Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/554,873

X-RAY SOURCE WITH ANODE EXCHANGE ARRANGEMENT, AND ASSOCIATED METHOD

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 11, 2023
Priority
Apr 12, 2021 — provisional 63/173,758 +1 more
Examiner
YUN, JURIE
Art Unit
2884
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Ncx Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
641 granted / 733 resolved
+19.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
742
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
35.3%
-4.7% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 733 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 13, 18-21, and 36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tkaczyk et al. (USPN 9,237,872 B2). With respect to claim 1, Tkaczyk et al. disclose an X-ray source device (X-ray tube - 100), comprising: a cathode arrangement including a cathode device (110) arranged to emit an electron beam (e-) therefrom; and an anode arrangement including an anode (105) spaced apart from the cathode device at a focal distance thereof, the anode comprising a plurality of focal spots (120) disposed thereon, wherein the anode is arranged to receive the electron beam from the cathode device at one of the plurality of focal spots, and wherein the anode is movable (via linear actuator - 135) such that each one of the plurality of focal spots is alignable to receive the electron beam (column 5, lines 5+). With respect to claim 18, Tkaczyk et al. disclose a method of forming an X-ray source device (100), comprising: arranging an anode (105) of an anode arrangement in spaced apart relation from a cathode device (110) of a cathode arrangement and at a focal distance thereof, wherein the anode comprises a plurality of focal spots (120) disposed thereon, wherein the anode is arranged such that the anode receives an electron beam (e-) emitted from the cathode device at one of the plurality of focal spots thereon; and arranging the anode to be movable (via linear actuator - 135) such that each one of the plurality of focal spots is alignable to receive the electron beam (column 5, lines 5+). With respect to claim 2, Tkaczyk et al. disclose wherein the anode is movable so as to maintain the focal distance of each of the focal spots of the anode from the cathode device (column 6, lines 46-48 - “Anode target 125 presents a constant focal point 120 distance from the cathode 110 by parallel movement of anode target 125 with respect to the cathode 110.”). With respect to claim 3, Tkaczyk et al. disclose wherein the anode (105) includes an elongate member defining a longitudinal axis and having a planar surface extending parallel to the longitudinal axis, wherein the plurality of focal spots (120) are arranged on the planar surface in a linear series parallel to the longitudinal axis, and wherein the elongate member is arranged with the longitudinal axis perpendicular to the electron beam (e-) and to be movable along the longitudinal axis (via linear actuator - 135) such that each one of the plurality of focal spots is alignable to receive the electron beam (column 5, lines 5+). With respect to claim 13, Tkaczyk et al. disclose wherein the anode arrangement comprises a stepper actuator in communication with the anode, the stepper actuator being arranged to move the anode along the longitudinal axis thereof or to rotate the anode about the longitudinal axis (column 5, lines 5-26). With respect to claim 19, Tkaczyk et al. disclose arranging the anode to be movable comprises arranging the anode to be movable while maintaining the focal distance of the anode from the cathode device (column 6, lines 46-48 - “Anode target 125 presents a constant focal point 120 distance from the cathode 110 by parallel movement of anode target 125 with respect to the cathode 110.”). With respect to claim 20, Tkaczyk et al. disclose wherein the anode (105) includes an elongate member defining a longitudinal axis and having a planar surface extending parallel to the longitudinal axis, and wherein the method comprises arranging the plurality of focal spots (120) on the planar surface in a linear series parallel to the longitudinal axis (column 5, lines 5+). With respect to claim 21, Tkaczyk et al. disclose wherein arranging the anode (105) to be movable comprises arranging the elongate member with the longitudinal axis perpendicular to the electron beam (e-) and to be movable along the longitudinal axis such that each one of the plurality of focal spots is alignable to receive the electron beam (column 5, lines 5+). With respect to claim 36, Tkaczyk et al. disclose wherein the anode arrangement comprises a stepper actuator in communication with the anode, and wherein the method comprises arranging the stepper actuator to move the anode along the longitudinal axis thereof or to rotate the anode about the longitudinal axis (column 5, lines 5-26). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-3, 13, 18-21, and 36 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection is based on the amendments made to independent claims 1 and 18, requiring the anode to comprise a plurality of focal spots disposed thereon. Tkaczyk et al. (USPN 9,237,872 B2), as seen above, disclose the anode comprises a plurality of focal spots disposed thereon. See column 5, lines 5+: “With movement parallel to cathode 110, focal spot 120 is moved across target 125 to assist with both spreading heat and reducing the chance of melting or cracking target area 125, enabling high power output. …A control system (not shown) is coupled to the linear actuator 135 to coordinate the translation anode 105 with the generation of the stream of electrons.” Thus, Tkaczyk et al. (USPN 9,237,872 B2) teach the anode comprises a plurality of focal spots disposed thereon. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JURIE YUN whose telephone number is (571)272-2497. The examiner can normally be reached 10:30 am - 7:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David J Makiya can be reached at 571 272-2273. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JURIE YUN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2884 April 16, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 21, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 10, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 10, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742730
ADSORPTION EVALUATION APPARATUS AND ADSORPTION EVALUATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742729
INTEGRATION OF FLUID ANALYZER MODULE MEASUREMENTS FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF FLUID SAMPLING AND PROCESSES FOR USING SAME
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12730080
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXTRACTION OF STRUCTURAL DATA OF A SAMPLE FROM SCAN DATA
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730008
SENSING DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12721571
DEVICE, METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING A PHYSICAL AREA NETWORK FOR DETECTING EFFECTS OF THE SUN
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 733 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month