Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/551,648

PHOTODETECTION DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 21, 2023
Priority
Mar 31, 2021 — JP 2021-062383 +1 more
Examiner
JEAN BAPTISTE, WILNER
Art Unit
2899
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
950 granted / 1098 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1118
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
62.5%
+22.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1098 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 2. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION. The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 3. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. 4. The claims recite in multiple locations “an optical element" and "an optical system". Claims 1-8, 10-19 are to a photodetection device, while claims 9 and 20 refer to an electronic device, and from the disclosure it is unclear what structural differences if any are implied by the claimed language. Thus, the use of said language may invite confusion as to the scope of the claims. Where possible, the Examiner will interpret the limitations as being drawn to the intended use of the lines to carry “an optical element" and "an optical system". As noted, optical elements are the fundamental building blocks of optical systems. They influence light (often in the form of light beams) in controlled ways to manipulate its propagation, direction, optical intensity, or spectral composition. While specific types of optical elements are explained in depth in separate Encyclopedia articles, here we give an overview. For example, an optical element is a single component (like a lens, mirror, or filter) that manipulates light, while an optical system is a collection of these individual elements arranged together to perform a more complex function, such as creating an image in a camera or telescope, with the system's overall performance depending on the interaction between all its parts. Think of elements as building blocks and the system as the final structure built from them. If Applicant wishes to persist with this language, it is recommended Applicant claim structural features which may distinguish the key difference. If Applicant feels a telephone conversation would expedite this matter, the Examiner can be reached at the number below. Allowable Subject Matter 5. Claims 1-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Remarks: 6. The closest prior art is Lee, US 2019/0348453 A1. However, Lee does not teach or suggest a plurality of first connecting elements disposed on the plurality of connecting pads, respectively; and a substrate comprising a plurality of second connecting elements disposed on a mounting surface of the substrate, wherein the plurality of first connecting elements are electrically connected to the plurality of second connecting elements through an anisotropic conductive structure, wherein the anisotropic conductive structure is disposed between the plurality of first connecting elements and the plurality of second connecting elements, as in the claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILNER JEAN BAPTISTE whose telephone number is (571)270-7394. The examiner can normally be reached M-T 8:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dale Page can be reached at 571-270-7877. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /W.J/Examiner, Art Unit 2899 /DALE E PAGE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 21, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12708044
MEMORY STACK STRUCTURE INCLUDING POWER DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURES AND A HIGH-BANDWIDTH MEMORY INCLUDING THE MEMORY STACK STRUCTURE
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707842
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707695
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12696811
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690438
VIA FORMED IN A WAFER USING A FRONT-SIDE AND A BACK-SIDE PROCESS
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+5.1%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1098 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month