Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/543,849

AMPLIFIER CIRCUIT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 18, 2023
Priority
Apr 05, 2023 — JP 2023-061667
Examiner
SUN, YU-HSI DAVID
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
654 granted / 851 resolved
+8.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
877
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
45.9%
+5.9% vs TC avg
§102
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 851 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the semiconductor layer" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Note the dependent claims necessarily inherit the indefiniteness of the claims on which they depend. Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 2-10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 1, the closest prior art of record, Struble et al. (US PG Pub 2022/0321062), either singularly or in combination, does not disclose or suggest the combination of limitations including “An amplifier circuit comprising: a first FET (Field Effect Transistor) including a first source electrode provided on the semiconductive layer and connected to a first reference potential in a high frequency manner, a first gate electrode provided on the semiconductive layer and inputting a high frequency signal, a first drain electrode provided on the semiconductive layer, and a first field plate having at least a part thereof provided above the semiconductive layer between the first gate electrode and the first drain electrode; and a second FET including a second source provided on the semiconductive layer and electrically connected to the first drain, a second gate provided on the semiconductive layer and connected to a second reference potential in the high frequency manner, a second drain provided on the semiconductive layer and outputting a high frequency signal, and a second field plate having at least a part thereof provided above the semiconductor layer between the second gate electrode and the second drain electrode; wherein a first distance between an end closer to the first drain electrode in ends of a surface of the first gate electrode facing the semiconductor layer and an end closer to the first drain electrode in ends of the first field plate is shorter than a second distance between an end closer to the second drain electrode in ends of a surface of the second gate electrode facing the semiconductor layer and an end closer to the second drain electrode in ends of the second field plate”. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YU-HSI DAVID SUN whose telephone number is (571)270-5773. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8am-4pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marlon Fletcher can be reached at 571-272-2063. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YU-HSI D SUN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 18, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12610873
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT PACKAGE AND METHOD
1y 9m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12604693
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING CHIPS
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598821
CHIP PACKAGE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593717
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 7m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581982
BONDING WIRE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
3y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+8.6%)
2y 8m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 851 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month