and therefore do not impart significant patentable weight. See MPEP 2114(II). [Re claim 17] Hatem discloses the system wherein the ion processing tool is beamline tool (508) (see column 9 lines 33-48). The limitation “operable to direct the ions into the GAA stack at a non-zero angle relative to a plane defined by a sidewall surface of the inner spacer, and wherein the ions are boron ions” are limitations directed to details of the device being made by the claimed apparatus, and therefore do not impart significant patentable weight. See MPEP 2114(II). [Re claim 18] Hatem discloses the system wherein the ion processing tool is a plasma doping tool operable to perform a plasma doping process (508) (see column 9 lines 33-48). [Re claim 19] Hatem discloses the system wherein the ion processing tool (508) (see column 9 lines 49-64). The limitation “operable to direct the ions to the GAA stack before or after formation of the BDI layer” are limitations directed to details of the device being made by the claimed apparatus, and therefore do not impart significant patentable weight. See MPEP 2114(II). [Re claim 20] Hatem discloses the system comprising deposition chamber (510) operable to form one or more of silicon oxide, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, or a high-k material (see column 9 lines 49-64). The limitation “the BDI layer comprises one or more of silicon oxide, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, or a high-k material” are limitations directed to details of the device being made by the claimed apparatus, and therefore do not impart significant patentable weight. See MPEP 2114(II). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1-14 are allowed. The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: Claim 1 allowable because of the closest prior art (US Patent No 9,923,055) discloses the method of forming a gate-all-around (GAA) stack comprising a plurality of alternating first layers and second layers (106), wherein the GAA stack is positioned atop a bottom dielectric isolation (BDI) layer; forming a source/drain (S/D) cavity by etching the plurality of alternating first layers and second layers; forming an inner spacer (702/1102) in the S/D cavity, adjacent the plurality of alternating first layers and second layers; forming a S/D material (1202) in the S/D cavity and implanting the S/D material after forming the S/D material (see figure 1A-12 and column 7 line 53 through column 11 line 43). However, the closest prior art, either singly or in combination, fails to anticipate or render obvious, the method, the step of performing an implant by directing ions to the GAA stack, through the S/D cavity, wherein the implant is performed at a temperature greater than 500° Celsius; and forming a S/D material in the S/D cavity following the implant. These features in combination with the other elements of the claim are neither disclosed nor suggested by the prior art of record. The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: Claim 8 allowable because of the closest prior art (US Patent No 10,825,904) discloses the method of forming a gate-all-around (GAA) device, comprising: forming a nanowire stack atop a bottom dielectric isolation (BDI) layer, the nanowire stack comprising: a plurality of alternating first layers and second layers; and an outer gate spacer adjacent the plurality of alternating first layers and second layers; forming a source/drain (S/D) cavity by etching the plurality of alternating first layers and second layers, and by etching an outer gate spacer located adjacent the nanowire stack; forming an inner spacer in the S/D cavity, adjacent the plurality of alternating first layers and second layers (see figure 1A-12 and column 7 line 53 through column 11 line 43). However, the closest prior art, either singly or in combination, fails to anticipate or render obvious, the method, the step of performing an implant by directing ions to the inner spacer, through the S/D cavity, wherein the implant is performed at a temperature greater than 500° Celsius; and forming a S/D material in the S/D cavity following the implant. These features in combination with the other elements of the claim are neither disclosed nor suggested by the prior art of record. Claims 2-7 and 8-14 depend from claim 1 or 8 so they are allowable for the same reason. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure: Cheng et al. (US Patent No. 9,923,055). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KYOUNG LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1982. The examiner can normally be reached M to F, 10am to 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eliseo Ramos-Feliciano can be reached at (571)272-7925. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KYOUNG LEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 08, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598893
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12599023
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593601
DISPLAY PANEL AND MOBILE TERMINAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581836
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581819
DISPLAY PANEL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+4.9%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 979 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month