Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/542,015

SOCKET TERMINAL, SOCKET CONNECTOR AND CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 15, 2023
Priority
Mar 14, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0033307
Examiner
NGUYEN, THANG H
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
522 granted / 615 resolved
+16.9% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
633
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
76.3%
+36.3% vs TC avg
§102
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 615 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to because “the element 230 which is indicated a 2nd curve is not in the right area”. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claim 12 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 12 line 8 recites: “the second direction,.” Should be --the second direction. -- Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 are as best understood and are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen (US 8888507). As per claim 1: Chen discloses a socket terminal 2 (as shown in fig. 5) comprising: a first end extending in a first direction; a first curved portion extending from the first end in the first direction and curved in a second direction intersecting the first direction; a second curved portion extending from the first curved portion in the first direction and curved in a third direction opposite to the second direction; a third curved portion extending from the second curved portion in the first direction and curved in the third direction; and a second end extending from the third curved portion in a direction opposite to the first direction (see attached fig. 5, regarding the socket terminal’s structure applied to the instant invention). However, Chen does not explicitly disclose wherein the second end curved at least twice from the third curve portion. On the other hand, Chen is showed the 2nd end of the socket terminal is slight curve down (as shown in the attached fig. 5). However, a person having ordinary skill in the art would know that having the 2nd end curved at least twice from the third curve portion can only dealing with change in shape with the manufacture desire, because just the modification still would not change the function of the socket terminal but to further enhance a stable, reliable and secure connection to the other conducting terminals of the board to board connector. Further, since applicants have presented no explanation that these particular configurations of the 2nd end curve at least twice from the third curve portion are significant or are anything more than one of numerous configurations a person of ordinary skill in the art would find obvious for the purpose of providing a secure and stable connection between board to board connector. Since, a change in shape is generally recognizing as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Dailey, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1976). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to further modify the socket terminal of Chen by having the second end curved at least twice from the third curve portion as taught by the instant invention to further a stable, reliable and secure connection to the other conducting terminals of the board to board connector. Further, it appears that the prior art of record would perform equally well compare to the instant invention as recited above. PNG media_image1.png 282 569 media_image1.png Greyscale As per claims 2-4: Chen discloses the socket terminal 2, and the aforementioned limitations. However, Chen does not explicitly disclose wherein the second end includes: a first bent portion extending from the third curved portion and curved in the second direction; and a second bent portion extending from the first bent portion and curved in the third direction; and wherein the second end has an S-like shape; and wherein the second end has an L-like shape. On the other hand, Chen is showed the 2nd end of the socket terminal is slight curve down (as shown in the attached fig. 5). However, a person having ordinary skill in the art would know that having the 2nd end curved at least twice from the third curve portion can only dealing with change in shape with the manufacture desire, because just the modification still would not change the function of the socket terminal but to further enhance a stable, reliable and secure connection to the other conducting terminals of the board to board connector. Further, since applicants have presented no explanation that these particular configurations as recited above are significant or are anything more than one of numerous configurations a person of ordinary skill in the art would find obvious for the purpose of providing a secure and stable connection between board to board connector. Since, a change in shape is generally recognizing as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Dailey, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1976). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to further modify the socket terminal of Chen by having the second end includes: a first bent portion extending from the third curved portion and curved in the second direction; and a second bent portion extending from the first bent portion and curved in the third direction; and wherein the second end has an S-like shape; and wherein the second end has an L-like shape as taught by the instant invention to further a stable, reliable and secure connection to the other conducting terminals of the board to board connector. Further, it appears that the prior art of record would perform equally well compare to the instant invention as recited above. As per claim 5: Chen discloses a socket connector 2 comprising: a mold portion defining an inner space (see fig. 1; wherein the base portions 31 of the second conducting terminals 3 are fixedly mounted in the plug part 13 of the electrically insulative connector body 1 by insert molding); and socket terminal 2 disposed in the inner space of the mold portion (as shown in figs. 2-5), wherein each of the socket terminals 2 includes: a first end extending in a first direction; a first curved portion extending from the first end in the first direction and curved in a second direction intersecting the first direction; a second curved portion extending from the first curved portion in the first direction and curved in a third direction opposite to the second direction; a third curved portion extending from the second curved portion in the first direction and curved in the third direction; and a second end extending from the third curved portion in a direction opposite to the first direction (see attached fig. 5, regarding the socket terminal’s structure applied to the instant invention). However, Chen does not explicitly disclose wherein the second end curved at least twice from the third curve portion. On the other hand, Chen is showed the 2nd end of the socket terminal is slight curve down (as shown in the attached fig. 5). However, a person having ordinary skill in the art would know that having the 2nd end curved at least twice from the third curve portion can only dealing with change in shape with the manufacture desire, because just the modification still would not change the function of the socket terminal but to further enhance a stable, reliable and secure connection to the other conducting terminals of the board to board connector. Further, since applicants have presented no explanation that these particular configurations of the 2nd end curve at least twice from the third curve portion are significant or are anything more than one of numerous configurations a person of ordinary skill in the art would find obvious for the purpose of providing a secure and stable connection between board to board connector. Since, a change in shape is generally recognizing as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Dailey, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1976). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to further modify the socket terminal of Chen by having the second end curved at least twice from the third curve portion as taught by the instant invention to further a stable, reliable and secure connection to the other conducting terminals of the board to board connector. Further, it appears that the prior art of record would perform equally well compare to the instant invention as recited above. As per claims 6-8: Chen discloses the socket connector 2; and the aforementioned limitations. However, Chen does not explicitly disclose wherein the second end includes: a first bent portion extending from the third curved portion and curved in the second direction; and a second bent portion extending from the first bent portion and curved in the third direction; and wherein the second end has an S-like shape; and wherein the second end has an L-like shape. On the other hand, Chen is showed the 2nd end of the socket terminal is slight curve down (as shown in the attached fig. 5). However, a person having ordinary skill in the art would know that having the 2nd end curved at least twice from the third curve portion can only dealing with change in shape with the manufacture desire, because just the modification still would not change the function of the socket terminal but to further enhance a stable, reliable and secure connection to the other conducting terminals of the board to board connector. Further, since applicants have presented no explanation that these particular configurations as recited above are significant or are anything more than one of numerous configurations a person of ordinary skill in the art would find obvious for the purpose of providing a secure and stable connection between board to board connector. Since, a change in shape is generally recognizing as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Dailey, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1976). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to further modify the socket terminal of Chen by having the second end includes: a first bent portion extending from the third curved portion and curved in the second direction; and a second bent portion extending from the first bent portion and curved in the third direction; and wherein the second end has an S-like shape; and wherein the second end has an L-like shape as taught by the instant invention to further a stable, reliable and secure connection to the other conducting terminals of the board to board connector. Further, it appears that the prior art of record would perform equally well compare to the instant invention as recited above. As per claims 9; and 11: Chen discloses the socket connector 2; where the mold portion covers at least a portion of the first end (as shown in fig. 5); and wherein an inner surface of the first curved portion contacts the mold portion (as shown in fig. 5). As per claim 10: Chen discloses the socket connector 2. However, Chen does not explicitly disclose wherein an inner surface of the first curved portion is spaced apart from the mold portion. On the other hand, Chen showed an inner surface of the third curved portion is spaced apart from the mold portion to further provide a clearance space for fitting as well as enhance a stable and reliable connection for the second conducting terminals when in contact to the first conducting terminals. However, a person having ordinary skill in the art would know that having an inner surface of the first curved portion is spaced apart from the mold portion can only deal with common sense in the art of the connector, because such modification still would not change the function of the socket terminal after all, and would have been an obvious matter of design choice to have the inner surface of the first curved portion is spaced apart from the mold portion. Further, applicant has not disclosed that the inner surface of the first curved portion is spaced apart from the mold portion solves any stated problem or is for any particular purpose and it appears that the invention would perform equally well with the prior art of record. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to further modify the socket terminal of Chen by having the inner surface of the first curved portion is spaced apart from the mold portion as taught by the instant invention to further provide a clearance space for fitting as well as enhance a stable and reliable connection for the second conducting terminals when in contact to the first conducting terminals. As per claims 12-13: Chen discloses the socket connector 2, wherein the mold portion includes: a bottom portion 131; a first sidewall and a second sidewall opposite to each other, wherein each of the first sidewall and the second sidewall protrudes from the bottom portion in the second direction; and a third sidewall and a fourth sidewall intersecting the first sidewall and the second sidewall, and opposite to each other, wherein each of the third sidewall and the fourth sidewall protrudes from the bottom portion in the second direction (as shown in figs. 1,4; and wherein the base portions 31 of the second conducting terminals 3 are fixedly mounted in the plug part 13 of the electrically insulative connector body 1 by insert molding, enabling the first arm portions 321 to extend upwardly along the inner side of the positioning protruding member 132 into the recessed mating chamber 10, the connection portions 32 to be supported on the topmost edge of the positioning protruding member 132 and the second arm portions 322 to clamp on the outer side of the positioning protruding member 132); and wherein the socket terminals 2 protrude from the first sidewall and the second sidewall (as shown in figs. 1, 4). As per claim 14: Chen discloses a connector assembly (as shown in fig. 3) comprising: a socket connector 1 including a mold portion defining an inner space and socket terminals 2 disposed in the inner space of the mold portion (as shown in figs. 1-2); and a plug connector 3 including plug terminals coupled to the socket terminals 1 (as shown in fig. 2), respectively, wherein each of the socket terminals 2 includes: a first end extending in a first direction; a first curved portion extending from the first end in the first direction and curved in a second direction intersecting the first direction; a second curved portion extending from the first curved portion in the first direction and curved in a third direction opposite to the second direction; a third curved portion extending from the second curved portion in the first direction and curved in the third direction; and a second end extending from the third curved portion in a direction opposite to the first direction (see attached fig. 5, regarding the socket terminal’s structure applied to the instant invention). However, Chen does not explicitly disclose wherein the second end curved at least twice from the third curve portion. On the other hand, Chen is showed the 2nd end of the socket terminal is slight curve down (as shown in the attached fig. 5). However, a person having ordinary skill in the art would know that having the 2nd end curved at least twice from the third curve portion can only dealing with change in shape with the manufacture desire, because just the modification still would not change the function of the socket terminal but to further enhance a stable, reliable and secure connection to the other conducting terminals of the board to board connector. Further, since applicants have presented no explanation that these particular configurations of the 2nd end curve at least twice from the third curve portion are significant or are anything more than one of numerous configurations a person of ordinary skill in the art would find obvious for the purpose of providing a secure and stable connection between board to board connector. Since, a change in shape is generally recognizing as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Dailey, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1976). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to further modify the socket terminal of Chen by having the second end curved at least twice from the third curve portion as taught by the instant invention to further a stable, reliable and secure connection to the other conducting terminals of the board to board connector. Further, it appears that the prior art of record would perform equally well compare to the instant invention as recited above. As per claims 15, and 17: Chen discloses the connector assembly (as shown in fig. 3), and the aforementioned limitations. However, Chen does not explicitly disclose wherein each of the plug terminals contact the second end. On the other hand, Chen showed each of the plug terminals 3 contacts the first curve portion (as shown in fig. 6). However, a person having ordinary skill in the art would know that having the plug terminals contact the second end also can only dealing with change in shape with the manufacture desire, because just the modification still would not change the function of the socket terminal or the plug terminals after all but to further enhance a stable, reliable and secure connection to the other conducting terminals of the board to board connector. Further, since applicants have presented no explanation that these particular configurations of the socket terminals and the plug terminals are significant or are anything more than one of numerous configurations a person of ordinary skill in the art would find obvious for the purpose of providing a secure and stable connection between board to board connector. Since, a change in shape is generally recognizing as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Dailey, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1976). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to further modify the socket terminal of Chen by having each of the plug terminals contact the second end as taught by the instant invention but to further enhance a stable, reliable and secure connection to the other conducting terminals of the board to board connector. As per claims 16, and 18-19: Chen discloses the connector assembly (as shown in fig. 3), and the aforementioned limitations. However, Chen does not explicitly disclose wherein the second end includes: a first bent portion extending from the third curved portion and curved in the second direction; and a second bent portion extending from the first bent portion and curved in the third direction; and wherein the second end has an S-like shape; and wherein the second end has an L-like shape. On the other hand, Chen is showed the 2nd end of the socket terminal is slight curve down (as shown in the attached fig. 5). However, a person having ordinary skill in the art would know that having the 2nd end curved at least twice from the third curve portion can only dealing with change in shape with the manufacture desire, because just the modification still would not change the function of the socket terminal but to further enhance a stable, reliable and secure connection to the other conducting terminals of the board to board connector. Further, since applicants have presented no explanation that these particular configurations as recited above are significant or are anything more than one of numerous configurations a person of ordinary skill in the art would find obvious for the purpose of providing a secure and stable connection between board to board connector. Since, a change in shape is generally recognizing as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Dailey, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1976). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to further modify the socket terminal of Chen by having the second end includes: a first bent portion extending from the third curved portion and curved in the second direction; and a second bent portion extending from the first bent portion and curved in the third direction; and wherein the second end has an S-like shape; and wherein the second end has an L-like shape as taught by the instant invention to further a stable, reliable and secure connection to the other conducting terminals of the board to board connector. Further, it appears that the prior art of record would perform equally well compare to the instant invention as recited above. As per claim 20: Chen discloses the connector assembly (as shown in fig. 3), and wherein an inner surface of the first curved portion contacts the mold portion (as shown in fig. 5). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THANG H NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-0288. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdullah Riyami can be reached at 571-270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.H.N/Examiner, Art Unit 2831 /ABDULLAH A RIYAMI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 15, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640519
RETAINER, TEMPERATURE DETECTION ASSEMBLY, CONNECTOR HOUSING AND CONNECTOR
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640524
CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY WITH IMPROVED HEAT DISSIPATION EFFECT
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12616246
HEATER ASSEMBLY HAVING FLUID PERMEABLE HEATER WITH DIRECTLY DEPOSITED TRANSPORT MATERIAL
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12620742
Female terminal, socket, battery pack, power tool and power tool system
3y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12620740
CONNECTOR CONNECTING AN ELECTRIC WIRE TO A SUBSTRATE
2y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.9%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 615 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month