Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/557,252

VERTICAL TRANSISTORS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 25, 2023
Examiner
HO, ANTHONY
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
1007 granted / 1110 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1148
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§102
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§112
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1110 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 16-31, in the reply filed on February 23, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 32 and 33 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on February 23, 2026. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on October 25, 2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on December 13, 2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on February 9, 2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 17 and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 17 recites the limitation "the control electrode" in line 1 of claim 17. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 25 recites the limitation "the gate electrode" in line 1 of claim 25. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 16, 21-24, 26, 29, and 31 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sato et al (US Pub 2008/0142837). In re claim 16, Sato et al discloses a vertical transistor (i.e. 220), comprising: an outer region (i.e. where the Si substrate 214 is present) and a membrane region (i.e. region where the back-side trench 217 is present), wherein at least a portion of a semiconductor substrate (i.e. 214) is arranged in the outer region, wherein the semiconductor substrate is structured in such a way that a rear trench (i.e. 217) is arranged in the membrane region, wherein the rear trench is free of semiconductor substrate (i.e. by definition, the trench would not contain the semiconductor substrate); a masking layer (i.e. 227) in the outer region and/or in the membrane region; and a layer stack (i.e. 223, 222) in the membrane region, wherein the layer stack includes at least one drift layer (i.e. 222), at least one component-defining layer system (i.e. 211, 223), and at least one control terminal (i.e. 219 or 229, is controlled by an anode and/or cathode); wherein the masking layer (i.e. 227) is configured such that a region on the masking layer is substantially free of the layer stack (i.e. see at least Figure 18b) so that a lateral extension of the layer stack is adjusted using the masking layer (i.e. 227) (i.e. see at least Figures 16-18). In re claim 21, Sato et al discloses further comprising: a terminal contact (i.e. 215) arranged in the rear trench and electrically coupled to the component-defining layer system by the drift layer (i.e. see at least Figure 17). In re claim 22, Sato et al discloses wherein the masking layer (i.e. 227) is arranged directly on the semiconductor substrate (i.e. see at least Figure 18a). In re claim 23, Sato et al discloses wherein the layer stack includes a multitude of control terminals arranged in the membrane region above a common rear trench (i.e. see at least Figures 17 and 18). In re claim 24, Sato et al discloses wherein the layer stack is a first layer stack (i.e. leftmost stack is considered the first layer stack in Figures 17 and 18), and wherein a second layer stack (i.e. rightmost stack is considered the second layer stack in Figures 17 and 18), which includes the at least one drift layer (i.e. 222), at least one component-defining layer system (i.e. 211, 223), and at least one control terminal (i.e. 219 or 229), and the first layer stack are arranged in the membrane region above a common rear trench, wherein the first layer stack is laterally separated from the second layer stack (i.e. see at least Figures 17 and 18). In re claim 26, Sato et al discloses wherein the masking layer (i.e. 227) is arranged in the membrane region, and the second layer stack is separated from the first layer stack using the masking layer in the membrane region (i.e. see at least Figures 17 and 18). In re claim 29, Sato et al discloses further including a filler material (i.e. 228) on or above the masking layer, wherein the filler material at least partially contacts the layer stack laterally (i.e. see at least Figures 17 and 18). In re claim 31, Sato et al discloses wherein the semiconductor substrate includes or is formed from silicon (i.e. see at least paragraph 0175) and the component-defining layer system includes or is formed from gallium nitride (i.e. see at least paragraph 0189). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 17 and 25 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 18-20, 27, 28, and 30 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY HO whose telephone number is (571)270-1432. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM - 5PM, Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marlon Fletcher can be reached at 571-272-2063. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY HO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 25, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604478
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593662
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR DETECTING DEFECT IN SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12575309
PRODUCTION METHOD FOR PATTERNED ORGANIC FILM, PRODUCTION APPARATUS FOR PATTERNED ORGANIC FILM, ORGANIC SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE PRODUCED BY SAME, AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT INCLUDING ORGANIC SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12575267
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568758
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+2.3%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1110 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month