Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/547,217

METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR EXTENDED REALITY ENHANCEMENT IN MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 21, 2023
Examiner
NDIAYE, CHEIKH T
Art Unit
2447
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
MediaTek Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
564 granted / 717 resolved
+20.7% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
740
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
§103
35.9%
-4.1% vs TC avg
§102
31.6%
-8.4% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 717 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-11, 13, 15, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Hande et al (US Publication No. 2020/0389813 A1). With respect to claim 1, Hande teaches a method, comprising: establishing, by a processor of an apparatus, a communication with a network node of a wireless network (paragraph 0035; 0069-0072; Fig. 5, 7 disclose the UE 120 associated with an application client 710 (e.g., HMD 540 of FIG. 5) communicating files to the RAN 110 or the AS 140), and performing, by the processor, an operation with respect to extended reality (XR)-related computation offloading from a user end to result in XR enhancement at the user end (paragraph 0035; 0069-0072; Fig. 5, 7 disclose traffic flow 600 may be associated with a certain communication parameters, such as GBR, PBR, and/or PDB that may be configured by the BS 110a or UE 120a based on target metrics (e.g., FER and/or FDB) of each of the files). With respect to claim 2, Hande teaches wherein the operation comprises labeling of data transmitted across one or more layers between an XR application server and the network node with delay information to assist and optimize network scheduling (paragraph 0057 disclose the traffic flow 600 may be controlled via packet filters and metrics according to PER and PDB. However, XR applications might specify metrics on a group of packets (e.g., file). For instance, XR applications may specify an FER rather than PER, or a FDB instead of a PDB. Moreover, the reliability requirements of files may vary. In some cases, an XR application may specify a policy with regards to file handling. For instance, an application may specify that a file may be used only if all packets of a file are received, or that a contiguous stream of packets up to the first packet in error may be used). With respect to claim 3, Hande teaches wherein the labeling of the data with the delay information comprises labeling the data with the delay information at a packet level (paragraph 0057-0058 disclose the traffic flow 600 may be controlled via packet filters and metrics according to PER and PDB. However, XR applications might specify metrics on a group of packets (e.g., file). For instance, XR applications may specify an FER rather than PER, or a FDB instead of a PDB. Moreover, the reliability requirements of files may vary. In some cases, an XR application may specify a policy with regards to file handling. For instance, an application may specify that a file may be used only if all packets of a file are received, or that a contiguous stream of packets up to the first packet in error may be used). With respect to claim 4, Hande teaches wherein the labeling of the data with the delay information at the packet level comprises labeling each packet with a respective priority level corresponding to a respective amount of remaining or consumed delay (paragraph 0036 disclose the one or more target metrics comprise a target file delay budget (FDB) associated with the file, and wherein determining one or more communication parameters for communicating the plurality of packets further comprises setting a packet delivery deadline of each of the plurality of packets to meet the target FDB). With respect to claim 5, Hande teaches wherein the operation further comprises offloading based on the labeled delay information to result in one or more packets with a smaller remaining delay budget are processed at an edge server while one or more other packets with a larger remaining delay budget are processed at a remote server (paragraph 0036; 0057-0058 disclose the traffic flow 600 may be controlled via packet filters and metrics according to PER and PDB. However, XR applications might specify metrics on a group of packets (e.g., file). For instance, XR applications may specify an FER rather than PER, or a FDB instead of a PDB. Moreover, the reliability requirements of files may vary. In some cases, an XR application may specify a policy with regards to file handling. For instance, an application may specify that a file may be used only if all packets of a file are received, or that a contiguous stream of packets up to the first packet in error may be used). With respect to claim 7, Hande teaches wherein the labeling of the data with the delay information comprises performing packet segmentation to result in new packets sharing a same residual delay budget (paragraph 0036; 0057-0058 disclose the traffic flow 600 may be controlled via packet filters and metrics according to PER and PDB. However, XR applications might specify metrics on a group of packets (e.g., file)). With respect to claim 8, Hande teaches wherein the labeling of the data with the delay information comprises performing packet concatenation on a plurality of packets to result in new packets using a lowest delay budget among a plurality of delay budgets associated with the plurality of packets (paragraph 0036; 0057-0058 disclose the traffic flow 600 may be controlled via packet filters and metrics according to PER and PDB. However, XR applications might specify metrics on a group of packets (e.g., file)). With respect to claim 9, Hande teaches wherein the operation comprises communicating quality of service (QoS) metrics characterizing a network operation of the network node to an XR application server (paragraph 0035; 0069-0072; Fig. 5, 7 disclose traffic flow 600 may be associated with a certain communication parameters, such as GBR, PBR, and/or PDB that may be configured by the BS 110a or UE 120a based on target metrics (e.g., FER and/or FDB) of each of the files). With respect to claim 10, Hande teaches wherein the QoS metrics comprise a bit rate, an amount of latency and a level of reliability supported by the wireless network at a specific time (paragraph 0047 disclose the traffic requirements for a service may be summarized via a set of target metrics (e.g., QoS parameters) and associated with the traffic flow that supports that service. The parameters may include a file error rate (FER) or a packet error rate (PER), a file delay budget (FDB) or a packet delay budget (PDB), and/or a guaranteed bit rate (GBR) (not shown). The FER/PER may be the ratio, in percent, of successfully received files/packets). With respect to claim 11, Hande teaches wherein the operation comprises signaling to an XR application server information related to a mobility event performed by the network node to result in the XR application server using the information in sending a quality of service (QoS) flow, encoding, rendering adjustment, and performing codec adaptation (paragraph 0047-0051 disclose the traffic requirements for a service may be summarized via a set of target metrics (e.g., QoS parameters) and associated with the traffic flow that supports that service). With respect to claim 13, Hande teaches wherein the operation comprises signaling to an XR application server information on a prediction about a mobility event or a traffic-related event to result in the XR application server using the information in sending a quality of service (QoS) flow, encoding, rendering adjustment, and performing codec adaptation (paragraph 0047-0051 disclose the traffic requirements for a service may be summarized via a set of target metrics (e.g., QoS parameters) and associated with the traffic flow that supports that service). With respect to claim 15, Hande teaches wherein the operation comprises communicating quality of service (QoS) metrics characterizing an XR application server to the network node (paragraph 0035; 0069-0072; Fig. 5, 7 disclose traffic flow 600 may be associated with a certain communication parameters, such as GBR, PBR, and/or PDB that may be configured by the BS 110a or UE 120a based on target metrics (e.g., FER and/or FDB) of each of the files). With respect to claim 17, Hande teaches wherein the operation comprises signaling to an XR application server information about an event that impacts performance of the network node, and wherein the event comprises one or more of channel degradation, beam blockage, interference, and bandwidth part (BWP) switching (paragraph 0066). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6, 12, 14, 16, and 18-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHEIKH T NDIAYE whose telephone number is (571)270-3914. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOON H HWANG can be reached at 571-272-4036. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHEIKH T NDIAYE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2447 11/1/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603751
AN INCOHERENT CLOCKING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592918
Browser Extension for Validating Communications
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587433
NODE HEALTH PREDICTION BASED ON FAILURE ISSUES EXPERIENCED PRIOR TO DEPLOYMENT IN A CLOUD COMPUTING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581545
SESSION MANAGEMENT FUNCTION SELECTION AND BLOCKING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580808
PROCESSOR FOR PERFORMING, WHEN PROBLEM OCCURS, RECOVERY ROUTINE ON BASIS OF MONITORING OF NETWORK STATE AND THROUGHPUT, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+19.0%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 717 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month