DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Priority
Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55.
Response to Amendment
The amendment filed on 25 September 2023 has been entered.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claims 1, 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fujita (US 2014/0312339 A1).
With respect to claim 1: Fujita teaches “a display apparatus (10) comprising a first pixel (17 or 19) and a second pixel (19 or 21) arranged to be adjacent to the first pixel (see Fig. 1), wherein the first pixel comprises a first light-emitting element (15 in 17 or 19; see Fig. 1) comprising a first pixel electrode (12), a first EL layer (35) over the first pixel electrode (see Fig. 1), and a common electrode (13) over the first EL layer (see Fig. 1), and a first color conversion layer (26 or 27) over the first light-emitting element (see Fig. 1), wherein the second pixel comprises a second light-emitting element (15 in 19 or 21; see Fig. 1) comprising a second pixel electrode (12), a second EL layer over the second pixel electrode (25), and the common electrode over the second EL layer (13), and a second color conversion layer over the second light-emitting element (20 or 27), wherein the first light-emitting element and the second light-emitting element are each configured to emit blue light (paragraph 73), wherein the first color conversion layer is configured to convert light emitted from the first light-emitting element into light with different wavelengths (paragraph 71), wherein the second color conversion layer is configured to convert light emitted from the second light-emitting element into light with different wavelengths (paragraph 71), wherein the first pixel and the second pixel exhibit different colors (paragraph 71), and wherein a side surface of the first pixel electrode, a side surface of the first EL layer, a side surface of the second pixel electrode, and a side surface of the second EL layer each comprise a region (see Fig. 1) in contact with a first insulating layer (22)”.
With respect to claim 8: Fujita teaches “The display apparatus according to claim 1 (see above), wherein the first color conversion layer and the second color conversion layer each comprise a phosphor (paragraph 186)”.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujita as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Yang et al. (US 2021/0091152 A1).
With respect to claim 6: Fujita teaches “The display apparatus according to claim 1(see above)”.
Fujita further teaches “wherein the first EL layer comprises a first light-emitting layer (35), a first charge-generation layer over the first light-emitting layer (34 or 36), wherein the second EL layer comprises a third light-emitting layer (35), a second charge- generation layer over the third light-emitting layer (34 or 36), wherein the first charge-generation layer and the second charge-generation layer comprise the same material (paragraphs 118, 143-146), and wherein the first insulating layer comprises at least a region in contact with a side surface of the first charge-generation layer and a region in contact with a side surface of the second charge-generation layer (see Fig. 1), wherein the first light-emitting layer and the third light-emitting layer comprise the same material (paragraphs 131-134)”.
Fujita does not specifically teach “a second light-emitting layer over the first charge-generation layer, and a fourth light-emitting layer over the second charge-generation layer, wherein the second light-emitting layer and the fourth light-emitting layer comprise the same material”.
However, Yang teaches “a second light-emitting layer (433) over the first charge- generation layer (432), and a fourth light-emitting layer (435) over the second charge-generation layer (434)”.
It would have been obvious at the time the application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Fujita with the stacked pixel structure of Yang in order to obtain high resolution (Yang paragraph 79).
Fujita uses the same material as the light emitting layer in each pixel (paragraph 134), thus suggesting “wherein the second light-emitting layer and the fourth light-emitting layer comprise the same material” when the extra layers taught by Yang are combined therewith due to the art recognized suitability of the material taught by Fujita as a light emitting layer for each pixel of the device (Fujita paragraph 134).
Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujita as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Joo et al. (US 2021/0175291 A1).
With respect to claim 7: Fujita teaches “The display apparatus according to claim 1(see above)”.
Fujita does not specifically teach “wherein the first color conversion layer and the second color conversion layer each comprise a quantum dot”.
However, Joo teaches “wherein the first color conversion layer (CCF-R) and the second color conversion layer (CCF-G) each comprise a quantum dot (EP-G, EP-R; see paragraph 109)”.
It would have been obvious at the time the application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Fujita by substituting the quantum dots taught by Joo with the phosphors due to the art recognized equivalence of quantum dots and phosphors for the purpose of color conversion (Joo paragraph 109).
Claims 2, 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujita in view of Rhee et al. (US 20060197086 A1).
With respect to claim 2: Fujita teaches “a display apparatus (10) comprising a first pixel (17 or 19) and a second pixel (19 or 21) arranged to be adjacent to the first pixel (see Fig. 1), wherein the first pixel comprises a first light-emitting element (15 in 17 or 19; see Fig. 1) comprising a first pixel electrode (12), a first EL layer (35) over the first pixel electrode (see Fig. 1), and a common electrode (13) over the first EL layer (see Fig. 1), and a first color conversion layer (26 or 27) over the first light-emitting element (see Fig. 1), wherein the second pixel comprises a second light-emitting element (15 in 19 or 21; see Fig. 1) comprising a second pixel electrode (12), a second EL layer over the second pixel electrode (25), and the common electrode over the second EL layer (13), and a second color conversion layer over the second light-emitting element (20 or 27), wherein the first light-emitting element and the second light-emitting element are each configured to emit blue light (paragraph 73), wherein the first color conversion layer is configured to convert light emitted from the first light-emitting element into light with different wavelengths (paragraph 71), wherein the second color conversion layer is configured to convert light emitted from the second light-emitting element into light with different wavelengths (paragraph 71), wherein the first pixel and the second pixel exhibit different colors (paragraph 71), and wherein a side surface of the first pixel electrode, a side surface of the first EL layer, a side surface of the second pixel electrode, and a side surface of the second EL layer each comprise a region (see Fig. 1) in contact with a first insulating layer (22), wherein the first insulating layer comprises an inorganic material (paragraph 167)”.
Fujita does not specifically teach “wherein a second insulating layer provided over and in contact with the first insulating layer and positioned below the common electrode is included, and wherein the second insulating layer comprises an organic material”.
However, Rhee teaches “wherein a second insulating layer (361q) provided over and in contact with the first insulating layer (361p) and positioned below the common electrode (270) is included, and wherein the second insulating layer comprises an organic material (paragraph 68)”.
It would have been obvious at the time the application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Fujita by adding a second organic insulating layer as taught by Rhee in order to impart hydrophobic characteristics to the insulating layer to confine the EL layer (Rhee paragraphs 68-69).
With respect to claim 11: Fujita in view of Rhee teaches “The display apparatus according to claim 2 (see above)”.
Fujita further teaches “wherein the first color conversion layer and the second color conversion layer each comprise a phosphor (paragraph 186)”.
Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujita in view of Rhee as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Yang.
With respect to claim 9: Fujita in view of Rhee teaches “The display apparatus according to claim 2 (see above)”.
Fujita further teaches “wherein the first EL layer comprises a first light-emitting layer (35), a first charge-generation layer over the first light-emitting layer (34 or 36), wherein the second EL layer comprises a third light-emitting layer (35), a second charge- generation layer over the third light-emitting layer (34 or 36), wherein the first charge-generation layer and the second charge-generation layer comprise the same material (paragraphs 118, 143-146), and wherein the first insulating layer comprises at least a region in contact with a side surface of the first charge-generation layer and a region in contact with a side surface of the second charge-generation layer (see Fig. 1), wherein the first light-emitting layer and the third light-emitting layer comprise the same material (paragraphs 131-134)”.
Fujita does not specifically teach “a second light-emitting layer over the first charge-generation layer, and a fourth light-emitting layer over the second charge-generation layer, wherein the second light-emitting layer and the fourth light-emitting layer comprise the same material”.
However, Yang teaches “a second light-emitting layer (433) over the first charge- generation layer (432), and a fourth light-emitting layer (435) over the second charge-generation layer (434)”.
It would have been obvious at the time the application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Fujita with the stacked pixel structure of Yang in order to obtain high resolution (Yang paragraph 79).
Fujita uses the same material as the light emitting layer in each pixel (paragraph 134), thus suggesting “wherein the second light-emitting layer and the fourth light-emitting layer comprise the same material” when the extra layers taught by Yang are combined therewith due to the art recognized suitability of the material taught by Fujita as a light emitting layer for each pixel of the device (Fujita paragraph 134).
Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujita in view of Rhee as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Joo.
With respect to claim 10: Fujita in view of Rhee teaches “The display apparatus according to claim 2 (see above)”.
Fujita does not specifically teach “wherein the first color conversion layer and the second color conversion layer each comprise a quantum dot”.
However, Joo teaches “wherein the first color conversion layer (CCF-R) and the second color conversion layer (CCF-G) each comprise a quantum dot (EP-G, EP-R; see paragraph 109)”.
It would have been obvious at the time the application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Fujita by substituting the quantum dots taught by Joo with the phosphors due to the art recognized equivalence of quantum dots and phosphors for the purpose of color conversion (Joo paragraph 109).
Claims 3, 5, 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujita.
With respect to claim 3: Fujita Fig. 1 embodiment teaches “a display apparatus (10) comprising a first pixel (17 or 19) and a second pixel (19 or 21) arranged to be adjacent to the first pixel (see Fig. 1), wherein the first pixel comprises a first light-emitting element (15 in 17 or 19; see Fig. 1) comprising a first pixel electrode (12), a first EL layer (35) over the first pixel electrode (see Fig. 1), and a common electrode (13) over the first EL layer (see Fig. 1), and a first color conversion layer (26 or 27) over the first light-emitting element (see Fig. 1), wherein the second pixel comprises a second light-emitting element (15 in 19 or 21; see Fig. 1) comprising a second pixel electrode (12), a second EL layer over the second pixel electrode (25), and the common electrode over the second EL layer (13), and a second color conversion layer over the second light-emitting element (20 or 27), wherein the first light-emitting element and the second light-emitting element are each configured to emit blue light (paragraph 73), wherein the first color conversion layer is configured to convert light emitted from the first light-emitting element into light with different wavelengths (paragraph 71), wherein the second color conversion layer is configured to convert light emitted from the second light-emitting element into light with different wavelengths (paragraph 71), wherein the first pixel and the second pixel exhibit different colors (paragraph 71), and wherein a side surface of the first pixel electrode, a side surface of the first EL layer, a side surface of the second pixel electrode, and a side surface of the second EL layer each comprise a region (see Fig. 1) in contact with a first insulating layer (22), wherein the first insulating layer comprises an inorganic material (paragraph 167)”
Fujita Fig. 1 does not teach “a common layer over the first EL layer, wherein a top surface of the first EL layer, a top surface of the second EL layer, and a top surface of the first insulating layer each comprise a region in contact with the common layer”.
However, in Fujita Fig. 9 embodiment, electron injection layer 37 is “a common layer over the first EL layer (35), wherein a top surface of the first EL layer (35 in 17 or 19), a top surface of the second EL layer (35 in 19 or 21), and a top surface of the first insulating layer (22) each comprise a region in contact with the common layer (see Fig. 9)”.
It would have been obvious at the time the application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Fujita by using a common electron injection layer as a substitute for multiple individual layers as an art recognized substitute for the individual layers for the purpose of transporting electrons in each of the display’s pixels (Fujita paragraph 281).
With respect to claim 5: Fujita teaches “the display apparatus according to claim 3 (see above), wherein the common layer comprises at least one of a hole-injection layer, a hole- blocking layer, a hole-transport layer, an electron-transport layer, an electron-blocking layer, and an electron-injection layer (paragraph 281)”.
With respect to claim 14: Fujita teaches “The display apparatus according to claim 3 (see above), wherein the first color conversion layer and the second color conversion layer each comprise a phosphor (paragraph 186)”.
Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujita as applied to claim 3 above, and further in view of Rhee.
With respect to claim 4: Fujita teaches “The display apparatus according to claim 3 (see above)”.
Fujita further teaches “wherein the first insulating layer comprises an inorganic material (paragraph 167), a top surface of the insulating layer comprises a region in contact with the common layer (see Fig. 9)”.
Fujita does not specifically teach “wherein a second insulating layer provided over and in contact with the first insulating layer and positioned below the common electrode is included, and wherein the second insulating layer comprises an organic material”.
However, Rhee teaches “wherein a second insulating layer (361q) provided over and in contact with the first insulating layer (361p) and positioned below the common electrode (270) is included, and wherein the second insulating layer comprises an organic material (paragraph 68)”.
It would have been obvious at the time the application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Fujita by adding a second organic insulating layer as taught by Rhee in order to impart hydrophobic characteristics to the insulating layer to confine the EL layer (Rhee paragraphs 68-69).
Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over as applied to claim 3 above, and further in view of Yang.
With respect to claim 12: Fujita teaches “The display apparatus according to claim 3 (see above)”.
Fujita further teaches “wherein the first EL layer comprises a first light-emitting layer (35), a first charge-generation layer over the first light-emitting layer (34 or 36), wherein the second EL layer comprises a third light-emitting layer (35), a second charge- generation layer over the third light-emitting layer (34 or 36), wherein the first charge-generation layer and the second charge-generation layer comprise the same material (paragraphs 118, 143-146), and wherein the first insulating layer comprises at least a region in contact with a side surface of the first charge-generation layer and a region in contact with a side surface of the second charge-generation layer (see Fig. 1), wherein the first light-emitting layer and the third light-emitting layer comprise the same material (paragraphs 131-134)”.
Fujita does not specifically teach “a second light-emitting layer over the first charge-generation layer, and a fourth light-emitting layer over the second charge-generation layer, wherein the second light-emitting layer and the fourth light-emitting layer comprise the same material”.
However, Yang teaches “a second light-emitting layer (433) over the first charge- generation layer (432), and a fourth light-emitting layer (435) over the second charge-generation layer (434)”.
It would have been obvious at the time the application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Fujita with the stacked pixel structure of Yang in order to obtain high resolution (Yang paragraph 79).
Fujita uses the same material as the light emitting layer in each pixel (paragraph 134), thus suggesting “wherein the second light-emitting layer and the fourth light-emitting layer comprise the same material” when the extra layers taught by Yang are combined therewith due to the art recognized suitability of the material taught by Fujita as a light emitting layer for each pixel of the device (Fujita paragraph 134).
Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujita as applied to claim 3 above, and further in view of Joo.
With respect to claim 13: Fujita teaches “The display apparatus according to claim 3 (see above)”.
Fujita does not specifically teach “wherein the first color conversion layer and the second color conversion layer each comprise a quantum dot”.
However, Joo teaches “wherein the first color conversion layer (CCF-R) and the second color conversion layer (CCF-G) each comprise a quantum dot (EP-G, EP-R; see paragraph 109)”.
It would have been obvious at the time the application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Fujita by substituting the quantum dots taught by Joo with the phosphors due to the art recognized equivalence of quantum dots and phosphors for the purpose of color conversion (Joo paragraph 109).
Conclusion
The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure.
Shibusawa (US 20060060853 A1), which teaches a display device.
Contact Information
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHANIEL J. LEE whose telephone number is (571)270-5721. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5 EST M-F.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ABDULMAJEED AZIZ can be reached at (571)270-5046. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/NATHANIEL J LEE/Examiner, Art Unit 2875
/ABDULMAJEED AZIZ/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2875