Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/541,717

CABLE HOLDER FOR A VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 15, 2023
Examiner
MILLNER, MONICA E
Art Unit
3632
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Oshkosh Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
873 granted / 1125 resolved
+25.6% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1154
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
39.9%
-0.1% vs TC avg
§102
31.3%
-8.7% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1125 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/13/26 has been entered. Response to Amendment Claim 1 is amended. Claim 6 is cancelled. Claims 10-20 are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-9 and 21-25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 4,373,463 to Beaudette in view of US 6,712,379 to Graham et al. and US 10,126,334 to Sugar. Regarding claim 1, Beaudette '463 discloses a cable holder 15 for supporting a cable of a vehicle 12, the cable holder comprising: a body portion 16 defining an engagement surface and a plurality of holes 20; a first hook 18, a second hook 17b, and a third hook 17, wherein the first hook and the third hook extend from a first lateral side of the body portion toward a center of the body portion and the second hook 17b extends from a second lateral side of the body portion toward the center of the body portion (figs 2 and 4), wherein the first hook 18, the second hook 17b, and the third hook 17 each define a curved engagement surface (figs. 4-5), and wherein the first hook, the second hook, and the third hook are aligned along a longitudinal axis of the body portion such that the engagement surfaces of the first hook and the third hook engage a first side of the cable (fig. 2, 4, 5) and the engagement surface of the second hook 17b engages a second side of the cable opposite the first side (fig 5); wherein the first hook, the second hook, and the third hook are configured to receive the cable to removably couple the cable with the cable holder by engaging an exterior surface of the cable at the curved engagement surface (figs 2 and 5); wherein the body portion 16 engages the exterior surface of the cable at the engagement surface (figs 2 and 5). Beaudette '463 is silent as to the material of the cable device and the hooks of the vehicle cable device. However, it is known to use cable devices of flexible material in order to securely hold and release the cable in an easy and user friendly manner. For example, Graham '379 teaches a cable device having a number of hooks 12/14, wherein the first hook, the second hook, and the third hook are manufactured from a flexible material such that the cable breaks away from the cable holder when a first force is exerted on the cable to pull the cable away from the cable holder without transferring a second force to a component of the vehicle that the cable holder is coupled to (col. 4, lines 43-44 - " such as devices manufactured from Kevlar fiberglass, etc.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the hooks taught in Beaudette '463 with the flexible hooks taught in Graham '379 in order to securely hold and release the cable in an easy and user friendly manner via the flexible hooks. Further, it is well known and practiced in the art to include sensors to detect various parameters of clamps and holding devices. For example, Sugar ‘334 teaches a sensor 34 configured to detect a characteristic of the cable to determine whether the cable is coupled with the cable holder 30 (col. 2, line 61 to col. 3, line 7 – “… magnetic sensors 34 are used to provide readings…”; col. 3, line 49-55 – “… magnetic field outside of the cable as seen by the sensors…”; & col. 11, lines 52-67). Noting that a sensor providing readings and detecting the magnetic field of an attached cable is a clear indication that the cable is coupled to the cable holder. Again, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the cable holder taught in Beaudette '463 further with the sensor(s) as taught in Sugar ‘334 in order to detect characteristic of the cable held by the holder device, as well-known and practiced in the art. Noting that the sensor can only detect characteristic of the cable when the cable is held by the clamp which is now modified with a sensor(s). Regarding claim 2, Beaudette '463, as modified, discloses, wherein the plurality of holes 20 are positioned on the body portion 16 such that fasteners of the plurality of holes are accessible when the cable is engaged by the first hook, the second hook, the third hook, and the body portion (fig. 2). Regarding claim 3, Beaudette '463, as modified, discloses, wherein the cable holder is configured to support a charging cable (col. 2, lines 20-30 - " cables made of multiple components such as plastic coated wire..."). Regarding claim 4, Beaudette '463, as modified, discloses, wherein the first hook, the second hook, and the third hook, are evenly spaced along a longitudinal length of the body portion (fig. 2). Regarding claim 5, Beaudette '463, as modified, discloses, wherein the first hook, the second hook, and the third hook are integrally formed with the body portion (fig. 3). Regarding claim 7, Beaudette '463, as modified, discloses, further comprising: a fourth hook 17a, wherein the fourth hook 17a extends from the second lateral side of the body portion toward a center of the cable holder, and wherein the fourth hook defines a curved engagement surface. Regarding claim 8, Beaudette '463, as modified, discloses, wherein the fourth hook 17a is configured to receive the cable 14 to removably couple the cable with the cable holder by engaging the exterior surface of the cable at the curved engagement surface (figs 2 and 5). Regarding claim 9, Beaudette '463, as modified, discloses, wherein the fourth hook is manufactured from the flexible material, as modified by Graham '379 (col. 4, lines 43-44 - " such as devices manufactured from Kevlar fiberglass, etc.. - see above motivation). Regarding claim 21, Beaudette '463, as modified, discloses, wherein the curved engagement surfaces of the first hook, the second hook, and the third hook are curved about the longitudinal axis of the body portion (figs 4 and 5). Regarding claim 22, Beaudette '463, as modified, discloses, wherein the second hook 17b is laterally offset relative to the first hook 18 and the third hook 17 along the longitudinal axis of the body portion. Regarding claim 23, Beaudette '463, as modified, discloses, wherein the first hook 18 and the third hook 17 extend from the body portion 16 outward and in a first vertical direction, and the second hook 17b extends from the body portion 16 outward and in a second vertical direction opposite the first vertical direction (fig. 2). Regarding claim 24, Beaudette '463, as modified, discloses, wherein the first hook 18, the second hook 17b, and the third hook 17 extend from the body portion 16 such that the curved engagement surfaces of the first hook and the third hook are mirrored about the longitudinal axis of the body portion relative to the curved engagement surface of the second hook (figs 4 and 5). Regarding claim 25, Beaudette '463, as modified, discloses, wherein each of the first hook, the second hook, and the third hook receive the cable 14 such that the cable 14 is received between the body portion 16 and the engagement surface of each the first hook 18, the second hook 17b, and the third hook 17. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 8-10, filed 1/13/26, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-5, 7-9 and 21-25 under US 4,373,463 to Beaudette in view of US 6,712,379 to Graham et al. have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of US 10,126,334 to Sugar. Sugar ‘334 is used to teach the obviousness of modifying a cable holder, like the one taught by Beaudette, with a sensor for detecting characteristics of a cable that is held by the cable holder. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MONICA E MILLNER whose telephone number is (571)270-7507. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Terrell McKinnon can be reached at 571-272-4797. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MONICA E MILLNER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3632
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 15, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 10, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 10, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 11, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 06, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593931
MAGNETIC HARDWARE DISPLAY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590750
REFRIGERATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592214
FOOT CONTROLLED SWITCH STABILIZING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584535
VIBRATION ISOLATION SYSTEM ADJUSTABLE IN THREE AXES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12558179
JOINT STRUCTURES AND RELATED DEVICES AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.9%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1125 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month