Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/560,714

DISPLAY APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 14, 2023
Priority
May 27, 2021 — JP 2021-089273 +1 more
Examiner
VLCEK, JACOB ALEXANDER
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allowance Rate
1 granted / 1 resolved
+32.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
17
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
81.1%
+41.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-6 and 8-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Akiyama (US 20130075761 A1) in view of Lee et al. (US 20110043464 A1) and further in view of Koh et al. (US 20170117496 A1). Regarding one interpretation of claim 1, Akiyama teaches a display apparatus (paragraph 0003) comprising: a light-receiving device (300; FIG. 3; paragraph 0045); a first light-emitting device (200; FIG. 3; paragraph 0044); and an insulating layer (102, 202, 302; FIG. 3; paragraph 0045; paragraph 0048), wherein the light-receiving device comprises a first electrode (301; FIG. 3; paragraph 0048), a light-receiving layer (303, 305, 306; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050; paragraph 0052), and a common electrode (307; FIG. 3; paragraph 0052) that are stacked in this order, wherein the first light-emitting device comprises a second electrode (201; FIG. 3; paragraph 0048), a first EL layer (203, 204, 205, 206; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051; paragraph 0052), and the common electrode (207; FIG. 3; paragraph 0052) that are stacked in this order, wherein the light-receiving layer comprises a first functional layer (303; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050), a second functional layer (306; FIG. 3; paragraph 0052), and an active layer (305; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050) between the first functional layer and the second functional layer, wherein the first EL layer comprises a third functional layer (203; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051), a fourth functional layer (207; FIG. 3; paragraph 0052), and a first light-emitting layer (205; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051) between the third functional layer and the fourth functional layer, and wherein the insulating layer comprises a region in contact (302; FIG. 3; paragraph 0048) with a side surface of the light-receiving layer and a region in contact (202; FIG. 3; paragraph 0048) with a side surface of the first EL layer. Akiyama does not teach the apparatus wherein the first functional layer comprises a first substance having a hole-transport property, wherein the second functional layer comprises a second substance having an electron-transport property, wherein an end portion of the active layer, an end portion of the first functional layer, and an end portion of the second functional layer are aligned or substantially aligned with one another, wherein the third functional layer comprises a third substance having a hole-transport property, wherein the fourth functional layer comprises a fourth substance having an electron-transport property, FIG. 4 of Lee et al. teaches a hole injection layer (33; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059) and a hole transport layer (34; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059) disposed between the sensor first electrode (41; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059) and the organic light receiving layer (45; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059) and an electron transport layer (36; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059) and an electron injection layer (37; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059) disposed between the organic light receiving layer and the sensor second electrode (48; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059) while a hole transport layer (34; FIG. 4; paragraph 0049), an emission layer (35; FIG. 4; paragraph 0049) , and an electron transport layer (36; FIG. 4; paragraph 0049) are also stacked. Lee et al. does not teach the display apparatus wherein an end portion of the active layer, an end portion of the first functional layer, and an end portion of the second functional layer are aligned or substantially aligned with one another. FIG. 1 of Koh et al. teaches a light-receiving device (paragraph 0028) with a rectangular active layer (150; FIG. 1; paragraph 0073) between a rectangular hole transport layer (120; FIG. 1; paragraph 0078) and a rectangular electron transport layer (170; FIG. 1; paragraph 0074), where all three layers are shown to be aligned with each other. Akiyama, Lee et al., and Koh et al. are analogous to the claimed invention in that they involve display apparatuses with light-receiving and light emitting devices. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Akiyama to have an active layer and a light-emitting layer between functional regions with hole transport and electron transport properties, where the layers are aligned. The hole-transport and electron-transport properties are known intermediate layers between the active layer/emission layer and the electrodes (Lee et al., paragraph 0029), and the alignment being the results of an embodiment using consistent rectangular shapes for the layers (Koh et al., paragraph 0068). Regarding a second interpretation of claim 1, Akiyama teaches a display apparatus (paragraph 0003) comprising: a light-receiving device (300; FIG. 3; paragraph 0045); a first light-emitting device (200; FIG. 3; paragraph 0044); and an insulating layer (102, 202, 302; FIG. 3; paragraph 0045; paragraph 0048), wherein the light-receiving device comprises a first electrode (301; FIG. 3; paragraph 0048), a light-receiving layer (303, 305, 306; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050; paragraph 0052), and a common electrode (307; FIG. 3; paragraph 0052) that are stacked in this order, wherein the first light-emitting device comprises a second electrode (201; FIG. 3; paragraph 0048), a first EL layer (203, 204, 205, 206; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051; paragraph 0052), and the common electrode (207; FIG. 3; paragraph 0052) that are stacked in this order, wherein the light-receiving layer comprises a first functional layer (306; FIG. 3; paragraph 0052), a second functional layer (303; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050), and an active layer (305; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050) between the first functional layer and the second functional layer, wherein the first EL layer comprises a third functional layer (207; FIG. 3; paragraph 0052), a fourth functional layer (203; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051), and a first light-emitting layer (205; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051) between the third functional layer and the fourth functional layer, and wherein the insulating layer comprises a region in contact (302; FIG. 3; paragraph 0048) with a side surface of the light-receiving layer and a region in contact (202; FIG. 3; paragraph 0048) with a side surface of the first EL layer. Akiyama does not teach the apparatus wherein the first functional layer comprises a first substance having a hole-transport property, wherein the second functional layer comprises a second substance having an electron-transport property, wherein an end portion of the active layer, an end portion of the first functional layer, and an end portion of the second functional layer are aligned or substantially aligned with one another, wherein the third functional layer comprises a third substance having a hole-transport property, wherein the fourth functional layer comprises a fourth substance having an electron-transport property, FIG. 4 of Lee et al. teaches a hole injection layer (33; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059) and a hole transport layer (34; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059) disposed between the sensor first electrode (41; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059) and the organic light receiving layer (45; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059) and an electron transport layer (36; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059) and an electron injection layer (37; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059) disposed between the organic light receiving layer and the sensor second electrode (48; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059) while a hole transport layer (34; FIG. 4; paragraph 0049), an emission layer (35; FIG. 4; paragraph 0049) , and an electron transport layer (36; FIG. 4; paragraph 0049) are also stacked. Lee et al. does not teach the display apparatus wherein an end portion of the active layer, an end portion of the first functional layer, and an end portion of the second functional layer are aligned or substantially aligned with one another. FIG. 1 of Koh et al. teaches a light-receiving device (paragraph 0028) with a rectangular active layer (150; FIG. 1; paragraph 0073) between a rectangular hole transport layer (120; FIG. 1; paragraph 0078) and a rectangular electron transport layer (170; FIG. 1; paragraph 0074), where all three layers are shown to be aligned with each other. Akiyama, Lee et al., and Koh et al. are analogous to the claimed invention in that they involve apparatuses with light-receiving and light emitting devices. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Akiyama to have an active layer and a light-emitting layer between functional regions with hole transport and electron transport properties, where the layers are aligned. The hole-transport and electron-transport properties are known intermediate layers between the active layer/emission layer and the electrodes (Lee et al., paragraph 0029), and the alignment being the results of an embodiment using consistent rectangular shapes for the layers (Koh et al., paragraph 0068). Regarding claim 2, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the display apparatus according to the first interpretation of claim 1. Akiyama does not teach the apparatus wherein the first substance is the same as the third substance. FIG. 4 of Lee et al. teaches the equivalents of the first functional layer and the third functional layer, the hole transport layer (34; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059), are separate portions of a connected layer. It would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Akiyama to have the two functional layers made of the same substance. This allows both layers to function for hole-transport (paragraph 0022). Regarding claim 3, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the display apparatus according to the first interpretation of claim 1. Akiyama does not teach the apparatus wherein the second substance is the same as the fourth substance. FIG. 4 of Lee et al. teaches the equivalents of the second functional layer and the fourth functional layer, the electron transport layer (36; FIG. 4; paragraph 0059), are separate portions of a connected layer. It would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Akiyama to have the two functional layers made of the same substance. This allows both layers to function for electron-transport (paragraph 0022). Regarding claim 4, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the display apparatus according to the first interpretation of claim 1. Akiyama further teaches the apparatus, wherein the active layer (305; FIG. 3; paragraph 0078) comprises a fifth substance (paragraph 0080), and wherein the first light-emitting layer (205; FIG. 3; paragraph 0082) comprises a sixth substance (paragraph 0082) different from the fifth substance. Regarding claim 5, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the display apparatus according to the first interpretation of claim 1. FIG. 3 of Akiyama further teaches the apparatus wherein the side surface of the light-receiving layer (303, 305; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050) is perpendicular or substantially perpendicular to a surface (301; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050) where the light-receiving layer is formed. Regarding claim 6, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the display apparatus according to the first interpretation of claim 1. FIG. 3 of Akiyama further teaches the apparatus wherein the side surface of the first EL layer (203, 204, 205; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051) is perpendicular or substantially perpendicular to a surface (201; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051) where the first EL layer is formed. Regarding claim 8, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the display apparatus according to the first interpretation of claim 1. Akiyama further teaches the apparatus wherein the first light-emitting layer (205; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051) has a smaller thickness in a region in contact with the insulating layer than a thickness in a region not in contact with the insulating layer (202; FIG. 3; paragraph 0048). Regarding claim 9, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the display apparatus according to the first interpretation of claim 1. Akiyama does not teach the apparatus wherein an end portion of the first light-emitting layer is positioned more inwardly than an end portion of the third functional layer and an end portion of the fourth functional layer. FIG. 4 of Lee et al. shows the hole transport (34; FIG. 4; paragraph 0045) and electron transport (36; FIG. 4; paragraph 0045) layers extending past the end points of the emission layer (35; FIG. 4; paragraph 0045). It would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Akiyama so that an end portion of the first light-emitting layer is positioned more inwardly than an end portion of the third functional layer and an end portion of the fourth functional layer. This allows the intermediate layers to formed as common layers (paragraph 0069) Regarding claim 10, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the display apparatus according to the first interpretation of claim 1. Akiyama further teaches the apparatus wherein an end portion of the light-receiving layer (303, 305; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050) is positioned more inwardly than an end portion of the first electrode (301; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050), and wherein the insulating layer (102, 202, 302; FIG. 3; paragraph 0045; paragraph 0048) comprises a region in contact (302; FIG. 3; paragraph 0048) with the side surface of the light-receiving layer and a region in contact (302; FIG. 3; paragraph 0048) with a top surface and a side surface of the first electrode. Regarding claim 11, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the display apparatus according to the first interpretation of claim 1. Akiyama further teaches the apparatus wherein an end portion of the first EL layer (203, 204, 205; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051) is positioned more inwardly than an end portion of the first electrode (201; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051), and wherein the insulating layer (102, 202, 302; FIG. 3; paragraph 0045; paragraph 0048) comprises a region in contact (202; FIG. 3; paragraph 0048) with the side surface of the first EL and a region in contact (202; FIG. 3; paragraph 0048) with a top surface and a side surface of the second electrode. Regarding claim 12, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the display apparatus according to the first interpretation of claim 1. FIG. 3 of Akiyama further teaches the apparatus wherein the active layer (305; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050) comprises a region in contact with the first electrode (301; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050) with the first functional layer (303; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050) therebetween. Regarding claim 13, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the display apparatus according to the second interpretation of claim 1. FIG. 3 of Akiyama further teaches the apparatus wherein the active layer (305; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050) comprises a region in contact with the first electrode (301; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050) with the second functional layer (303; FIG. 3; paragraph 0050) therebetween. Regarding claim 14, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the display apparatus according to the first interpretation of claim 1. FIG. 3 of Akiyama further teaches the apparatus wherein the first light-emitting layer (205; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051) comprises a region overlapping with the second electrode (202; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051) with the third functional layer (203; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051) therebetween. Regarding claim 15, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the display apparatus according to the second interpretation of claim 1. FIG. 3 of Akiyama further teaches the apparatus wherein the first light-emitting layer (205; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051) comprises a region overlapping with the second electrode (202; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051) with the second functional layer (203; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051) therebetween. Regarding claim 16, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the claim apparatus according to the first interpretation of claim 1. FIG. 1 and FIG. 3 of Akiyama further teach the apparatus further comprising a second light-emitting device (20; FIG. 1; paragraph 0039), wherein the second light-emitting device comprises a third electrode (201; FIG. 3; paragraph 0048), a second EL layer (203, 204, 205, 206; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051), and the common electrode (207; FIG. 3; paragraph 0052) that are stacked in this order, and wherein the second EL layer comprises a fifth functional layer (203; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051), a sixth functional layer (206; FIG. 3; paragraph 0052), and a second light-emitting layer (205; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051) between the fifth functional layer and the sixth functional layer. Akiyama does not teach the apparatus, wherein the fifth functional layer comprises the third substance, and wherein the sixth functional layer comprises the fourth substance. FIG. 3 of Lee et al. teaches a second emission area with the intermediate layer with the hole transport layer (34; FIG. 3; paragraph 0045) and the electron transport layer (36; FIG. 3; paragraph 0045) surrounding the emission layer (35; FIG. 3; paragraph 0045), being the same as in the first emission area. It would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Akiyama to have a second light-emitting layer between functional layers of the same material as the pair of functional layers surrounding the first emission layer. The hole-transport and electron-transport properties are known intermediate layers (paragraph 0029). Regarding claim 17, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the claim apparatus according to the first interpretation of claim 1. FIG. 1 and FIG. 3 of Akiyama further teach the apparatus further comprising a second light-emitting device (20; FIG. 1; paragraph 0039), wherein the second light-emitting device comprises a third electrode (201; FIG. 3; paragraph 0048), a second EL layer (203, 204, 205, 206; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051), and the common electrode (207; FIG. 3; paragraph 0052) that are stacked in this order, and wherein the second EL layer comprises a fifth functional layer (203; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051), a sixth functional layer (206; FIG. 3; paragraph 0052), and a second light-emitting layer (205; FIG. 3; paragraph 0051) between the fifth functional layer and the sixth functional layer. Akiyama does not teach the apparatus, wherein the fifth functional layer comprises the first substance, and wherein the sixth functional layer comprises the second substance. FIG. 3 of Lee et al. teaches a second emission area with the intermediate layer with the hole transport layer (34; FIG. 3; paragraph 0045) and the electron transport layer (36; FIG. 3; paragraph 0045) surrounding the emission layer (35; FIG. 3; paragraph 0045), being the same as in the receiving area. It would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Akiyama to have a second light-emitting layer between functional layers of the same material as the pair of functional layers surrounding the active layer. The hole-transport and electron-transport properties are known intermediate layers (paragraph 0029). Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Kahen et al. (US la20020171088 A1). Regarding claim 7, the combination of Akiyama in view of Lee et al. and further in view of Koh et al. teaches the claim apparatus according to the first interpretation of claim 1. Akiyama, Lee et al., and Koh et al. do not teach wherein an end portion of the first light-emitting layer, an end portion of the third functional layer, and an end portion of the fourth functional layer are aligned or substantially aligned with one another. FIG. 3 of Kahen et al. teaches an electron transport layer (245; FIG. 3; paragraph 0030), an organic light emitting layer (250; FIG. 3; paragraph 0030), and an electron transport layer (55; FIG. 3; paragraph 0030) stacked and having aligned endings. Akiyama, Lee et al., Koh et al., and Kahen et al. are analogous to the claimed invention in that they involve display apparatuses with light emitting devices. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Akiyama to have an end portion of the first light-emitting layer, an end portion of the third functional layer, and an end portion of the fourth functional layer are aligned or substantially aligned with one another. This is a result of depositing the materials uniformly (paragraph 0013). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Popp et al. (US 20150270313 A1) concerns a n organic optoelectronic component with light emitting and light detecting elements and layers. Park et al. (US 20040012028 A1) concerns an organic electroluminescent device with insulating layers and electrodes. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACOB A VLCEK whose telephone number is (571)272-9665. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 9:00 AM -5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eliseo Ramos-Feliciano can be reached at (571) 272-7925. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.A.V./ Examiner, Art Unit 2817 /RATISHA MEHTA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month