Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/552,459

Methods and Devices for Session Release

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 26, 2023
Priority
May 10, 2021 — CN PCT/CN2021/092915 +1 more
Examiner
BUKHARI, SIBTE H
Art Unit
2449
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
347 granted / 440 resolved
+20.9% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+35.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
460
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
§103
66.1%
+26.1% vs TC avg
§102
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 440 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims This action is in response to application filed on 7/11/2024. Claims 42-66 have been examined and are pending with this action. Priority Examiner acknowledges that the Applicant claims a priority benefit of PCT/CN2022/091888 filed on 05/10/2021. Drawings The drawings were received on 7/11/2024 and these drawings are accepted. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 9/26/2023, 1/7/2025, 3/5/2025 & 7/23/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability should not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 42,45,47-48,50-52,56-58 and 62-66 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dao (US 20190223250 A1) in view of Yao (EP 4021024 A1). As per claim 42, Dao discloses a method implemented by a first network node of a communication system (Dao: [Fig 1: 0031] “a computing and communications environment 100 that may be used for implementing the devices and methods & , the electronic device 102 may be an element of communications network infrastructure, such as a base station (for example a NodeB, an enhanced Node B (eNodeB), a next generation NodeB”), the method comprising: receiving a first multicast session release request from a second network node of the communication system (Dao: [0040] “A multicast session is a data session, in which a data source, such as an application server in a data network, sends the same data to multiple targeted UEs.”) , transmitting a first multicast session release response to the second network node; and transmitting a communication message to a third network node of the communication system (Dao: [0009] “method of Modifying a Multicast/Broadcast (MB) session to a plurality of Electronic Devices (EDs) connected to a (Radio) Access Network (R)AN node. The method includes receiving, from a Session Management Function (SMF) by a Policy Control Function (PCF), a request for policy and charging control (PCC) rules relating to the MB session & The method further includes transmitting, by the PCF to the SMF, the PCC rules. In some embodiments the method further includes transmitting, by the PCF to the SMF, a MB session modification request.”). Dao does not explicitly disclose the removal of session. Yan however discloses wherein the first multicast session release request includes an identifier of a multicast broadcast service (MBS) session (Yan: “eMCE 250 may identify that the multicast broadcast service session is in a first mode or a second mode,.”) ,; selecting terminal devices having joined the MBS session from terminal devices served by the first network node (Yan: “ selector 221 of the BMSC 220 may screen and obtain a cell #1 and a cell #2 according to event-related information and database knowledge and provide cell IDs of the cell #1 and the cell #2 to the session management module 222 & the session management module 222 updates the broadcast target area of the multicast broadcast service according to the cell #1 and the cell #2,”); wherein the communication message includes an N2 session management information to inform a fourth network node of removal of a predetermined terminal device (Yan: “the first base station corresponding to the first cell to allocate the radio spectrum resources for the multicast broadcast service. In step S705, the MCE 250 determines whether the old broadcast target area includes a second cell to be removed & in step S706, the MCE 250 notifies a second base station corresponding to the second cell to configure the state of the multicast broadcast session as the suspended state ”); . of the selected terminal devices, from the MBS session, wherein the predetermined terminal device is associated with the fourth network node. (Yan: “to determine that the multicast broadcast service belongs to one of the first mode and the second mode according to the flag; and in response to the flag matching a predetermined value, determining that the multicast broadcast service belongs to the first mode and suspending the multicast broadcast service.,”). Therefore it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Dao in view of Yan to figure out removal of session. One would be motivated to do so to control the base station to allocate or release the radio spectrum resources (RS1) for the multicast broadcast servicer (Yan). As per claim 43, Dao/Yan discloses the method of claim 42, further comprising transmitting an N4 session modification request to a user plane function for release of user plane resources (Dao: [0040] “a method of Modifying a Multicast/Broadcast (MB) session to a plurality of Electronic Devices (EDs) connected to a (Radio) Access Network (R)AN node. The method also includes, responsive to the trigger, configuring, by the SMF, any needed changes in the User Plane Functions (UPF),). As per claim 44, Dao/Yan discloses the method of claim 42, wherein the communication message also includes an N1 session management container which indicates release of the MBS session (Yan: “ the MCE 250 may add cells to the old broadcast target area or remove cells from the old broadcast target area to update the broadcast target area & the first base station corresponding to the first cell to allocate the radio spectrum resources for the multicast broadcast service. In step S705, the MCE 250 determines whether the old broadcast target area includes a second cell to be removed & in step S706, the MCE 250 notifies a second base station corresponding to the second cell to configure the state of the multicast broadcast session as the suspended state ”) Therefore it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Dao in view of Yan to figure out removal of session. One would be motivated to do so to control the base station to allocate or release the radio spectrum resources (RS1) for the multicast broadcast servicer (Yan). As per claim 45, Dao/Yan discloses the method of claim [[44]]42, wherein the N2 session management information includes a session stop for the fourth network node to release radio resources of the MBS session (Dao: [0120] “If the MB Session Context is to be deleted or established, the (R)AN node 302 may perform AN-specific procedure to release or establish the radio resources with the EDs 102.”). As per claim 47, Dao/Yan discloses the method of claim 42, wherein the first network node is a session management function and the second network node is a multicast broadcast session management function (Dao: [0120] “If the MB Session Context is to be deleted or established, the (R)AN node 302 may perform AN-specific procedure to release or establish the radio resources with the EDs 102. The (R)AN 302 sends the N1 SM MB Session Message 613 to each ED indicated by the SMF 310 & Each ED 102 may send to (R)AN 302 an N1 SM MB Session Message 616 in response to N1 SM MB Session message 611 sent by the SMF 310.”). As per claim 62, Dao/Yan discloses the method of claim 57, wherein the third network node is an access and mobility management function and the fourth network node is a node of a next generation radio access network (Dao: [0010 & 0033] “ receiving, from a Session Management Function (SMF) by an Access and Mobility Management Function (AMF), a request to modify the MB session & include a radio access network interface 122 for connecting to other devices over a radio link”). Claims 48, 50, 51-52, 56-58 & 63-66 are rejected based on rationale provided above. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 46, 49, 53-55 and 59-61 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. This includes: Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Sibte Bukhari whose telephone number is (571) 270-7122. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9:00 - 6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivek Srivastava can be reached on (571) 272-7304. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SIBTE H BUKHARI/Examiner, Art Unit 2449
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750796
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PHASE ALIGNMENT
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750157
DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744756
METHODS AND DEVICES FOR UE SERVICE MANAGEMENT
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745123
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING OPERATIONAL TEMPERATURE OF BASE STATION
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745318
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DISCONTINUOUS RECEPTION IN WIRELESS MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+35.9%)
3y 1m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 440 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month