Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/559,477

LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT MANUFACTURING METHOD

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 07, 2023
Priority
Jun 30, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2021024870
Examiner
QUARTERMAN, KEVIN J
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sharp Display Technology Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
730 granted / 882 resolved
+14.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
901
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§102
46.3%
+6.3% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 882 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
U DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendment and remarks received 08 July 2026 have been entered and overcome the claim objections cited in the previous Office Action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5, 7-16, and 18-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Bang (US 2018/0366524). Regarding independent claim 1, Bang teaches a light-emitting element (Fig. 11) comprising a bank including a base portion (Fig. 6, Element 180; ¶ [0055]) and a first protruding portion (Fig. 6, Element 182; ¶ [0056]) protruding from an upper face of the base portion; and a first function layer (Fig. 6, Element 221B; ¶ [0094]), wherein at least a part of an end portion of the first function layer is located above the upper face of the base portion and adjacent to a side face of the first protruding portion (Fig. 6), and wherein the end portion of the first function layer is thicker than a portion of the first function layer formed in an opening of the bank. Regarding claim 2, Bang teaches at least a part of the first function layer formed extending over the first protruding portion (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 3, Bang teaches an inclination angle of the side face of the first protruding portion being less than 90 degrees (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 4, Bang teaches a step between the upper face of the base portion and an upper face of the first protruding portion being less than 10 µm (¶ [0084]). Regarding claim 5, Bang teaches the part of the end portion of the first function layer located above the upper face of the base portion (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 7, Bang teaches the first function layer including at least one of a light-emitting layer, a charge transport layer, and a charge injection layer (¶ [0094]). Regarding claim 8, Bang teaches the bank including a second protruding portion (Fig. 7, Element 181; ¶ [0056]) protruding from the upper face of the base portion, and the part of the end portion of the first function layer is located between the first protruding portion and the second protruding portion (Fig. 7). Regarding claim 9, Bang teaches a step between the upper face of the base portion and the upper face of the first protruding portion being larger than a thickness of the part of the end portion of the first function layer, and a step between the upper face of the base portion and the upper face of the second protruding portion is larger than the thickness of the at least a part of the end portion of the first function layer (Fig. 7). Regarding claim 10, Bang teaches an entirety of the part of the end portion of the first function layer being located above the upper face of the base portion and adjacent to the side face of the first protruding portion (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 11, Bang teaches the first protruding portion not surrounding the opening of the bank (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 12, Bang teaches at least one side face (Fig. 17; upper side face) of the first protruding portion including a meandering shape or a zigzag shape Regarding claim 13, Bang teaches the first function layer including a plurality of layers (Fig. 6; ¶ [0094]). Regarding claim 14, Bang teaches an insulating layer (Fig. 6, Element 170; ¶ [0050]); and an island-shaped electrode (Fig. 6, Element 210B; ¶ [0050]) located on the insulating layer, wherein the bank covers an end portion of the island-shaped electrode, a distance from an upper face of the insulating layer to the upper face of the base portion is equivalent to a distance from a surface of the end portion of the island-shaped electrode to an upper face of the first protruding portion, the island-shaped electrode has a uniform thickness, and the first protruding portion is located above the end portion of the island-shaped electrode (Fig. 13B; ¶ [0084]). Regarding claim 15, Bang teaches an insulating layer (Fig. 6, Element 170; ¶ [0050]); and an island-shaped electrode (Fig. 6, Element 210B; ¶ [0050]) located on the insulating layer, wherein the bank covers an end portion of the island-shaped electrode, a distance from an upper face of the insulating layer to the upper face of the base portion is equivalent to a distance from an upper face of the island-shaped electrode to the upper face of the first protruding portion, at least a part of the end portion of the island-shaped electrode is thicker than a central portion of the island-shaped electrode corresponding to an opening of the bank, and the first protruding portion is located above the part of the end portion of the island-shaped electrode (Fig. 13B; ¶ [0084]). Regarding claim 16, Bang teaches an insulating layer (Fig. 6, Element 170; ¶ [0050]) including a flat portion and a depressed portion depressed from the flat portion, wherein the bank covers the depressed portion, and the first protruding portion is located above the flat portion (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 18, Bang teaches a display device comprising the light-emitting element according to claim 1, the light-emitting element according to claim 1 further comprising a second function layer (Fig. 6, Element 220A; ¶ [0078]) that includes an end portion formed above the bank and that is located on a side opposite to the first function layer with respect to the bank, wherein at least a part of the second function layer is located above the upper face of the base portion and adjacent to the side face of the first protruding portion (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 19, Bang teaches a display device comprising the-light emitting element according to claim 1, the light-emitting element according to claim 1 further comprising a second function layer (Fig. 6, Element 220A; ¶ [0078]) that includes an end portion formed above the bank and located on a side opposite to the first function layer with respect to the bank, wherein the bank further includes a second protruding portion (Fig. 7, Element 181; ¶ [0056]) protruding from the upper face of the base portion, and at least a part of an end portion of the second function layer is located between the first protruding portion and the second protruding portion (Fig. 7). Regarding claim 20, Bang teaches the display device according to claim 19, wherein the bank includes a third protruding portion (Fig. 17, central Element 2181; ¶ [0128]) protruding from the upper face of the base portion and located between the first protruding portion (Fig. 17, right Element 2181; ¶ [0128]) and the second protruding portion (Fig. 17, left Element 2181; ¶ [0128]), at least a part of the first function layer (Fig. 17, Element 2220A; ¶ [0129]) is formed extending over the first protruding portion, at least a part of the second function layer (Fig. 17, Element 2230A; ¶ [0129]) is formed extending over the second protruding portion, the part of the end portion of the first function layer is located between the first protruding portion and the third protruding portion (Fig. 17), and the part of the end portion of the second function layer is located between the second protruding portion and the third protruding portion (Fig. 17). Regarding claim 21, Bang teaches the display device according to claim 19, wherein the bank includes a third protruding portion (Fig. 17, central Element 2181; ¶ [0128]) protruding from the upper face of the base portion and located between the first protruding portion (Fig. 17, right Element 2181; ¶ [0128]) and the second protruding portion (Fig. 17, left Element 2181; ¶ [0128]), at least a part of the first function layer (Fig. 17, Element 2230A; ¶ [0129]) is formed extending over the first protruding portion and the third protruding portion, at least a part of the second function layer (Fig. 17, Element 2220A; ¶ [0129]) is formed extending over the second protruding portion and the third protruding portion, the part of the end portion of the first function layer is located between the second protruding portion and the third protruding portion (Fig. 17), and the part of the end portion of the second function layer is located between the first protruding portion and the third protruding portion (Fig. 17). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 08 July 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to applicant’s argument, in regard to independent claim 1, that Bang does not teach the end portion of the first function layer being thicker than a portion of the first function layer formed in an opening of the bank, the Examiner notes that the “end portion” is broadly recited in the claim. Giving the claim its broadest reasonable interpretation, the Examiner interprets the “end portion” of the function layer to include portions extending from the center of the function layer. Fig. 6 of Bang shows the end portion of the function layer of Bang including a thicker portion extending from the center of the function layer being thicker than a portion of the function layer formed in an opening of the bank. Thus, Bang teaches the claimed invention, as discussed earlier in this Office Action. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kevin Quarterman whose telephone number is (571)272-2461. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Greece can be reached at (571) 272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kevin Quarterman/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875 19 September 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 08, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747841
CEILING LAMP MOUNTING STRUCTURE AND CEILING LAMP
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12733372
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING DISPLAY SUBSTRATE
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727330
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12713799
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12713776
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 882 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month