Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/547,460

SELF-ASPIRATING SYRINGE SYSTEMS, CARTRIDGES, AND METHODS

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Aug 22, 2023
Priority
Feb 25, 2021 — provisional 63/153,420 +1 more
Examiner
AHMED, TASNIM M
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Eli Lilly and Company
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
364 granted / 449 resolved
+11.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
470
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
39.7%
-0.3% vs TC avg
§102
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 449 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment This office action is responsive to the amendment filed on 27 August 2026. As directed by the amendment: claims 1, 25, 27, 29-30, and 32-33 have been amended; no claims have been canceled or added. Thus, claims 1-5 and 25-33 are presently pending in this application. Applicant’s amendments to the claims have overcome each and every objection and 112b rejection made in the previous office action. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 27 August 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Van Der fails to disclose the limitation “a volume disposed in the bore between the pierceable septum and the plunger, the volume having a reduced pressure, the reduced pressure being less than atmospheric pressure.” Applicant specifies that the vacuum of Van Der would be between the plunger 4 and item 10. However, the pierceable septum of Van Der is interpreted as item 10, as seen in Figures 3A-3C. As such, the rejection in view of Van Der anticipates the limitation “a volume disposed in the bore between the pierceable septum and the plunger, the volume having a reduced pressure, the reduced pressure being less than atmospheric pressure” and the rejection is maintained as detailed below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 3-5, 25, 27-28, 30, and 32-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Van Der Jagt et al (EP 1825878, provided by applicant). Regarding claim 1, Van Der Jagt discloses: A cartridge (Fig. 1) for receiving an injectable drug (Abstract – active material), comprising: a body (2) comprising: a proximal end portion (6) comprising a proximal opening; a distal end portion (9) comprising a distal opening; a bore coupling the proximal opening and the distal opening (interior of body 2); a pierceable septum (10) coupled to the distal opening (9); a plunger (4) movably carried within the bore (¶0026); a volume disposed in the bore between the pierceable septum (10) and the plunger (4), the volume having a reduced pressure (¶0018, 0020 – the cartridge 3 is assembled and sealed within a vacuum chamber, resulting in the volume within the cartridge 3 having a vacuum within), the reduced pressure being less than atmospheric pressure (¶0020 - vacuum); and a stopper (5) detachably coupled to the proximal opening (6). Regarding claim 3, Van Der Jagt discloses: The cartridge of claim 1, further comprising a seal (11) coupled to the distal end portion (9) and covering the pierceable septum (10). Regarding claim 4, Van Der Jagt discloses: The cartridge of claim 1, further comprising a nut (8) detachably coupled to the proximal end portion (6) and securing the stopper (5) between the nut (8) and the plunger (4). Regarding claim 5, Van Der Jagt discloses: The cartridge of claim 1, wherein the plunger (4) is configured to couple to an actuating rod upon detachment of the stopper from the body (the plunger 4 is demonstrated as being coupled to an actuating rod 22 from the distal opening, and so is fully capable of being coupled to an actuating rod from the proximal open end if the stopper 5 were removed). Regarding claim 25, Van Der Jagt discloses: A cartridge (Fig. 1) for receiving an injectable drug (Abstract – active material), comprising: a body (2) comprising a proximal opening (6) and a distal opening (9), and a bore (interior of body 2) coupling the proximal opening (6) and the distal opening (9); a pierceable septum (10) coupled to the distal opening (9); a plunger (4) movably carried within the bore (¶0026); a volume disposed in the bore between the pierceable septum (10) and the plunger (4), the volume having a reduced pressure that is less than atmospheric pressure (¶0018, 0020 – the cartridge 3 is assembled and sealed within a vacuum chamber, resulting in the volume within the cartridge 3 having a vacuum within); and a stopper (11) detachably coupled to the proximal opening (6), wherein the plunger (4) is configured to couple to an actuating rod upon detachment of the stopper from the body (the plunger 4 is demonstrated as being coupled to an actuating rod 22 from the distal opening, and so is fully capable of being coupled to an actuating rod from the proximal open end if the stopper 5 were removed). Regarding claim 27, Van Der Jagt discloses: The cartridge of claim 25, further comprising a seal (11) coupled to a distal end portion (9) of the cartridge (2) and configured to cover the pierceable septum (10). Regarding claim 28, Van Der Jagt discloses: The cartridge of claim 25, further comprising a nut (8) detachably coupled to a proximal end portion (6) of the body (2), the nut configured to secure the stopper (5) between the nut (8) and the plunger (4) Regarding claim 30, Van Der Jagt discloses: A cartridge (Fig. 1) for receiving an injectable drug (Abstract – active material), comprising: a body (2) comprising a proximal opening (6) and a distal opening (9), and a bore (interior of body 2) coupling the proximal opening (6) and the distal opening (9); a pierceable septum (10) coupled to the distal opening (9); a plunger (4) movably carried within the bore (¶0026); a volume disposed in the bore between the pierceable septum (10) and the plunger (4), the volume having a reduced pressure that is less than atmospheric pressure (¶0018, 0020 – the cartridge 3 is assembled and sealed within a vacuum chamber, resulting in the volume within the cartridge 3 having a vacuum within); a vacuum stopper (11) detachably coupled to the proximal opening (6); and a nut (8) detachably coupled to a proximal end portion (6) of the body (2), the nut (2) configured to secure the stopper between the nut and the plunger. Regarding claim 32, Van Der Jagt discloses: The cartridge of claim 31, further comprising a seal (11) coupled to a distal end portion (9) of the cartridge (2) and configured to cover the pierceable septum (10). Regarding claim 33, Van Der Jagt discloses: The cartridge of claim 30, wherein the plunger (4) is configured to couple to an actuating rod upon detachment of the stopper from the body (the plunger 4 is demonstrated as being coupled to an actuating rod 22 from the distal opening, and so is fully capable of being coupled to an actuating rod from the proximal open end if the stopper 5 were removed), the actuating rod configured to move the plunger to expel gas (examiner notes that the actuating rod is functionally claimed and as such is fully capable of moving the plunger to expel gas if the device is filled with gas). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 2, 26, and 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Van Der Jagt in view of Kuhn (US 2015/0013827). Regarding claim 2, Van Der Jagt discloses the cartridge of claim 1 but is silent regarding “the volume comprises a gas having the reduced pressure.” However, Kuhn teaches a reservoir for drug delivery, thus being in the same field of endeavor, that is filled to provide a reduced pressure within the reservoir such that the gas pressure within the reservoir is at a pressure less than 200 mbar and may even create a vacuum (¶0007-0010). A pressure of 200 mbar is less than atmospheric pressure. Such a reduced pressure reduces gas or air within the drug itself (¶0015). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided the cartridge of Van Der Jagt with a gas having the reduced pressure as taught by Kuhn rather than a vacuum because such a modification would be the result of a simple substitution of one known element (a filling process that results in having a gas at the reduced pressure of Kuhn) for another known element (a filling process that results in a vacuum of Van Der Jagt) to obtain predictable results (providing a cartridge with a drug with minimized air). Claims 26 and 31 would be similarly obvious to modify to incorporate “a gas having the reduced pressure.” Claim 29 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Van Der Jagt in view of Cohen (US 3577980). Regarding claim 29, Van Der Jagt discloses the cartridge of claim 25 but is silent regarding “comprising the actuating rod, wherein the actuating rod is threadably coupled to the plunger.” However, Cohen teaches a cartridge (10; Fig. 3) for drug delivery, thus being in the same field of endeavor, with a plunger (24) that is connected to an actuating rod (26) using a threaded connection (Col. 2:12-19). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided a threaded connection between the plunger and an actuating rod as taught by Cohen to provide sufficient structure to connect the two elements during drug delivery. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TASNIM M AHMED whose telephone number is (571)272-9536. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm Pacific time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bhisma Mehta can be reached at (571)272-3383. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TASNIM MEHJABIN AHMED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 22, 2023
Application Filed
May 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 27, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746334
DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE HAVING REMOVABLE CAP
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746085
MASTER DEVICE FOR VASCULAR INTERVENTION PROCEDURE
1y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741064
TUBING COMPONENTS FOR A PARTICULATE MATERIAL DELIVERY AND METHODS OF FORMING
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734304
Modular system for a drug delivery device with electronic and corresponding modules and method
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734303
Switch Assembly for an Electronic System of a Drug Delivery Device
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+5.2%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 449 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month