Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/547,955

OPTICAL FIBER CUTTING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 25, 2023
Priority
Feb 26, 2021 — JP 2021-030264 +1 more
Examiner
CHU, CHRIS H
Art Unit
2874
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
62%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allowance Rate
350 granted / 659 resolved
-14.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
701
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
94.4%
+54.4% vs TC avg
§102
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§112
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 659 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on April 3, 2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment Applicant’s Amendment filed April 3, 2026 has been fully considered and entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zhao et al. (US 2015/0323740 A1) in view of Sasaki et al. (US 6,801,705 B2). Regarding claim 1, Zhao discloses an optical fiber cutting device for cutting an optical fiber, the optical fiber cutting device comprising: a main body (Figs. 1-2) having a positioning portion (3) configured to position the optical fiber and a first magnet (7 in Fig. 3; paragraphs 0035-0036); and a moving part (4) having a blade portion (5) configured to put a scratch on the optical fiber (paragraph 0034) and a second magnet (6), and attached to the main body to be movable between a first position (Fig. 3; position where magnet 6 faces magnet 8) and a second position (Fig. 3; position where magnet 6 faces magnet 7), wherein the blade portion is capable of putting a scratch on the optical fiber while the moving part is moved from the first position to the second position (paragraphs 0041-0042, 0048-0049), wherein the main body further has a magnetic metal (8), wherein when the moving part is located at the first position, the magnetic metal is located at a position facing the second magnet, and an attractive force between the second magnet and the magnetic metal causes the moving part to stop at the first position (paragraphs 0035, 0042, 0049), and wherein when the moving part is located at the second position, the second magnet is located at a position at which the respective same polarity sides of the second magnet and the first magnet face each other (paragraphs 0035-0036) and which is closer to the first magnet than the magnetic metal (see Fig. 3). Still regarding claim 1, Zhao teaches the claimed invention except for the first magnet and the second magnet are partially, but not completely, overlapped with each other. Sasaki discloses an optical fiber cutting device comprising a first magnet (36 in Fig. 13) and a second magnet (33), wherein when a moving part (25) is at a second position (position circle 6 at the top of Fig. 13), the second magnet is located at a position at which the respective same polarity sides of the second magnet and the first magnet are partially, but not completely, overlapped with each other, and at which a distance between the overlapped second magnet (33) and a magnetic metal (37) is shorter than a distance between the overlapped first metal (36) and the magnetic metal (see column 14, lines 29-57 describing the positions along the path; at position 6 second magnet 33 will be partially but not completely overlapped with first magnet 36 and be at a shorter distance from magnetic metal 37 than first magnet 36). Since both of the inventions relate to optical devices, one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention would have found it obvious to have the first magnet and the second magnet partially overlapped with each other as disclosed by Sasaki in the optical fiber cutting device of Zhao for the purpose of enhancing the attracting or repelling force. Regarding claim 3, Zhao discloses the main body includes a top plate portion (plate on which groove 3 is disposed in Fig. 1), and the positioning portion (3) is provided on an upper surface of the top plate portion. Regarding claim 4, Zhao discloses the positioning portion (3) includes a recess (fiber placing groove 3 is a recess) provided on the upper surface of the top plate portion. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments, see pages 5-6, with respect to claims have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. However, in order to expedite the prosecution of the application, the relevant portions of Applicant’s remarks will be addressed. On page 6, Applicant states that Sasaki shows that the magnets are completely overlapped with each other. However, the rejection is now made under Fig. 13 of Sasaki. Fig. 13 (see also column 14, lines 29-57) describes the positions along the path. Specifically, when the second magnet 33 is located at position 6, the second magnet 33 will be partially but not completely overlapped with first magnet 36 and be at a shorter distance from magnetic metal 37 than first magnet 36. Thus, by virtue of Sasaki showing discrete positions along the path, the second magnet located at position 6 still results in a prima facie rejection of the claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRIS H CHU whose telephone number is (571)272-8655. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri 9AM-5PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uyen-Chau Le can be reached on 571-272-239797. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Any inquiry of a general or clerical nature should be directed to the Technology Center 2800 receptionist at telephone number (571) 272-1562. Chris H. Chu /CHRIS H CHU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2874 April 13, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Jun 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 26, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 03, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 02, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 02, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681250
INTERPOSER WITH PLANAR SIDEWALL SURFACE FOR OPTICAL COUPLING AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669666
OPTICAL FIBER CABLE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663589
WAVEGUIDE ANTENNA
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663578
OPTICAL FIBER CABLE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12645021
Optical Apparatus, Modules and Devices
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
62%
With Interview (+9.0%)
3y 0m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 659 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month