Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/555,751

POWER MODULE WITH IMPROVED ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Oct 17, 2023
Examiner
SRINIVASAN, SESHA SAIRAMAN
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Danfoss Silicon Power GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
19 granted / 28 resolved
At TC average
Strong +53% interview lift
Without
With
+52.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
63 currently pending
Career history
91
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
71.4%
+31.4% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 28 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) submitted on 10/17/2023 and 11/13/2023 are in compliance with provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure is being considered by the Examiner. Response to Preliminary Amendment The preliminary amendment with respect to the claims, abstract and specification filed on 10/17/2023 have been fully considered for examination. Response to Arguments Applicant’s amendments (see Remarks, page 10) with respect to the substitute specification and marked-up versions filed on 10/17/2023 are considered and entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 4, 7, and 14-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim(s) 4, and 14-15 have the following limitation: “a first side of the protrusion is located next to a side of the first semiconductor component and separated by said first semiconductor component by an insulating gap or an insulator.” These claims are unclear and indefinite, since the paragraph [0036] of the instant application recites, “a first side of the protrusion is located next to a side of the first semiconductor component and separated from said first semiconductor component by an insulating gap or an insulator.” Claim(s) 7, 16-17, and 19-20 have the following limitation: “at least the first semiconductor component and the second semiconductor component are oriented at an angle between 45 degrees and 135 degrees to each other.” These claims are indefinite because “oriented at an angle…to each other” has no generally accepted definition for a given power module and the Specification does not clearly disclose or suggest the claim limitation mentioned above, other than a close relevant statement, “the angle is measured between...facing the protrusion…second track” is given in the paragraph [0043] of the instant application. Claim(s) 5-6, and 18 depend on rejected claim 4 are also rejected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 7-9, and 16-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hiroshi Matsuyama, (hereinafter MATSUYAMA), US 20170256483 A1. Regarding Claim 1, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, a power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) comprising two or more semiconductor components (Fig. 3, 21/22/23/24/25/26, semiconductor chip) which are electrically connected in parallel (Fig. 3, connected via second conductive section, 11a/11b to conductive layers 11/12), wherein each of the two or more semiconductor components (Fig. 3, 21/22/23/24/25/26, semiconductor chip) comprises a first power contact (Fig. 4, C1/C2, first/fourth collector electrode) and a second power contact (Fig. 4, E1/E2, second/fifth emitter electrode), wherein the first power contacts (Fig. 4, C1/C2, first/fourth collector electrode) of each semiconductor component (Fig. 3, 21/22/23/24/25/26, semiconductor chip) are electrically connected to a first track (Fig. 3, 11, conductive layer), wherein the second power contacts (Fig. 4, E1/E2, second/fifth emitter electrode) of each semiconductor component (Fig. 3, 21/22/23/24/25/26, semiconductor chip) are electrically connected to a second track (Figs. 3/4, 12, conductive layer) by a connecting means (annotated Figure 3), and wherein the connecting means (annotated Figure 3) comprises at least a first connecting element (Fig. 3, bonding wire, [0043]) connecting a first semiconductor component (Fig. 3, 22, semiconductor chip) of the two or more semiconductor components (Fig. 3, 21/22/23/24/25/26, semiconductor chip) to the second track (Fig. 3, 12, conductive layer) via a first contact area (Fig. 3, 12b, connected section), and a second connecting element (Fig. 3, bonding wire, [0043]) connecting a second semiconductor component (Fig. 3, 22, semiconductor chip) of the two or more semiconductor components (Fig. 3, 21/22/23/24/25/26, semiconductor chip) with the second track (Fig. 3, 12, conductive layer) via a second contact area (Fig. 3, 12c, connected section), wherein the second connecting element (Fig. 3, bonding wire, [0043]) partially overlaps the first contact area (Fig. 3, 12b, connected section) and/or first connecting element (Fig. 3, bonding wire, [0043]). Regarding Claim 2, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 1, comprising a third connecting element (Fig. 3, bonding wire, [0043]) connecting the first semiconductor component (Fig. 3, 22, semiconductor chip) with the second track (Figs. 3/4, 12, conductive layer) by a third contact area (Fig. 3, 12a, connected section), wherein the third connecting element (Fig. 3, bonding wire, [0043]) partially overlaps the first or second contact area (Fig. 3, 12b/12c, connected section) and/or first or second connecting element (Fig. 3, bonding wire, [0043]). PNG media_image1.png 995 891 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 3, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 1, comprising at least two connecting elements (Fig. 3, bonding wire, [0043]) per semiconductor component (Fig. 3, 21/22/23/24/25/26, semiconductor chip), which connecting elements (Fig. 3, bonding wire, [0043]) connect the semiconductor component (Fig. 3, 21/22/23/24/25/26, semiconductor chip) to the second track (Figs. 3/4, 12, conductive layer). Regarding Claim 7, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 1, wherein at least the first semiconductor component (Figs. 2/3, 22, semiconductor chip) and the second semiconductor component (Figs. 2/3, 23, semiconductor chip) are oriented at an angle between 45 degrees and 135 degrees to each other. Regarding Claim 8, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 1, wherein a landing area of the connecting means (annotated Figure 3) on the second track (Figs. 3, 12, conductive layer) is no larger than 150%, preferably 120%, and most preferably 110% of the sum of the contact areas (Fig. 3, 12a+12b+12c+12d, sum of the connected sections) of the connecting means (annotated Figure 3) in contact with the second track (Figs. 3, 12, conductive layer). Regarding Claim 9, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 1, wherein the at least two or more semiconductor components (Fig. 3, 21/22/23/24/25/26, semiconductor chip) are switching components (Fig. 3, switching function, [0054]). Regarding Claim 13, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 2, comprising at least two connecting elements (Fig. 3, bonding wire, [0043]) per semiconductor component (Fig. 3, 21/22/23/24/25/26, semiconductor chip), which connecting elements (Fig. 3, bonding wire, [0043]) connect the semiconductor component (Fig. 3, 21/22/23/24/25/26, semiconductor chip) to the second track (Figs. 3, 12, conductive layer). PNG media_image2.png 995 891 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 16, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 2, wherein at least the first semiconductor component (Figs. 2/3, 22, semiconductor chip) and the second semiconductor component (Figs. 2/3, 23, semiconductor chip) are oriented at an angle between 45 degrees and 135 degrees to each other. Regarding Claim 17, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 3, wherein at least the first semiconductor component (Figs. 2/3, 22, semiconductor chip) and the second semiconductor component (Figs. 2/3, 23, semiconductor chip) are oriented at an angle between 45 degrees and 135 degrees to each other. Regarding Claim 18, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 4, wherein at least the first semiconductor component (Figs. 2/3, 22, semiconductor chip) and the second semiconductor component (Figs. 2/3, 23, semiconductor chip) are oriented at an angle between 45 degrees and 135 degrees to each other. Regarding Claim 19, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 5, wherein at least the first semiconductor component (Figs. 2/3, 22, semiconductor chip) and the second semiconductor component (Figs. 2/3, 23, semiconductor chip) are oriented at an angle between 45 degrees and 135 degrees to each other. Regarding Claim 20, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 6, wherein at least the first semiconductor component (Figs. 2/3, 22, semiconductor chip) and the second semiconductor component (Figs. 2/3, 23, semiconductor chip) are oriented at an angle between 45 degrees and 135 degrees to each other. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 4-6, and 14-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MATSUYAMA, in view of Lawrence Edward Rinehart et al, (hereinafter RINEHART), US 5926372 A. Regarding Claim 4, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 1. MATSUYAMA does not explicitly disclose the power semiconductor module, wherein the second track comprises a protrusion, wherein a first side of the protrusion is located next to a side of the first semiconductor component and separated by said first semiconductor component by an insulating gap or an insulator, and wherein a second side of the protrusion is located next to a side of the second semiconductor component, and separated from said second semiconductor component by an insulating gap or an insulator. RINEHART teaches the power semiconductor module (Fig. 1, 10, power block), wherein the second track (Fig. 2, 12, base plate) comprises a protrusion (annotated Figure 2, 24, corresponding lead frames), wherein a first side of the protrusion (annotated Figure 2, 24, corresponding lead frames) is located next to a side of the first semiconductor component (Fig. 2, 22, dies) and separated by said first semiconductor component (Fig. 2, 22, dies) by an insulating gap or an insulator (Fig. 1, 16, insulating layer), and wherein a second side of the protrusion (annotated Figure 2, 24, corresponding lead frames) is located next to a side of the second semiconductor component (Fig. 2, 22, dies), and separated from said second semiconductor component (Fig. 2, 22, dies) by an insulating gap or an insulator (Fig. 1, 16, insulating layer). PNG media_image3.png 763 857 media_image3.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to have modified MATSUYAMA to incorporate the teachings of RINEHART, such that the power semiconductor module, wherein the second track comprises a protrusion, wherein a first side of the protrusion is located next to a side of the first semiconductor component and separated by said first semiconductor component by an insulating gap or an insulator, and wherein a second side of the protrusion is located next to a side of the second semiconductor component, and separated from said second semiconductor component by an insulating gap or an insulator. The insulating substrate (14) having an insulating layer (16) provides the electrical isolation between the base plate (12), the silicon dies (22) and the lead frames (24) to manufacture high power density modules (RINEHART, [Col. 3, Lines 5-15]; [Col 1, Lines 15-30]). Regarding Claim 5, MATSUYAMA as modified by RINEHART teaches the power semiconductor module according to claim 4. RINEHART further teaches the power semiconductor module (Fig. 1, 10, power block), wherein the protrusion (annotated Figure 2, 24, corresponding lead frames) is V-shaped (annotated Figure 2). Regarding Claim 6, MATSUYAMA as modified by RINEHART teaches the power semiconductor module according to claim 4. RINEHART further teaches the power semiconductor module (Fig. 1, 10, power block), wherein a gate signal conductor (Fig. 2, 26, aluminum wire interconnect, [Col. 3, Lines 30-35]) is disposed in the insulating gap (Fig. 1, 16, insulating layer) between the protrusion (annotated Figure 2, 24, corresponding lead frames) and at least one of the first semiconductor component or the second semiconductor component (Fig. 2, 22, dies). Regarding Claim 14, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 2. MATSUYAMA does not explicitly disclose the power semiconductor module, wherein the second track comprises a protrusion, wherein the second track comprises a protrusion, wherein a first side of the protrusion is located next to a side of the first semiconductor component and separated by said first semiconductor component by an insulating gap or an insulator, and wherein a second side of the protrusion is located next to a side of the second semiconductor component, and separated from said second semiconductor component by an insulating gap or an insulator. RINEHART teaches the power semiconductor module (Fig. 1, 10, power block), wherein the second track (Fig. 2, 12, base plate) comprises a protrusion (annotated Figure 2, 24, corresponding lead frames), wherein a first side of the protrusion (annotated Figure 2, 24, corresponding lead frames) is located next to a side of the first semiconductor component (Fig. 2, 22, dies) and separated by said first semiconductor component (Fig. 2, 22, dies) by an insulating gap or an insulator (Fig. 1, 16, insulating layer), and wherein a second side of the protrusion (annotated Figure 2, 24, corresponding lead frames) is located next to a side of the second semiconductor component (Fig. 2, 22, dies), and separated from said second semiconductor component (Fig. 2, 22, dies) by an insulating gap or an insulator (Fig. 1, 16, insulating layer). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to have modified MATSUYAMA to incorporate the teachings of RINEHART, such that the power semiconductor module, wherein the second track comprises a protrusion, wherein a first side of the protrusion is located next to a side of the first semiconductor component and separated by said first semiconductor component by an insulating gap or an insulator, and wherein a second side of the protrusion is located next to a side of the second semiconductor component, and separated from said second semiconductor component by an insulating gap or an insulator. The insulating substrate (14) having an insulating layer (16) provides the electrical isolation between the base plate (12), the silicon dies (22) and the lead frames (24) to manufacture high power density modules (RINEHART, [Col. 3, Lines 5-15]; [Col 1, Lines 15-30]). Regarding Claim 15, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 3. MATSUYAMA does not explicitly disclose the power semiconductor module, wherein the second track comprises a protrusion, wherein the second track comprises a protrusion, wherein a first side of the protrusion is located next to a side of the first semiconductor component and separated by said first semiconductor component by an insulating gap or an insulator, and wherein a second side of the protrusion is located next to a side of the second semiconductor component, and separated from said second semiconductor component by an insulating gap or an insulator. RINEHART teaches the power semiconductor module (Fig. 1, 10, power block), wherein the second track (Fig. 2, 12, base plate) comprises a protrusion (annotated Figure 2, 24, corresponding lead frames), wherein a first side of the protrusion (annotated Figure 2, 24, corresponding lead frames) is located next to a side of the first semiconductor component (Fig. 2, 22, dies) and separated by said first semiconductor component (Fig. 2, 22, dies) by an insulating gap or an insulator (Fig. 1, 16, insulating layer), and wherein a second side of the protrusion (annotated Figure 2, 24, corresponding lead frames) is located next to a side of the second semiconductor component (Fig. 2, 22, dies), and separated from said second semiconductor component (Fig. 2, 22, dies) by an insulating gap or an insulator (Fig. 1, 16, insulating layer). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to have modified MATSUYAMA to incorporate the teachings of RINEHART, such that the power semiconductor module, wherein the second track comprises a protrusion, wherein a first side of the protrusion is located next to a side of the first semiconductor component and separated by said first semiconductor component by an insulating gap or an insulator, and wherein a second side of the protrusion is located next to a side of the second semiconductor component, and separated from said second semiconductor component by an insulating gap or an insulator. The insulating substrate (14) having an insulating layer (16) provides the electrical isolation between the base plate (12), the silicon dies (22) and the lead frames (24) to manufacture high power density modules (RINEHART, [Col. 3, Lines 5-15]; [Col 1, Lines 15-30]). Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MATSUYAMA, in view of Nicola Schulz et al, (hereinafter SCHULZ), US 20120199989 A1. Regarding Claim 10, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 1, wherein the connecting means (annotated Figure 3) comprises one or more ribbon bonds (Fig. 3, bonding wire, [0043]). Though MATSUYAMA teaches the connecting means comprises bonding wire, MATSUYAMA does not explicitly disclose the power semiconductor module, wherein the connecting means comprises one or more ribbon bonds. SCHULZ teaches the power semiconductor module (Fig. 1, 10, power circuit arrangement), wherein the connecting means (annotated Figure 1) comprises one or more ribbon bonds (Fig. 1, 25, bonding elements being bonding wires or bonding metal sheet, [0039-0040]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to have modified MATSUYAMA to incorporate the teachings of SCHULZ, such that the power semiconductor module, wherein the connecting means comprises one or more ribbon bonds, so that the intermediate contact device being integrally formed with the bonding element saves costs and simplifies the mounting of arrangement (SCHULZ, [0026]). Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MATSUYAMA, in view of Koichiro Iyama, (hereinafter IYAMA), US 20190157194 A1. Regarding Claim 11, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 1. MATSUYAMA does not explicitly disclose the power semiconductor module in a vehicle. IYAMA teaches the power semiconductor module (Fig. 16, 100, semiconductor module) in a vehicle (Fig. 16, 300, an electric vehicle). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to have modified MATSUYAMA to incorporate the teachings of IYAMA, such that the power semiconductor module in a vehicle enable to suppress a temperature rise (IYAMA, [0101]). Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MATSUYAMA, in view of Kazuo Aoki et al, (hereinafter AOKI), US 20080290506 A1. Regarding Claim 12, MATSUYAMA teaches in Figures 2-5, the power semiconductor module (Figs. 2-5, 100, semiconductor device) according to claim 1. MATSUYAMA does not explicitly disclose the power semiconductor module in an inverter. AOKI teaches the power semiconductor module (Fig. 1, 1, semiconductor module) in an inverter (Fig. 6, inverter circuit). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to have modified MATSUYAMA to incorporate the teachings of IYAMA, such that all switching elements forming the three-phase AC inverter circuit are provided to the base plate integrally, whereby the three-phase AC inverter circuit having a small size and light weight can be easily be formed using the semiconductor module in an inverter that demonstrates a heating value (AOKI, [0003], [0078]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20160056132 A1 – Figure 29 STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE – Plan view of a section of a circuit arrangement comprising a plurality of semiconductor chips arranged in series. The connection conductors connecting the semiconductor chip with the collecting conductor track. US 20180102309 A1 – Figures 1A-1D STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE – Power semiconductor module includes a base plate, a substrate, a lead frame and a plurality of semiconductor elements that are electrically connected together. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SESHA SAIRAMAN SRINIVASAN whose telephone number is (703)756-1389. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30 AM -5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine S. Kim can be reached at 571-272-8458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SESHA SAIRAMAN SRINIVASAN/ Examiner, Art Unit 2812 /CHRISTINE S. KIM/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 17, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598923
METHOD FOR PRODUCING A SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE COMPRISING AN INTERFACE REGION INCLUDING AGGLOMERATES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593667
METHOD OF FABRICATING VOID-FREE CONDUCTIVE FEATURE OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593663
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF GATE STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588249
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICES INCLUDING A CROSS-COUPLED STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581701
DEVICE WITH DUAL ISOLATION STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+52.9%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 28 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month