Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/563,975

MOLD FOR FORMING A TIRE AND TIRE PRODUCTION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Nov 24, 2023
Examiner
PAQUETTE, SEDEF ESRA AYALP
Art Unit
1749
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Bridgestone Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
261 granted / 415 resolved
-2.1% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
456
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
52.3%
+12.3% vs TC avg
§102
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§112
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 415 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claim 5 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to nonelected Group II (method for vulcanization molding of an unvulcanized raw tire), there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 07/11/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 4, the phrase “a spring member which is attached between the holder and the container corresponding to the spring member to retain the design surface dividing mold part corresponding to the spring member at a predetermined position” in lines 3-5 is unclear. It is unclear how a spring member is attached between the holder and the container corresponding to the spring member (i.e., itself). It is also unclear how the spring member is attached to retain the design surface dividing mold part corresponding to the spring member (i.e., itself). Further clarification is requested as to what “corresponding to the spring member” is intended to mean. For the purposes of examination, the examiner assumes a spring member which is attached between the holder and the container to retain the design surface dividing mold part at a predetermined position. Regarding claim 6, the phrase “a spring member which is attached between the holder and the container corresponding to the spring member to retain the design surface dividing mold part corresponding to the spring member at a predetermined position” in lines 3-5 is unclear. It is unclear how a spring member is attached between the holder and the container corresponding to the spring member (i.e., itself). It is also unclear how the spring member is attached to retain the design surface dividing mold part corresponding to the spring member (i.e., itself). Further clarification is requested as to what “corresponding to the spring member” is intended to mean. For the purposes of examination, the examiner assumes a spring member which is attached between the holder and the container to retain the design surface dividing mold part at a predetermined position. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Bachochin et al. (US 2008152742) (of record). Regarding claim 1, Bachochin discloses a mold for forming a tire for vulcanization molding of an unvulcanized raw tire into a tire (Figs. 1-2), the mold comprising: an annular tread molding part which is divided into a plurality of segments (Figs. 1-2: 16) arranged in a circumferential direction and which is configured to be opened and closed by moving each of the segments in a radial direction ([0017], [0024]-[0025]), wherein each of the segments (Figs. 1-2: 16) includes a design surface dividing mold part (Figs. 1-2: 19) which includes a tread design surface for forming a tread of the tire and which is configured to rotate around a rotatable shaft (Figs. 1-2: 44) perpendicular to a direction of movement of the segments (Figs. 1-2: 16) and also to an axis of the tread molding part when the tread molding part is opened after vulcanization molding of the tire (Figs. 1-2) ([0017], [0021]-[0022], [0024], [0025]). Regarding claim 2, Bachochin further discloses each of the segments (Figs. 1-2: 16) includes a holder (Figs. 1-2: see body/holder of each segment 16 having sides 32, 35, 36, 39) to be driven toward a radially outer side by a container (Figs. 1-2: 12, 14) when the tread molding part is opened (Figs. 1-2: see how holder 16 is driven radially outward by container 12 using surface 34, alternatively see how holder 16 is driven radially outward by container 14 comprising spring 48, 50), the design surface dividing mold part (Figs. 1-2: 19) is fixed to a radially inner side of the holder (Figs. 1-2: 16), and the holder (Figs. 1-2: 16) is supported by the rotatable shaft (Figs. 1-2: 44) to be rotatable in relation to the container (Figs. 1-2: 12, 14). Regarding claim 3, Bachochin further discloses the rotatable shaft (Figs. 1-2: 44) is disposed on a radially outer side in a one-sided manner in relation to the center of the holder (Figs. 1-2: 16) in the radial direction, and on one side in a direction of the axis of the tread molding part in relation to the center of the holder in the direction of the axis of the tread molding part (Figs. 1-2: see how shaft 44 is only on one side of the segment holder 16 in a radially outward and axially outermost manner). Regarding claims 4 and 6, Bachochin further discloses a spring member (Figs. 1-2: 48, 50) which is attached between the holder (Figs. 1-2: 16) and the container (Figs. 1-2: 14) to retain the design surface dividing mold part (Figs. 1-2: 19) at a predetermined position (Fig. 1), and when the tread molding part is opened (Fig. 2), elastically deforms to allow for rotation of the holder in relation to the container (Fig. 2) ([0019], [0024]-[0025]). Claim(s) 1-2 and 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Deshors (FR 2306069, see machine translation). Regarding claim 1, Deshors discloses a mold for forming a tire for vulcanization molding of an unvulcanized raw tire into a tire (Figs. 1-5), the mold comprising: an annular tread molding part which is divided into a plurality of segments (Figs. 1-5: 7) arranged in a circumferential direction and which is configured to be opened and closed by moving each of the segments in a radial direction (Figs. 1-5) ([0005]), wherein each of the segments (Figs. 1, 5: 7) includes a design surface dividing mold part (Figs. 1, 5: 6) which includes a tread design surface for forming a tread of the tire and which is configured to rotate around a rotatable shaft (Figs. 1-5: 8) perpendicular to a direction of movement of the segments (Figs. 1-5: 7) and also to an axis of the tread molding part when the tread molding part is opened after vulcanization molding of the tire ([0005]). Regarding claim 2, Deshors further discloses each of the segments (Figs. 1-5: 7) includes a holder (Figs. 1-5: see body/holder of each segment 7) to be driven toward a radially outer side by a container (Figs. 1-5: 10) when the tread molding part is opened ([0004]), the design surface dividing mold part (Figs. 1, 5: 6) is fixed to a radially inner side of the holder (Figs. 1, 5: 7) ([0005]), and the holder (Figs. 1-5: 7) is supported by the rotatable shaft (Figs. 1-5: 8) to be rotatable in relation to the container (Figs. 1-5: 10). Regarding claim 4, Deshors further discloses a spring member (Figs. 1-5: 16) which is attached between the holder (Figs. 1-5: 7) and the container (Figs. 1-5: 10) to retain the design surface dividing mold part (Figs. 1, 5: 6) at a predetermined position, and when the tread molding part is opened (Figs. 2-3), elastically deforms to allow for rotation of the holder (Figs. 1-5: 7) in relation to the container (Figs. 1-5: 10). Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEDEF PAQUETTE (née AYALP) whose telephone number is (571) 272-5031. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday 8:00 AM EST - 4:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KATELYN SMITH (née WHATLEY) can be reached on (571) 270-5545. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. The fax phone number for the examiner is (571) 273-5031. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEDEF E PAQUETTE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1749
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 24, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112
Mar 31, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589566
AIR BARRIER FILM TUBING TO REPLACE INNER-LINER (BUTYL)
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583195
MOLD FOR FORMING A TIRE AND TIRE PRODUCTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576605
TIRE CURING MOLD HAVING A REMOVABLE INSERT, AND ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576607
SPLICE-MATCH BUILDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576606
MOLD FOR FORMING A TIRE AND TIRE PRODUCTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+29.4%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 415 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month