Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/544,735

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM INCLUDING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 19, 2023
Priority
May 26, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0068426
Examiner
OH, JAEHWAN
Art Unit
2899
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
572 granted / 673 resolved
+17.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
689
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
49.5%
+9.5% vs TC avg
§102
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 673 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 1. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. 2. Claim 1-18 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Izumi et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2016/0093524, hereinafter referred to as Izumi) in view of SHARANGPANI et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2020/0152655, hereinafter referred to as SHARANGPANI). As to claim 1, Izumi teaches 1. A semiconductor device, comprising: a substrate having a cell array region and a contact region; the cell array region including a gate stack structure having a plurality of interlayer insulation layers and a plurality of gate electrodes alternately stacked on the substrate; the contact region including a gate pattern stack structure having a plurality of gate patterns and a plurality of insulation layers alternately stacked on the substrate, the plurality of gate patterns extending from and integral with the plurality of gate electrodes, the contact region further including a gate contact portion penetrating at least a portion of the gate pattern stack structure and electrically connected to the gate pattern; and a channel structure penetrating the gate stack structure and extending in a direction intersecting the substrate. [see 100, 300, 32, 42, 55 in Fig. 1~16] Izumi may not explicitly teach the plurality of insulation layers including a first insulation layer and a second insulation layer, the second insulation layer being made of a material different than the first insulation layer. SHARANGPANI teaches this limitation [see 32, 32, 45 in Fig.2; ¶0039 for example] Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to combine the teachings of Izumi and SHARANGPANI to “use a first insulation layer and a second insulation layer" in Izumi according to SHARANGPANI, for the further advantage of “utilizing known method of obtaining etch selectivity”. […Referring to FIGS. 8A and 8B, an etchant that selectively etches the sacrificial material of the sacrificial material layers 42 with respect to the materials of the insulating layers 32 and the nucleation promoter layers 45 can be introduced into the backside trenches 79, for example, using an etch process….¶0085] As to claim 2, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 2. The semiconductor device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the gate contact portion: penetrates a through-gate pattern that is at least a portion of the plurality of gate patterns and is insulated from the through-gate pattern by a gate spacer; and connects to a connection gate electrode in a lower portion of the penetration gate pattern. [Izumi Fig. 16] As to claim 3, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 3. The semiconductor device as claimed in claim 2, wherein a lower surface of the gate contact portion is aligned on a same boundary as a lower surface of the gate spacer, or protrudes further toward the substrate beyond the lower surface of the gate spacer. [Izumi Fig. 16] As to claim 4, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 4. The semiconductor device as claimed in claim 1, wherein a side surface of the gate pattern stack structure is aligned in a direction perpendicular to the substrate. [Izumi Fig. 16] As to claim 5, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 5. The semiconductor device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second insulation layer includes at least one element or isotope not contained in the first insulation layer and an organic polymer. [SHARANGPANI ¶0039] As to claim 6, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 6. The semiconductor device as claimed in claim 5, wherein the second insulation layer includes at least one of carbon, boron, fluorine, potassium, gold, platinum, calcium, and titanium. [SHARANGPANI ¶0039] As to claim 7, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 7. The semiconductor device as claimed in claim 6, wherein: the first insulation layer includes silicon oxide; and the second insulation layer includes at least one of silicon carbonate, silicon carbonate nitride, and silicon carbonitride. [SHARANGPANI ¶0039] As to claim 8, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 8. The semiconductor device as claimed in claim 5, wherein the second insulation layer includes a metal compound having a metal different from the gate pattern or a compound doped with the metal. [SHARANGPANI ¶0039] As to claim 9, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 9. The semiconductor device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second insulation layer has an etch selectivity with respect to the first insulation layer. [SHARANGPANI ¶0039] As to claim 10, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 10. The semiconductor device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second insulation layer has a lower dielectric constant than the first insulation layer or silicon oxide. [SHARANGPANI ¶0039] As to claim 11, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 11. The semiconductor device as claimed in claim 1, wherein a thickness of the second insulation layer is less than a thickness of the first insulation layer. [SHARANGPANI ¶0039] As to claim 12, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 12. The semiconductor device as claimed in claim 11, wherein the thickness of the second insulation layer is 1/100 to 1/10 of a thickness of the interlayer insulation layer. [SHARANGPANI ¶0039] As to claim 13, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 13. The semiconductor device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the gate pattern is formed as same layers as the gate electrode is formed. [Izumi Fig. 16] As to claim 14, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 14. The semiconductor device as claimed in claim 1, wherein: each of the interlayer insulation layers includes a first interlayer insulation layer and a second interlayer insulation layer positioned on the gate electrode; and the second insulation layer and the second interlayer insulation layer are formed as a same layer, and the first insulation layer and the first interlayer insulation layer are formed as a same layer. [SHARANGPANI Fig. 15] As to claim 15, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 15. An electronic system, comprising: a main substrate; a semiconductor device on the main substrate; and a controller electrically connected to the semiconductor device on the main substrate, the semiconductor device having a circuit region including a peripheral circuit structure and a cell region on the circuit region and including a cell array region and a contact region, the cell region having: a gate stack structure in the cell array region, including a plurality of interlayer insulation layers and a plurality of gate electrodes alternately stacked on the substrate; a gate pattern stack structure in the contact region, including a plurality of gate patterns and a plurality of insulation layers alternately stacked, the plurality of gate patterns extending from and integral with the plurality of gate electrodes, the plurality of insulation layers including at least one first insulation layer and at least one second insulation layer, the second insulation layer being made of a material different than the first insulation layer, the contact region further including a gate contact portion penetrating at least a portion of the gate pattern stack structure and electrically connected to the gate pattern; and a channel structure penetrating the gate stack structure to extend in a direction intersecting the substrate. [Izumi Fig. 1~16; SHARANGPANI Fig.2, ¶0039] As to claim 16, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 16. The electronic system as claimed in claim 15, wherein the second insulation layer includes at least one element or isotope not contained in the first insulation layer and an organic polymer. [SHARANGPANI ¶0039] As to claim 17, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 17. The electronic system as claimed in claim 15, further comprising a gate spacer surrounding the gate contact portion, wherein a lower surface of the gate contact portion is aligned on a same boundary as a lower surface of the gate spacer, or protrudes further toward the substrate beyond the lower surface of the gate spacer. [SHARANGPANI ¶0039] As to claim 18, Izumi and SHARANGPANI teaches 18. The electronic system as claimed in claim 17, wherein a side surface of the gate pattern stack structure is aligned in a direction perpendicular to the substrate. Conclusion Claims 1-18 are rejected as explained above. The prior art made of record in the PTO-892 form and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAEHWAN OH whose telephone number is (571) 270-5800. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday 9:00 AM-5:00PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brent Fairbanks can be reached on 408-918-7532. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAEHWAN OH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 19, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12708047
POWER SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698573
SIC EPITAXIAL WAFER AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SIC EPITAXIAL WAFER
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696471
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690432
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12685043
REACTIVE-ION DEPOSITION PROCESSES FOR DIELECTRIC MATERIAL FORMATION
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 673 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month