Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/547,235

RESIN COMPOSITION, CURED PRODUCT, LAMINATE, TRANSPARENT ANTENNA, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, AND IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Aug 21, 2023
Priority
Feb 22, 2021 — JP 2021-026218 +1 more
Examiner
PIZIALI, ANDREW T
Art Unit
1789
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
RESONAC Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
28%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
56%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 28% of cases
28%
Career Allowance Rate
216 granted / 757 resolved
-36.5% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 6m
Avg Prosecution
66 currently pending
Career history
826
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.3%
+14.3% vs TC avg
§102
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
§112
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 757 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Group I in the reply filed on 12/29/2025 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 7-20 are withdrawn from further consideration as being drawn to a nonelected invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102/103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by JP 2016079373 to Fuji or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over JP 2016079373 to Fuji in view of WO2018163900 to Yamatsu and/or JP2017057271 to Ishida. Claim 1, Fuji discloses a resin composition, comprising: an elastomer; a (meth)acrylic compound; and a thermal polymerization initiator (see entire translation document including [0013], [0016]-[0020] and [0026]-[0028]). In the event that it is shown that the applied prior art does not disclose the claimed embodiment with sufficient specificity, the invention is obvious because Yamatsu and/or Ishida further disclose the claimed constituents. Claim 2, the (meth)acrylic compound may include alkanediol di(meth)acrylate ([0016]-[0020]). Claim 3, the (meth)acrylic compound includes a compound represented by the claimed formula ([0016]-[0020] and Formula 1). Claim 4, the thermal polymerization initiator may include a peroxide ([0027]-[0028]). Claim 5, Fuji discloses that the peroxide may be a dialkyl peroxide [0027]. Claim 6, the elastomer may include a styrene-based elastomer [0013]. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by WO2018163900 to Yamatsu or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over WO2018163900 to Yamatsu in view of JP 2016079373 to Fuji and/or JP2017057271 to Ishida. Claim 1, Yamatsu discloses a resin composition, comprising: an elastomer; a (meth)acrylic compound; and a thermal polymerization initiator (see entire translation document including the abstract, [0045] and [0054]-[0110]). In the event that it is shown that the applied prior art does not disclose the claimed embodiment with sufficient specificity, the invention is obvious because Fuji and/or Ishida further discloses the claimed constituents. Claim 2, the (meth)acrylic compound may include alkanediol di(meth)acrylate [0058]. Claim 3, the (meth)acrylic compound includes a compound represented by the claimed formula ([0060]-[0110] and Formula 1). Claim 4, the thermal polymerization initiator may include a peroxide [0103]. Claim 5, Yamatsu discloses that the peroxide may be a dialkyl peroxide [0104]. Claim 6, the elastomer may include a styrene-based elastomer [0110]. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by JP2017057271 to Ishida or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over JP2017057271 to Ishida in view of JP 2016079373 to Fuji and/or WO2018163900 to Yamatsu. Claim 1, Ishida discloses a resin composition, comprising: an elastomer; a (meth)acrylic compound; and a thermal polymerization initiator (see entire translation document including the abstract, [0015]-[0046]). In the event that it is shown that the applied prior art does not disclose the claimed embodiment with sufficient specificity, the invention is obvious because Fuji and/or Yamatsu further discloses the claimed constituents. Claim 2, the (meth)acrylic compound may include alkanediol di(meth)acrylate [0032]. Claim 3, the (meth)acrylic compound includes a compound represented by the claimed formula [0015]-[0046]). Claim 4, the thermal polymerization initiator may include a peroxide [0037]. Claim 5, the thermal polymerization initiator may include dialkyl peroxide [0037]. Claim 6, the elastomer may include a styrene-based elastomer ([0045]-[0046]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW T PIZIALI whose telephone number is (571)272-1541. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marla McConnell can be reached at 571-270-7692. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW T PIZIALI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1789
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 15, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673842
Fiber Package
4y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674074
Durable Water-Repellent Treatment for Synthetics and Natural Fibers
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662757
THERMOPLASTIC POLYURETHANE SELF-CRIMPING CONJUGATE FIBER AND FABRIC
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655232
DEVICE FOR PRETREATING REFINED COTTON AND METHOD OF USE OF SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12657623
DYEING ABSORBANCE SPECTRA PREDICTION APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MIXED DYE
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
28%
Grant Probability
56%
With Interview (+27.4%)
4y 6m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 757 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month