Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/541,146

PROBE CARD STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 15, 2023
Examiner
VELEZ, ROBERTO
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Star Technologies Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
173 granted / 260 resolved
-1.5% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
281
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.5%
+12.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 260 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see remarks (pages 1-2), filed 02/03/2026, with respect to claims 1-2 and 7-12 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The prior art rejection of claims 1-2 and 7-12 has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2 and 7-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, lines 19-21 recite “at least one signal probe, the at least one signal probe correspondingly passing through one part of the first quantity of the first guide plate through holes and one part of the first quantity of the second guide plate through holes” and lines 25-27 recite “at least one ground probe, the at least one ground probe correspondingly passing through another part of the first quantity of the first guide plate through holes and another part of the first quantity of the second guide plate through holes”. Also, lines 48-52 recite “wherein the at least one signal probe correspondingly passes through one part of the second quantity of the first guide plate through holes and one part of the second quantity of the second guide plate through holes, the at least one ground probe correspondingly passes through another part of the second quantity of the first guide plate through holes and another part of the second quantity of the second guide plate through holes”. It is not clear if the claim refers to the same signal probe and ground probe that passes through the first quantity of the first guide plate and second guide plate through holes or a different one, for example “another signal probe from the at least one signal probe”. The remaining claim language in claim 1 and the dependent claims should be clear and consistent when identifying which “signal probe” and “ground probe” is being referred to. For examination purposed, it is going to be assumed that an additional and different signal probe and ground probe is being claimed in the second quantity of the first guide plate through holes and the second quantity of the second guide plate through holes. Claims 2 and 7-12 depending from claim 1 are being rejected for the same reasons. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 2 and 7-12 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, the prior art fails to specifically teach a probe card structure, comprising: wherein the plurality of first guide plate through holes have a second quantity of the first guide plate through holes and the plurality of second guide plate through holes have a second quantity of the second guide plate through holes, and the second quantity of the first guide plate through holes corresponds to the second quantity of the second guide plate through holes, wherein a sum of the first quantity of the first guide plate through holes and the second quantity of the first guide plate through holes is less than or equal to a total quantity of the plurality of first guide plate through holes, a sum of the first quantity of the second guide plate through holes and the second quantity of the second guide plate through holes is less than or equal to a total quantity of the plurality of second guide plate through holes; wherein the second quantity of the first guide plate through holes defines a first guide plate second area of the at least one first guide plate, the second quantity of the second guide plate through holes defines a second guide plate second area of the at least one second guide plate, and at least one of the first guide plate second area and the second guide plate second area is plated with the guide plate conductive film: wherein the at least one signal probe correspondingly passes through one part of the second quantity of the first guide plate through holes and one part of the second quantity of the second guide plate through holes, the at least one ground probe correspondingly passes through another part of the second quantity of the first guide plate through holes and another part of the second quantity of the second guide plate through holes: wherein the at least one ground probe of the first guide plate first area and the probe conductive film of the at least one signal probe are electrically connected to each other the at least one ground probe of the first guide plate second area and the probe conductive film of the at least one signal probe are electrically connected to each other the at least one ground probe of the second guide plate first area and the probe conductive film of the at least one signal probe are electrically connected to each other the at least one ground probe of the second guide plate second area and the probe conductive film of the at least one signal probe are electrically connected to each other; wherein the contact elements included in the first guide plate first area are correspondingly insulated from the contact elements included in the first guide plate second area; and wherein the contact elements included in the second guide plate first area are correspondingly insulated from the contact elements included in the second guide plate second area, in combination with all the limitations of the claim. Claims 2 and 7-12 depending from claim 1, or any other dependent claim, are allowed for the same reasons in combination with the limitations of their dependency. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. SHUTO (US PGPUB 2022/0074971) teaches an electrical connecting device. Kawata et al. (US PGPUB 2013/0065455) teaches a contact holder. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERTO VELEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-8597. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 5:30am-3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Huy Phan can be reached at (571)272-7924. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERTO VELEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 15, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 23, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 06, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Jan 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 03, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12584950
POSITIONING APPARATUS FOR POSITIONING A DEVICE UNDER TEST
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578407
ULTRA-FAST ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING WITH NARROW-BAND VELOCITY-SELECTIVE (NB-VS) LABELING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578377
GATE STRESS TEST ARCHITECTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578290
FIRST HALF ECHO INCLUSION IN NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE DATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12566233
CALIBRATION SYSTEM AND CALIBRATION METHOD FOR A VECTOR NETWORK ANALYZER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+21.6%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 260 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month