Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/564,683

ULTRAVIOLET STERILIZATION DEVICE AND OPERATION CONTROL METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 28, 2023
Examiner
MCCORMACK, JASON L
Art Unit
2881
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Advance Solution Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
856 granted / 1016 resolved
+16.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1059
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
48.1%
+8.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1016 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 12 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 2 includes a period after “…generating the ultraviolet rays for a sterilization operation”. The claims are required to be in single sentence format, and this period divides claim 2 into two sentences and therefore it must be omitted. Claims 3 and 4 inherit the limitations of claim 2. Claim 5 recites a “plurality of distance detection sensors” and then recites “…distance measurement values generated by the plurality of distance detection sensor” and should recite “…distance measurement values generated by the plurality of distance detection sensors”. Claim 6 recites “…the control unit controls the sterilization angle adjusting unit to rotate corresponding reflector” and should be amended to recite “…the control unit controls the sterilization angle adjusting unit to rotate a corresponding reflector”. Claims 7, 8, and 9 inherit the limitations of claim 5. Claim 12 recites “A computer program product for performing al method of controlling…” and should be amended to recite “A computer program product for performing a[[l]] method of controlling…”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3, 4, and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3 recites the limitation "the relatively small conditional time constant value" in claim 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 4 recites the limitation "the entire lateral direction of the ultraviolet sterilization device" in claim 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim, as that claim does not define a lateral direction of the ultraviolet sterilization device. Claim 4 recites the limitation "the second direction" in claim 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 12 recites the limitations “the target surface”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 12 recites “…the sterilization angle is an angle formed between the pair of reflectors in a direction opposite the ultraviolet lamp made and a sterilization region…”. The word “made” renders the claim indefinite and it is unclear how this limitation should be read. Claim 12 recites the limitations “the ultraviolet rays” in the phrase “…region through which the ultraviolet rays generated by the ultraviolet lamp”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim, and this phrase should be amended to recite “…region through which Claim 12 recites the limitation “the distance detection sensor”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 10, and 11 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding independent claim 1; Stibich et al. U.S. PGPUB No. 2013/0330235 discloses an ultraviolet sterilization device comprising: an ultraviolet lamp 22 (“discharge lamp 22… generates ultraviolet light” [0066]), mounted on an interior of a body 24 (as illustrated in figure 1), configured for generating ultraviolet rays (“reflector system 60 is configured to redirect ultraviolet light propagating away from support structure 24” [0068]); a pair of reflectors (“reflector system 60 may, in some embodiments, include one or more additional reflectors (i.e., in addition to reflector 62)” [0069]), having surfaces reflecting the ultraviolet rays (“reflector system 60 is configured to redirect ultraviolet light propagating away from support structure 24” [0068]), being rotatable around respective rotation axes (“the optical filter/reflector assembly may be configured to rotate” [0109]); a sterilization angle adjusting unit (“reflection system 60 may be configured to optimize the incident angle at which ultraviolet light is directed to object surfaces” [0069]); a sensor unit, having a distance detection sensor that generates a distance measurement value related to the distance to a target surface (“targets may be identified by detection of the shortest distance from each disinfection source or detection of surfaces at a specified distance from each disinfection source” [0149]). However, Stibich does not disclose a control unit, configured for controlling an operation of the sterilization angle adjusting unit to rotate each of the pair of reflectors so that a predetermined sterilization angle corresponding to the distance measurement value is formed, wherein the sterilization angle is an angle formed between the pair of reflectors in a direction opposite the ultraviolet lamp made and a sterilization region through which the ultraviolet rays generated by the ultraviolet lamp pass is limited by the pair of reflectors that are rotated and positioned to form the sterilization angle. The prior art fails to teach or reasonably suggest, in combination with the other claim limitations, an ultraviolet sterilization device comprising: a control unit, configured for controlling an operation of a sterilization angle adjusting unit to rotate each of a pair of reflectors so that a predetermined sterilization angle corresponding to a distance measurement value generated by a distance detection sensor is formed, wherein the sterilization angle is an angle formed between the pair of reflectors in a direction opposite a ultraviolet lamp in front of the reflectors made and a sterilization region through which ultraviolet rays generated by the ultraviolet lamp pass is limited by the pair of reflectors that are rotated and positioned to form the sterilization angle. Regarding dependent claims 10 and11; these claims are allowable at least for their dependence, either directly or indirectly, upon independent claim 1. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON L MCCORMACK whose telephone number is (571)270-1489. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7:00AM-5:00PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Kim can be reached at 571-272-2293. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON L MCCORMACK/Examiner, Art Unit 2881
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 28, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603246
DETECTOR AND METHOD FOR OBTAINING KIKUCHI IMAGES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597714
TERAHERTZ DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597583
FIB AND SEM RESOLUTION ENHANCEMENT USING ASYMMETRIC PROBE DECONVOLUTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592356
SAMPLE HOLDER AND IMPEDANCE MICROSCOPE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586753
IMAGE ENHANCEMENT BASED ON CHARGE ACCUMULATION REDUCTION IN CHARGED-PARTICLE BEAM INSPECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+8.2%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1016 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month