Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/550,738

SOLID-STATE IMAGING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 15, 2023
Priority
Mar 25, 2021 — JP 2021-051073 +1 more
Examiner
GUNBERG, EDWIN C
Art Unit
2884
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
483 granted / 620 resolved
+9.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
642
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
80.2%
+40.2% vs TC avg
§102
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 620 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 5, and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wang (2006/0274171). Regarding claim 1, Wang discloses a solid-state imaging device comprising: a pixel array unit provided with multiple unit pixels, wherein each of the unit pixels includes: a small pixel having a first photoelectric conversion unit (Figs. 5C, 5D, 5E, pixel region 250C) and a first on-chip (Wang, [0090], “pixel 250M includes microlens 320 which may be disposed on light transmissive protective layer 322.”) lens configured to allow light to enter the first photoelectric conversion unit; and a large pixel having a second photoelectric conversion unit divided into multiple regions (Figs. 5C, 5D, 5E, pixel region 250M), and a second on-chip lens capable of condensing more light than the first on-chip lens, the second on-chip lens being configured to allow light to enter the second photoelectric conversion unit. (Wang, Fig. 3D, [0092]) Regarding claim 3, Wang further discloses the solid-state imaging device according to claim 1, wherein the second photoelectric conversion unit is divided into the multiple regions by an N-type impurity region. (Fig. 3A, photodetector 302 as distinct from P-type substrate 326) Regarding claim 5, Wang further discloses multiple transfer gates configured to transfer charges obtained in the multiple regions. (Wang, Fig. 3A) Regarding claim 11, Wang discloses an electronic device comprising: a solid-state imaging device including a pixel array unit provided with multiple unit pixels, wherein each of the unit pixels includes: a small pixel having a first photoelectric conversion unit and a first on-chip lens configured to allow light to enter the first photoelectric conversion unit; and a large pixel having a second photoelectric conversion unit divided into multiple regions, and a second on-chip lens capable of condensing more light than the first on-chip lens, the second on-chip lens being configured to allow light to enter the second photoelectric conversion unit. (Wang, Figs. 3A, 3D, 5C-E, [0090], [0092]) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 2 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang (2006/0274171). Regarding claims 2 and 4, the choice to divide the regions by P-type region, N-type region, or insulative barrier is a matter of the routine substitution of equivalents known in the art to provide the same result. See KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 82 USPQ2d 1385 (2007). Claims 6-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang (2006/0274171) in view of Dentai et al. (2003/0098490). Regarding claims 6-10, the incorporation of MIM capacitors connected to the photoelectric conversion unit is routine and well-understood in the art, see Dentai at [0016]. Including a pair of MIM capacitors to isolate RF grounds from the DC bias path would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the claimed invention. Amplification of the pixel signal is understood. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWIN C GUNBERG whose telephone number is (571)270-3107. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:30AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uzma Alam can be reached at 571-272-2995. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDWIN C GUNBERG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2884
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 15, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636521
IMAGING SYSTEM FOR A RADIOTHERAPY DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631493
INFRARED SENSOR AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12632915
METHOD OF ADJUSTING ACQUISITION PARAMETERS IN A FLUOROSCOPY SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12625282
In-Situ Beta-particle detector for High Resolution 234Th Export Measurements
1y 12m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618772
OPTICAL PHYSICAL QUANTITY MEASURING APPARATUS
2y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+6.6%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 620 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month