Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/555,754

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 17, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, CUONG B
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
824 granted / 938 resolved
+19.8% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
986
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
41.9%
+1.9% vs TC avg
§102
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 938 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election without traverse of Species II (claims 1, 5-7 and 11) in the reply filed on February 6th, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 2-4, 8-10, 12-13 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Objections Claims 1, 5 and 11 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 recites “the non-conductive regions” in line 8 refers back to “a plurality of non-conductive regions” in line 5 and should be amended to “the plurality of non-conductive regions” for avoiding confusion. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 5 recites “the non-conductive region” in line 2 refers back to one of “a plurality of non-conductive regions” in line 5 of claim 1 and should be amended to “one of the plurality of non-conductive regions” for avoiding confusion. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 11 recites “the non-conductive regions” in line 13 refers back to one of “a plurality of non-conductive regions” in line 10 of claim 11 and should be amended to “the plurality of non-conductive regions” for avoiding confusion. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 5-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by YOSHIOKA et al. (Pub. No.: US 2011/0204380 A1), hereinafter as YOSHIOKA. Regarding claim 1, YOSHIOKA discloses a semiconductor device in Figs. 1-4 comprising: a channel layer (layer 3) and a barrier layer (layer 4) provided in this order on a substrate (substrate 1) (see Fig. 2 and [0027]); and a gate electrode (gate electrode 33), a source electrode (source electrode 31), and a drain electrode (drain electrode 33) that are formed on the substrate via the channel layer and the barrier layer and extend in a first direction (vertical direction in Fig. 1), wherein the channel layer or the barrier layer has a plurality of non-conductive regions (plurality of trench portions 8 within layer 4 and portions of layer 3) formed at positions opposed to the gate electrode and arranged side by side, with a predetermined interval (interval equal to width W1) interposed therebetween, in an extending direction of the gate electrode (extending direction of gate electrode 33), the non-conductive regions inhibiting a current from flowing to the channel layer (no current flow within portions of layer 3 that having trench portion 8 thereof) (see Figs. 2-4 and [0028-0029]). Regarding claim 5, YOSHIOKA discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the barrier layer has the non-conductive region (layer 4 has trench portion 8 within), and the barrier layer has, as the non-conductive region, an opening (trench portion 8) that penetrates the barrier layer (see Figs. 2 and 4). Regarding claim 6, YOSHIOKA discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 5, wherein the gate electrode has a branch section (a portion of gate electrode 33 within recess regions 42) that penetrates the channel layer through the opening (penetrate into portions of layer 3) (see Figs. 1, 2, 4 and [0024]). Regarding claim 7, YOSHIOKA discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 6, wherein the branch section includes a material having a thermal conductivity (thermal conductivity of metal Ni/Au of gate electrode 33) higher than a thermal conductivity of the channel layer (higher than thermal conductivity of GaN of layer 3) (see [0030]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: a. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. b. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. c. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. d. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MIURA et al. (Pub. No.: US 2015/0221758 A1), hereinafter as MIURA and in view of YOSHIOKA et al. (Pub. No.: US 2011/0204380 A1), hereinafter as YOSHIOKA Regarding claim 11, MIURA discloses a semiconductor device in Figs. 5-6 comprising: a channel layer (layer CH) and a barrier layer (layer BA) provided in this order on a substrate (substrate S) (see Fig. 5 and [0084-0085]); and a plurality of gate electrodes (plurality of gate GE), a plurality of source electrodes (plurality of source electrodes SE), and a plurality of drain electrodes (plurality of drain electrodes DE) that are formed on the substrate via the channel layer and the barrier layer and extend in a first direction (Y direction), wherein the plurality of source electrodes and the plurality of drain electrodes are alternately arranged in a second direction (x-direction) intersecting the first direction, the plurality of gate electrodes is arranged one by one between the source electrode and the drain electrode, and the channel layer or the barrier layer (see Figs. 5-6 and [0086-0090]). MIURA fails to disclose the channel layer or the barrier layer has a plurality of non-conductive regions formed at positions opposed to the respective gate electrodes and arranged side by side, with a predetermined interval interposed therebetween, in an extending direction of the gate electrodes, the non-conductive regions inhibiting a current from flowing to the channel layer. YOSHIOKA discloses a semiconductor device in Figs. 1-4 comprising: a channel layer (layer 3) and a barrier layer (layer 4) provided in this order on a substrate (substrate 1) (see Fig. 2 and [0027]); and a gate electrode (gate electrode 33), a source electrode (source electrode 31), and a drain electrode (drain electrode 33) that are formed on the substrate via the channel layer and the barrier layer and extend in a first direction (vertical direction in Fig. 1), wherein the channel layer or the barrier layer has a plurality of non-conductive regions (plurality of trench portions 8 within layer 4 and portions of layer 3) formed at positions opposed to the gate electrode and arranged side by side, with a predetermined interval (interval equal to width W1) interposed therebetween, in an extending direction of the gate electrode (extending direction of gate electrode 33), the non-conductive regions inhibiting a current from flowing to the channel layer (no current flow within portions of layer 3 that having trench portion 8 thereof) (see Figs. 2-4 and [0028-0029]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the plurality of non-conductive regions (plurality of trench portion 8) of YOSHIOKA into the semiconductor device of MIURA for the channel layer and the barrier layer having the plurality of non-conductive regions forming at positions opposed to the plurality of gate electrodes and arranged side by side for inhibiting a current from flowing into the channel layer because the modified structure would increase mobility within the channel layer of the transistor and further reduce ON resistance of the transistor. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CUONG B NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1509 (Email: CuongB.Nguyen@uspto.gov). The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:30 AM-5:00 PM Eastern Standard Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven H. Loke can be reached on (571) 272-1657. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CUONG B NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 17, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604583
HYBRID MICRODISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604516
SILICON CARBIDE POWER DEVICE WITH INTEGRATED RESISTANCE AND CORRESPONDING MANUFACTURING PROCESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598765
TRANSISTOR WITH LOW LEAKAGE CURRENTS AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593522
BACKSIDE ILLUMINATED IMAGE SENSOR AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588254
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PILLAR EXTENSION IN TERMINATION AREAS OF WIDE BAND GAP SUPER-JUNCTION POWER DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.0%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 938 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month