Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/545,774

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR OPTICAL COMB GENERATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 19, 2023
Examiner
VU, PHU
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
848 granted / 994 resolved
+17.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1024
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
57.3%
+17.3% vs TC avg
§102
34.5%
-5.5% vs TC avg
§112
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 994 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shevy US 20070153840. Regarding claim 1, Shevy teaches a standing wave optical resonator configured to generate an optical frequency comb, the standing wave optical resonator comprising: a first mirror (FM) (111 fiber grating reflector) comprising a first FM port configured to transmit a portion of the optical frequency comb, and a second FM port ( fiber connecting point 112); a Bragg grating (BG) (intracavity filter 160 [0032])comprising a first BG port (fiber connecting point 112) and a second BG port (fiber connecting point 122), wherein the first BG port is optically coupled to the second FM port, and wherein the Bragg grating is configured to alternately shift, lower and higher in wavelength, resonances of the standing wave optical resonator in a stop bandwidth of the Bragg grating ([0032]-[0033] The filter 160 may include two fiber Bragg grating reflectors 161 and 162 to reflect light at the laser wavelength at a band slightly larger than the bandwidth of the reflection bandwidth of 111 and 121 and transmit light at the laser mode frequency) ; and a second mirror (SM) (fiber grating reflector 121) comprising a first SM port (fiber connecting point 122) optically coupled to the second BG port. Regarding claim 2, Shevy teaches the standing wave optical resonator of claim 1, wherein a reflectivity of the first SM port is greater than a reflectivity of the second FM port ( pump receiving reflector 111 may be partially transmissive and reflector 121 may be completely reflective [0028]). Regarding claim 3, Shevy teaches the standing wave optical resonator of claim 1, wherein the first FM port is configured to receive an optical pump signal (fig. 1 101) having a carrier wavelength in the stop bandwidth and which is closer to a resonance shifted higher in wavelength than to an adjacent resonance shifted lower in wavelength [0037]. Regarding claim 4, the limitation of wherein an amount of wavelength that the resonance shifted higher in wavelength is shifted higher equals an amount of wavelength that the resonance shifted in higher in wavelength is shifted lower in wavelength due to a Kerr effect does not appear to impart any structural limitation not taught by Shevy as the Kerr effect should apply in this situation. If there is additional structure not taught by Shevy this is not evident. Regarding claim 5, Shevy teaches standing wave optical resonator of claim 1, wherein the first FM port is further configured to receive an optical pump signal having a power level greater than a threshold power level, necessary to generate the optical frequency comb in the standing wave optical resonator, that is less than another threshold power level necessary to generate the optical frequency comb in a travelling wave optical resonator comprising the Bragg grating ([0037]). Regarding claim 6, Shevy teaches the standing wave optical resonator of claim 1, wherein each of the first mirror and the second mirror comprises an optical loop mirror or a plane mirror ([0028] 111 first mirror is formed as a Bragg grating [0058] denotes that each Bragg grating can be formed as a planar waveguide structure). Regarding claim 7, Shevy teaches the standing wave optical resonator of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first mirror, the second mirror, and the Bragg grating are formed from planar optical waveguide on a substrate [0058]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 8, Shevy teaches a method for generating an optical frequency comb with a standing wave optical resonator comprising a Bragg grating (fig. 7 160 intracavity filter), a first mirror (FM) (fiber grating reflector 111), a second mirror (SM) (fiber grating reflector 121), the method comprising: receiving, at a first FM port of the first mirror, an optical pump signal having a carrier wavelength in a stop bandwidth of the Bragg grating and which is closer to a resonance shifted higher in wavelength than to an adjacent resonance shifted lower in frequency (Pump Beam 101), wherein the first mirror is optically coupled to a first port of the Bragg grating and the second mirror is optically coupled to a second port of the Bragg grating (see fig. 7); transmitting a portion of the optical pump signal into the standing wave optical resonator (101A transmitted Pump Beam); Shevy does not specifically teach with the Bragg grating, alternately shifting, lower and higher in wavelength, resonances of the standing wave optical resonator in the stop bandwidth of the Bragg grating; generating the optical frequency comb in the standing wave optical resonator; and transmitting a portion of the optical frequency comb from the first FM port of the first mirror. Regarding claims 15-20, Shevy does not teach apparatus for generating an optical frequency comb, the apparatus comprising: a non-reciprocal optical device (NROD) including a first NROD port configured to receive an optical pump signal, a second NROD port configured to transmit a portion of the optical pump signal and to receive a portion of the optical frequency comb, and a third NROD port configured to transmit a portion of the portion of the optical frequency comb; and a standing wave optical resonator, comprising: a first mirror (FM) comprising (a) a first FM port optically coupled to the first NROD port and configured to transmit the portion of the optical frequency comb to the first NROD port and to receive the portion of the optical pump signal from the first NROD port, and (b) a second FM port; Shevy does teach a Bragg grating (BG) comprising a first BG port and a second BG port, wherein the first BG port is optically coupled to the second FM port, and wherein the Bragg grating is configured to alternately shift, lower and higher in wavelength, resonances of the standing wave optical resonator in a stop bandwidth of the Bragg grating, wherein the optical pump signal has a carrier wavelength in the stop bandwidth and which is closer to a resonance shifted higher in wavelength than to an adjacent resonance shifted lower in wavelength; and a second mirror (SM) comprising a first SM port optically coupled to the second BG port (see above). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHU VU whose telephone number is (571)272-1562. The examiner can normally be reached 11:00 - 7:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached at 571-272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHU VU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 19, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 24, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 31, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601960
CONTROL APPARATUS, INTERCHANGEABLE LENS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596217
OPTICAL ELEMENT AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585152
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585081
OPTICAL MODULE AND VIRTUAL REALITY (VR) DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12560841
LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+9.2%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 994 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month