Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/536,227

VEHICLE INSTRUMENT PANEL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 12, 2023
Priority
Feb 08, 2023 — JP 2023-017937
Examiner
LEMBO, AARON LLOYD
Art Unit
3672
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
674 granted / 832 resolved
+29.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
854
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
79.8%
+39.8% vs TC avg
§102
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 832 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable by Nakada (JP 2002052548). As concerns claim 1, Nakada (JP 2002052548) discloses a vehicle instrument panel, comprising: a base material (12) extending in a vehicle width direction, at a front part of a vehicle cabin interior of a vehicle; a skin (14, 16) provided with a pair of skin materials, each of the skin materials having an end part thereof joined together at a skin joining part, and the skin forming a design face at the vehicle cabin interior; and a cushion part (18) provided between the base material and the skin and formed of a foamed resin, wherein the base material is provided with a rib (38) at a position facing the skin joining part of the skin. (See at least Figures 1 and 4-7) PNG media_image1.png 499 701 media_image1.png Greyscale As concerns claim 5, Nakada discloses a method of manufacturing a vehicle instrument panel, the method comprising: molding a skin (14, 16) having a pair of skin materials each having an end part thereof joined together at a skin joining part; molding a base material (12) provided with a plurality of ribs (38; see Figure 4) at positions corresponding to the skin joining part; setting the base material in one die and setting the skin in another die, and closing the one die and the other die; and molding a cushion part (18) by injecting a foaming crude liquid between the base material and the skin. (See at least Figures 1 and 4-7) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakada in view of Matsumoto et al (US 6,328,924). As concerns claim 4, Nakada discloses the vehicle instrument panel of claim 1, wherein at least one skin material of the pair of skin materials is configured by polyethelyne or polypropelene. Nakada fails to specify the use of PVC. Matsumoto et al (US 6,328,924) however teaches wherein at least one skin material of an instrument panel is configured by polyvinyl chloride for the purpose of providing a stronger, integral style of construction of the skin to the foam core beneath. (At least Column 2, Line 26 to Column 3, Line 4, and Column 4, Lines 30-36) Therefore, it would have been obvious to modify Nakada as taught by Matsumoto to include the PVC-based skin for the expected benefit of providing a more integrally laminated instrument panel, to obtain the invention as specified in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-3 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As concerns claim 2, prior art reference Nakada discloses the claimed base material, and wherein a foaming crude liquid of the foamed resin configuring the cushion part is injected from the base material toward the rib part. (At least the Abstract) Nakada however fails to specify or anticipate the separate upper part, lower part and concave parts as claimed in combination. Neither Nakada nor any additionally cited art of record teaches or fairly suggests, alone or in combination, inter alia, wherein a vehicle instrument panel would comprise a base material as claimed in claim 2, comprising the upper part, lower part and concave part. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AARON L LEMBO whose telephone number is (571)270-3065. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Coy can be reached on (571) 272-5405. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AARON L LEMBO/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12629994
VEHICLE DOOR
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630223
VEHICLE REAR STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624619
DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR GAS LIFT GAS
1y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617326
VEHICLE SEAT COMPONENT INCLUDING INTEGRATED ASSIST HANDLE
2y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12611991
CARGO DECK FOR VEHICLE INTERIOR
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+13.3%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 832 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month