Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
Claim(s) 1-13 and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Qi (PGPub No. 20200089356) in further view of Cok (PGPub No. 20210375979).
Regarding claim 1, Qi teaches a light-emitting substrate, comprising: a base substrate provided with a display area; a first conductive layer on the base substrate; wherein the first conductive layer comprises a plurality of common voltage lines and a plurality of first connection lines arranged at intervals (Figs. 2(a) and 2(c) point to embodiments of a touch display substrate comprising a base substrate 60 and a touch layer 20 (first conductive layer) including a plurality of second touch electrodes 202 (common voltage lines) and a plurality of first touch electrodes 201 (first connection lines).); and the plurality of common voltage lines extend along a first direction and are arranged along a second direction (Fig. 4 points to a schematic view of the second touch electrodes 202 (common voltage lines) which are arranged horizontally along a first direction (second direction) and extend vertically along a second direction (first direction).); a first insulating layer on a side, away from the base substrate, of the first conductive layer (Figs. 2(a) and 2(c), along with [0063], point to a black matrix 301 (first insulating layer) which is an insulating material.); and a second conductive layer on a side, away from the base substrate, of the first insulating layer; wherein the second conductive layer comprises a plurality of first bridge portions arranged at intervals from each other (Id. points to bridges 203.); wherein at least one of the plurality of common voltage lines comprises a plurality of signal line segments arranged at intervals; in a same common voltage line, two adjacent signal line segments are electrically connected through the first bridge portion, and at least one first connection line is at a line segment gap between the two adjacent signal line segments (Figs. 2(a) and 2(c), along with [0108], point to the bridges 203 connecting and in communication with adjacent second touch electrodes 202 (common voltage lines) around the first touch electrode 201 (first connection line) that is positioned between (line segment gap). It is considered obvious that said communication between the bridge(s) and second touch electrodes would be established by the formation of signal lines/signal line segments.); and at the line segment gap between the two adjacent signal line segments in the common voltage line, an orthographic projection of the first bridge portion on the base substrate overlaps with an orthographic projection of the first connection line on the base substrate (Figs. 2(a) and 2(c) point to the bridge(s) 203 and the first touch electrode(s) 201 (first connection line(s).).
Qi fails to teach wherein the display area comprises a plurality of light-emitting cells arranged in rows and columns, and each of the plurality of light-emitting cells comprises a driving circuit and a plurality of light-emitting elements; wherein the driving circuit comprises a common voltage terminal and an output terminal, and the plurality of light-emitting elements are sequentially connected in series between a driving voltage terminal and the output terminal.
Cok teaches wherein the display area comprises a plurality of light-emitting cells arranged in rows and columns, and each of the plurality of light-emitting cells comprises a driving circuit and a plurality of light-emitting elements; wherein the driving circuit comprises a common voltage terminal and an output terminal, and the plurality of light-emitting elements are sequentially connected in series between a driving voltage terminal and the output terminal, and the common voltage terminal is electrically connected to the common voltage line to provide a voltage to the common voltage terminal of the driving circuit through the common voltage line (Figs. 30-31 point to an active-matrix display comprising a plurality of pixels 60 (light-emitting cells), LEDs 20R (light-emitting elements), a pixel controller 66 (common voltage terminal), and a rightmost ground signal 56 (output terminal), and a common voltage signal 54 (common voltage line).). Thus, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) prior to the filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Qi and Cok, such that the display area further comprises a plurality of light-emitting cells in order to create a full-color display.
Regarding claim 2, Qi teaches wherein an electric field is between the first bridge portion and the first connection line of which orthographic projections on the base substrate overlap; and a direction of the electric field points from the first conductive layer to the second conductive layer (Figs. 2(a) and 2(c) point to the bridge(s) 203 and the first touch electrode(s) 2011/201 (first connection line(s)). [0066] and [0070] further point to the first touch electrode 201 comprising a transparent conductive material and the bridge 203 comprising copper. In light of Qi teaching a structure that is substantially the same to the one disclosed in the claimed invention in terms of both positioning and material composition, it is considered obvious that the generation of an electric field as disclosed above would also occur in the structure taught by Qi.).
Regarding claim 3, Qi teaches wherein the second conductive layer further comprises a first connection part and a second connection part arranged at intervals from each other; and a first terminal of the first connection line is electrically connected to the first connection part through a first via hole, and a second terminal of the first connection line is electrically connected to the second connection part through a second via hole; wherein the first via hole and the second via hole penetrate the first insulating layer (Figs. 11 and 12 point to the plurality of directly connected first touch electrode(s) 201 (first connection line) and bridge holes 303 which penetrate the black matrix 301 (insulating layer). It is considered obvious that connections (first connection part; second connection part) would be formed with the plurality of electrodes 201 (first connection line) in order to, for example, establish communication with other components. It is also considered obvious that one of ordinary skill in the art would form such connections by forming additional holes (first via hole, second via hole) similar to the bridge holes 303, but positioned such that they penetrate the black matrix 301 (insulating layer) according to the positions of the underlying electrode(s) 201 (first connection line).).
Regarding claim 4, Qi teaches wherein the orthographic projection of the first connection line on the base substrate covers an orthographic projection of the first via hole on the base substrate, and an orthographic projection of the first connection part on the base substrate covers the orthographic projection of the first via hole on the base substrate; and the orthographic projection of the first connection line on the base substrate covers an orthographic projection of the second via hole on the base substrate, and an orthographic projection of the second connection part on the base substrate covers the orthographic projection of the second via hole on the base substrate (It is considered obvious that one of ordinary skill in the art would vertically stack each of the components (i.e., have their orthographic projections overlap with one another) in order to reduce the critical dimensions of the device while retaining the direct connection between the first connection line, first/second via hole, and corresponding first/second connection part.).
Regarding claim 5, Qi teaches wherein a width in the first direction of an area where the first connection part covers the first via hole is greater than a width of the first connection line in the first direction; and a width in the first direction of an area where the second connection part covers the second via hole is greater than the width of the first connection line in the first direction (It is considered obvious that one of ordinary skill in the art would ensure that the widths of both connection parts were each greater than the widths of the corresponding via hole in order to completely surround said via hole and create a stable electrical connection between the connection parts, via holes, and the underlying first connection line.).
Regarding claim 6, Qi teaches wherein a width of the first bridge portion in the first direction ranges from 100 microns to 250 microns; and the width of the first connection line in the first direction ranges from 0.6 microns to 2.5 microns (Fig. 2 (c) points to the horizontal widths of the bridge 203 (first bridge portion) and the first touch electrode 2011/201 (first connection line. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized the exact widths of the first bridge portion and the first connection line to be a result effective variable affecting the communication time between the second touch electrodes 2021/202 (common voltage lines) and/or the critical dimensions of the overall structure. Thus, it would have been obvious to modify the device of Qi to have the corresponding widths within the claimed ranges, and since optimum or workable ranges of such variables are discoverable through routine experimentation. See MPEP 2144.05(II)(B) and 2143. Furthermore, it has also been held that the applicant must show that a particular range is critical, generally by showing that the claimed range achieves unexpected results relative to the prior art range. In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 1578, 16 USPQ2d 1934, 1936, (Fed. Cir. 1990). Note that the law is replete with cases in which when the mere difference between the claimed invention and the prior art is some dimensional limitation or other variable within the claims, patentability cannot be found. The instant disclosure does not set forth evidence ascribing unexpected results due to the claimed dimensions. See Gardner v. TEC Systems, Inc., 725 F.2d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 1984), which held that the dimensional limitations failed to point out a feature which performed and operated any differently from the prior art.).
Regarding claim 7, Qi teaches wherein a length of the first connection line in the second direction is greater than a length of the first bridge portion in the second direction (In light of claim 3, upon which claim 7 depends, it is considered obvious that the length of the first connection line would be greater than the length of the overhanging first bridge portion in order to allow for the formation of the first and second via holes which connect the first connection line to the first and second connection parts also positioned above said line.).
Regarding claim 8, Qi teaches wherein a first gap is between a side of the first bridge portion extending to the first connection part and the first connection part; a second gap is between a side of the first bridge portion extending to the second connection part and the second connection part (It is considered obvious that one of ordinary skill would physically separate (first gap; second gap) the first bridge portion from the first and second connection parts in order to avoid electrical interference.); and at least one of a width of the first gap or a width of the second gap ranges from 20 microns to 50 microns (One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized the width of each gap to be a result effective variable affecting the electrical interference created between the first bridge portion and first & second connection parts. Thus, it would have been obvious to modify the device of Qi to have the widths of the first and second gaps within the claimed range, and since optimum or workable ranges of such variables are discoverable through routine experimentation. See MPEP 2144.05(II)(B) and 2143. Furthermore, it has also been held that the applicant must show that a particular range is critical, generally by showing that the claimed range achieves unexpected results relative to the prior art range. In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 1578, 16 USPQ2d 1934, 1936, (Fed. Cir. 1990). Note that the law is replete with cases in which when the mere difference between the claimed invention and the prior art is some dimensional limitation or other variable within the claims, patentability cannot be found. The instant disclosure does not set forth evidence ascribing unexpected results due to the claimed dimensions. See Gardner v. TEC Systems, Inc., 725 F.2d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 1984), which held that the dimensional limitations failed to point out a feature which performed and operated any differently from the prior art.).
Regarding claim 9, Qi teaches wherein a width of a gap between the first connection line and the signal line segment in the first direction ranges from 20 microns to 50 microns (Figs. 2(a) and 2(c) point to the first touch electrode 301 (first connection line) and the second touch electrode 202 (signal line segment) which are physically separated from one another (a gap). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized the width of the gap to be a result effective variable affecting the level of electrical isolation. Thus, it would have been obvious to modify the device of Qi to have the gap width within the claimed range in order to properly isolate and/or insulate the first connection line and the signal line segment from one another, and since optimum or workable ranges of such variables are discoverable through routine experimentation. See MPEP 2144.05(II)(B) and 2143. Furthermore, it has also been held that the applicant must show that a particular range is critical, generally by showing that the claimed range achieves unexpected results relative to the prior art range. In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 1578, 16 USPQ2d 1934, 1936, (Fed. Cir. 1990). Note that the law is replete with cases in which when the mere difference between the claimed invention and the prior art is some dimensional limitation or other variable within the claims, patentability cannot be found. The instant disclosure does not set forth evidence ascribing unexpected results due to the claimed dimensions. See Gardner v. TEC Systems, Inc., 725 F.2d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 1984), which held that the dimensional limitations failed to point out a feature which performed and operated any differently from the prior art.).
Regarding claim 10, Qi teaches wherein in a direction perpendicular to a plane where the base substrate is located, a thickness of the first bridge portion is greater than or equal to a thickness of a first connection part and a second connection part in the second conductive layer (It is considered obvious that one of ordinary skill in the art would form the first bridge portion, first connection part, and the second connection part such that they each have a thickness equal to each other in order to create a uniform second conductive layer that would simplify the fabrication process and/or optimize the critical dimensions of the overall structure.).
Regarding claim 11, Qi teaches wherein the second conductive layer further comprises a plurality of pads; one terminal of a first connection part is electrically connected to one of the plurality of pads, and another terminal of the first connection part is electrically connected to a first terminal of the first connection line; and one terminal of a second connection part is electrically connected to another pad of the plurality of pads, and another terminal of the second connection part is electrically connected to a second terminal of the first connection line (Figs. 11 and 12 point to the plurality of directly connected first touch electrode(s) 201 (first connection line) and bridge holes 303 which penetrate the black matrix 301 (insulating layer). It is considered obvious that connections (first connection part; second connection part), as well as a plurality of pads, would be formed in order to, for example, form an interconnect path and allow communication between the plurality of electrodes 201 (first connection line) and other components while maintaining a level of design flexibility that could not come from direct bonding.
Regarding claim 12, Cok teaches wherein the plurality of common voltage lines are located in the display area (Fig. 31 points to a display or lamp 80 comprising a plurality of lines connected to the common voltage signal 54.); pads are electrically connected to at least one of the plurality of light-emitting elements and the driving circuit (Figs. 30 and 32 point to a plurality of pixel controllers 66 (pads).); the plurality of light-emitting elements in the light-emitting cell are divided into M element groups; each of the element groups comprises N light-emitting elements arranged along the first direction; the M element groups are arranged along the second direction; N is an integer greater than 0; and M is an integer greater than 2 (One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized the number of rows (M element groups) and columns (N light-emitting elements) of a plurality of light-emitting elements to be a result effective variable. Thus, it would have been obvious to modify the device of Cok to have a number of rows and columns within the claimed range in order to create a structured array whose critical dimensions can be adjusted according to a specific application, and since optimum or workable ranges of such variables are discoverable through routine experimentation. See MPEP 2144.05(II)(B) and 2143. Furthermore, it has also been held that the applicant must show that a particular range is critical, generally by showing that the claimed range achieves unexpected results relative to the prior art range. In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 1578, 16 USPQ2d 1934, 1936, (Fed. Cir. 1990). Note that the law is replete with cases in which when the mere difference between the claimed invention and the prior art is some dimensional limitation or other variable within the claims, patentability cannot be found. The instant disclosure does not set forth evidence ascribing unexpected results due to the claimed dimensions. See Gardner v. TEC Systems, Inc., 725 F.2d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 1984), which held that the dimensional limitations failed to point out a feature which performed and operated any differently from the prior art.); a plurality of element groups are numbered sequentially along an order of pointing from the drive voltage terminal to the output terminal; a first light-emitting element in an element group numbered 1 is electrically connected to the driving voltage terminal; a first light-emitting element in an element group numbered k is electrically connected to a first light-emitting element in an element group numbered k+1 through the first connection line; wherein 1<k<M and k is an integer (This is interpreted as disclosing a structure where each element group is connected in series to the driving voltage terminal, specifically through the first light-emitting element of each element group. Figs. 27-30 and [0009] point to multiple embodiments of a multi-LED structure(s) comprising LEDs that are electrically connected in any combination of series and parallel for any combination of LEDs. In light of this, it is considered obvious that one of ordinary skill in the art would form an alternative multi-LED structure such that the control signal 52 (driving voltage terminal) is connected in series to each of the first LEDs 20 (light-emitting element) found in each row in order to create an array where each LED/element receives the same current and the overall structure is simplified due to only requiring a single driving terminal.); a last light-emitting element in an element group numbered M is electrically connected to the output terminal (Figs. 27-30 point to the ground signal 56 (output terminal).); and one column of light-emitting cells of the plurality of light-emitting cells arranged in rows and columns corresponds to one common voltage line of the plurality of common voltage lines, and the one common voltage line is located between the element group numbered k and the element group numbered k+1 in the one column of light-emitting cells (Fig. 31 points to a display or lamp 80 comprising a pixel array 68 (plurality of light-emitting cells) arranged such that each row/column is connected to the common voltage signal 54 (common voltage line) via individual lines (one common voltage line). It is considered obvious that one of ordinary skill in the art would rearrange the individual line(s) such that it is located between two element groups in order to adjust the electrical connection between each cell within the group and the common voltage line, for example by connecting each component in parallel rather than in series.). Thus, it would have been obvious to a POSITA prior to the filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Qi and Cok, such that the plurality of light-emitting elements is arranged into groups of rows/columns that are connected in series between the driving voltage terminal and the output terminal in order to create a simplified full-color display that runs the same current throughout the overall structure and only requires two terminals.
Regarding claim 13, Cok teaches wherein the second conductive layer further comprises a plurality of series wires arranged at intervals (Figs. 27-30 points to multi-LED structures comprising a plurality of LEDs 20 connected in series (series wires).); light-emitting elements in a same element group are electrically connected in series through the plurality of series wires; a last light-emitting element in the element group numbered k-1 is electrically connected to a last light-emitting element in the element group numbered k through the series wire (Figs. 27-30 and [0009] point to multiple embodiments of a multi-LED structure(s) comprising LEDs that are electrically connected in any combination of series (series wires) and parallel for any combination of LEDs. In light of this, it is considered obvious that one of ordinary skill in the art would form an alternative multi-LED structure such that the last LED/element found in each row/column is connected in series to each other in order to create an array where each LED/element receives the same current and the overall structure is simplified due to only requiring a single input and output.); and orthographic projections of the plurality of common voltage lines on the base substrate do not overlap with orthographic projections of the plurality of series wires on the base substrate (It is considered obvious that one of ordinary skill in the art would not overlap the common voltage lines and series wires in order to reduce/avoid interference between the two components.). Thus, it would have been obvious to a POSITA prior to the filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Qi and Cok, such that the plurality of light-emitting elements further includes a plurality of series wires in order to create a simplified full-color display that runs the same current throughout the overall structure and only requires two terminals.
Regarding claim 17, Qi teaches a display apparatus (Fig. 7 points to a structure of an OLED (Organic Light-Emitting Diode) touch display apparatus or a QLED (Quantum dot Light-Emitting Display) touch display apparatus.), comprising the light-emitting substrate according to claim 1 (see discussion of claim 1 above.).
Regarding claim 18, Qi teaches wherein the first conductive layer is further provided with a driving voltage line ([0065] points to alternative embodiments for the first and second touch electrodes 201/202 (first conductive layer), such that, for example, one of the first touch electrodes 201 is a driving electrode Tx (driving voltage line).), and a width of the common voltage line in the second direction is greater than a width of the driving voltage line in the second direction (It is considered obvious that the width of the common voltage line would be greater than that of the driving voltage line in order to deal with the higher current requirements and the issues of impedance, noise, and/or heat dissipation that come with it.).
Regarding claim 19, Qi teaches wherein the width of the first gap and the width of the second gap is equal (It is considered obvious that one of ordinary skill in the art would form both gaps such that they have equal widths in order to simplify the fabrication process and/or provide a sense of symmetry in regards to the first bridge portion and the first and second connection parts.).
Regarding claim 20, Qi teaches wherein a thickness of the first bridge portion is equal to a thickness of the first connection part and is equal to a thickness of the second connection part (It is considered obvious that one of ordinary skill in the art would form the second conductive layer (i.e., the first bridge portion, first connection part, and second connection part) to have an equal, uniform thickness in order to simplify the fabrication process and/or provide a sense of symmetry in regards to the first bridge portion and the first and second connection parts.).
Claim(s) 14-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Qi et al. in further view of Cho (PGPub No. 20210043134).
Regarding claim 14, Qi in combination with Cho teaches wherein the light-emitting substrate further comprises a fan-out area (Fig. 2 and [0125] of Cho point to a block diagram for a display device 1 comprising data lines D which may form a fan-out structure (fan-out area), e.g., the data lines D spread apart from each other in a direction from the data driver DDV toward the pixels PXL.); the first conductive layer further comprises a plurality of first fan-out lines and a plurality of second connection lines in the fan-out area; wherein one of the plurality of common voltage lines is electrically connected to one of the plurality of first fan-out lines (Figs. 2(a) and 2(c) of Qi point to embodiments of a touch display substrate comprising a plurality of second touch electrodes 202 (common voltage lines; first fan-out lines) and a plurality of first touch electrodes 201 (second connection lines). It is considered obvious that one of ordinary skill in the art could form the fan-out area of Cho by simply replicating and/or extending the existing structures of Qi into said area.); the first fan-out line comprises a first sub-fan-out line and a second sub-fan-out line; the first sub-fan-out line extends along the first direction; and the second sub-fan-out line extends along the second direction (It is considered obvious that one of ordinary skill in the art would form the first fan-out line according to the critical dimensions of the overall device, such that it includes portions shaped around the first direction (first sub-fan-out line) and portions shaped around the second direction (second sub-fan-out line).); the second conductive layer further comprises a plurality of second bridge portions in the fan-out area (Figs. 2(a) and 2(c) of Qi point to bridges 203.); the first sub-fan-out line comprises a plurality of first fan-out line segments arranged at intervals; in a same first sub-fan-out line, two adjacent first fan-out line segments are electrically connected through the second bridge portion, and at least one second connection line is at a gap between the two adjacent first fan-out line segments (Figs. 2(a) and 2(c), along with [0108], of Qi point to the bridges 203 connecting and in communication with adjacent second touch electrodes 202 (first fan-out lines) around the first touch electrode 201 (second connection line) that is positioned between (a gap). It is considered obvious that said communication between the bridge(s) and second touch electrodes would be established by the formation of signal lines/ line segments.); and at the gap between the two adjacent first fan-out line segments in the first sub-fan-out line, an orthographic projection of the second bridge portion on the base substrate overlaps with an orthographic projection of the second connection line on the base substrate (Figs. 2(a) and 2(c) point to the bridge(s) 203 and the first touch electrode 201 (second connection line.). Thus, it would have been obvious to a POSITA prior to the filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Qi et al. and Cho, such that a fan-out area is further formed in order to better distribute one signal to multiple destinations.
Regarding claim 15, Qi in combination with Cho teaches wherein the first conductive layer further comprises a plurality of third connection lines; the second conductive layer further comprises a plurality of third bridge portions in the fan-out area; the second sub-fan-out line comprises a plurality of second fan-out line segments arranged at intervals; in a same second sub-fan-out line, two adjacent second fan-out line segments are electrically connected through the third bridge portion, at least one third connection line is at a gap between the two adjacent second fan-out line segments; and at the gap between the two adjacent second fan-out line segments in the second sub-fan-out line, an orthographic projection of the third bridge portion on the base substrate overlaps with an orthographic projection of the third connection line on the base substrate (Fig. 2 and [0125] of Cho point to a block diagram for a display device 1 comprising data lines D which may form a fan-out structure (fan-out area), e.g., the data lines D spread apart from each other in a direction from the data driver DDV toward the pixels PXL. Figs. 2(a) and 2(c), along with [0108], of Qi point to the bridges 203 connecting and in communication with adjacent second touch electrodes 202 (second sub-fan-out line segments) around the first touch electrode 201 (third connection line) that is positioned between (a gap). It is considered obvious that said communication between the bridge(s) and second touch electrodes would be established by the formation of signal lines/ line segments. It is also considered obvious that one of ordinary skill in the art could further form the fan-out area by simply replicating the existing bridge/line segment structures of Qi into said area.). Thus, it would have been obvious to a POSITA prior to the filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Qi et al. and Cho, such that a fan-out area is further formed in order to better distribute one signal to multiple destinations.
Regarding claim 16, Cok teaches wherein the fan-out area comprises a plurality of light-emitting cells (Fig. 2 points to an active-matrix display comprising a plurality of pixels 60 (light-emitting cells).), wherein in the fan-out region: each of the plurality of light-emitting cells comprises a driving circuit and a plurality of light-emitting elements; wherein the driving circuit comprises a common voltage terminal and an output terminal; the plurality of light-emitting elements are sequentially connected in series between a driving voltage terminal and the output terminal (Figs. 27-30 point to multiple embodiments of a pixel 60 comprising LEDs 20 (light-emitting elements), a control signal 52 (driving voltage terminal), a common voltage signal 54 (common voltage terminal), and a rightmost ground signal 56 (output terminal).); the common voltage terminal is electrically connected to the first fan-out line (Fig. 31 shows each pixel 60 (common voltage terminal) connecting to the power signal 54 (first fan-out line).); and in at least one of the plurality of light-emitting cells, at least two of the plurality of light- emitting elements are electrically connected through the second connection line; and/or, at least two of the plurality of light-emitting elements are electrically connected through the third connection line (It is considered obvious that the choice between the second and third connection lines is based entirely on the position of the light-emitting elements within the device, i.e., whether or not the light-emitting elements are separated by the first sub-fan-out lines (second connection line) or the second sub-fan-out lines (third connection line).). Thus, it would have been obvious to a POSITA prior to the filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Qi et al. and Cok, such that the fan-out area further comprises a plurality of light-emitting cells in order to create a full-color display.
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed 06/03/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1 (and by extension any dependent claims) under 35 U.S.C. §103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Qi in further view of Cok (PGPub No. 20210375979).
Regarding Applicant’s argument that Cok fails to teach or suggest the newly amended limitations of claim 1, Examiner argues that this statement is merely conclusory and that the subject matter in question is in fact taught and/or suggested by Cok, as discussed above. Thus, Applicant’s argument is considered unpersuasive and fails to overcome the rejection.
Conclusion
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Patrick L Cullen whose telephone number is (703)756-1221. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:30AM - 5PM EST.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dale Page can be reached at (571)270-7877. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/PATRICK CULLEN/ Assistant Examiner, Art Unit 2899 /DALE E PAGE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Prosecution Insights