Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/543,846

DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 18, 2023
Priority
Jun 08, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0073682
Examiner
VO, TUYEN KIM
Art Unit
2876
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
933 granted / 1191 resolved
+10.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1210
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
81.3%
+41.3% vs TC avg
§102
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
§112
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1191 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 10-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 10, the recitation of “performing a process for defining the semiconductor areas” is vague because “the process” is not clearly defined. Such recitation of “the process” renders ambiguity of what is “the process” to be applied. Similar problem exists for “an additional process” recites at lines 10-11. The dependent claims 11-20 are also rejected because they are, directly or indirectly, depending from the rejected claim 10. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art of record, taken alone or in combination, fails to teach or fairly suggest a display device comprising: a pixel circuit disposed on a base layer and including a transistor, the transistor including a source electrode, a drain electrode, a gate electrode, and a semiconductor layer; and a light emitting element electrically connected to the pixel circuit, wherein the semiconductor layer includes a low concentration area, a high concentration area, and a slope concentration area between the low concentration area and the high concentration area which are divided based on a concentration of a carrier and are spaced apart from each other in a length direction of the base layer, the low concentration area and a portion of the slope concentration area form a channel area, and form a source area and a drain area including the high concentration area and at least another portion of the slope concentration area, and especially, the semiconductor layer in the slope concentration area satisfies Equation 1: 6.6 PNG media_image1.png 26 52 media_image1.png Greyscale 11 [1/(cm3- µm)] where ΔX is a length change amount [µm] in a length direction of the semiconductor layer in the slope concentration area, and ΔY is a concentration change amount [1/(cm3)] of the carrier in the length change amount in the slope concentration area as recited in claim 1. Similar limitations as recited in claim 9 and further limitations of the dependent claims 2-8. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. References: Kwon et al. (US 2025/0166561); Morita (US 12,236,876); Kim (US 12,217,700); Jung et al. (US 2024/0257689); Kim et al. (US 11,935,471); Kusunoki et al. (US 2024/0412687); Kim et al. (US 2024/0062712); Jang et al. (US 2021/0201782) and Bong et al. (US 2023/0360604) are cited because they are related to display apparatus. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Tuyen Kim Vo whose telephone number is (571)270-1657. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs: 8AM-6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Paik can be reached at 571-272-2404. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUYEN K VO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 18, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 03, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 03, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12639544
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONSTRUCTING PROGRAMMABLE CREDENTIAL AND SECURITY CARDS
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640017
CUSTOMER ASSISTANCE AT SELF CHECKOUTS USING COMPUTER VISION
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12639548
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING SECURE TAGS
1y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630081
LIGHT-EMITTING GLAZING FOR A VEHICLE, AND VEHICLE COMPRISING SUCH LIGHT-EMITTING GLAZING
1y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12619848
COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR COLLECTING INFORMATION ABOUT A MOBILE DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+17.7%)
1y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1191 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month