Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/568,584

LIGHT DETECTING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 08, 2023
Priority
Jun 24, 2021 — JP 2021-104642 +1 more
Examiner
CHEN, DAVID Z
Art Unit
2815
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allowance Rate
307 granted / 686 resolved
-23.2% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+49.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
56 currently pending
Career history
753
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
§112
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 686 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Response to Amendment/Restriction Applicant's election with traverse of Species I, claims 1 and 21; Subspecies A, claim 5; Sub-subspecies 1, claim 6, and generic claims 2-4 in the reply filed on July 10, 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that “examination of all of the identified inventions and all of the pending claims would not result in a serious search and/or examination burden.” This is not found persuasive because the restriction requirement is under PCT Rule 13.1/13.2 of lacking unity of invention because the technical feature does not make a contribution over the prior art rather than under the search/examination burden under the US restriction practice. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Specification The title of the invention is broad and not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)(2) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0083268 A1 to Kim et al. (“Kim”). As to claim 1, Kim discloses a light detecting device, comprising: a plurality of pixels (PX) each having a photoelectric conversion region (110), wherein a structural body (311, 316) is formed in a lattice manner as viewed in plan on a semiconductor substrate (100) in which the photoelectric conversion region (110) is formed, the structural body (311, 316) having a first film (311) including a first material and a second film (316) including a second material different from the first material (See Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5A, ¶ 0035, ¶ 0040, ¶ 0051, ¶ 0055). As to claim 2, Kim further discloses wherein the first film (311) is a low refractive index film (311) in which the first material has a predetermined refractive index (See ¶ 0055). As to claim 3, Kim further discloses wherein the second film (316) is a high refractive index film (316) in which the second material has a higher refractive index than that of the first material (See ¶ 0051, ¶ 0055) (Notes: as evidenced by Column 12, lines 44-50 of Herner (US 11,004,895 B1), the index of refraction of aluminum oxide is 1.5 to 1.7). As to claim 4, Kim further discloses wherein the second material is aluminum oxide (AlOx) (See ¶ 0051). As to claim 5, Kim further discloses wherein the structural body (311, 316) has a structure that reaches an element isolation region (101) formed in the semiconductor substrate (100), as viewed in section (See Fig. 4, Fig. 5A, ¶ 0040). As to claim 6, Kim further discloses wherein the structural body (311, 316) has a structure that is thinner than the element isolation region (101) as viewed in section (See Fig. 4, Fig. 5A). As to claim 21, Kim discloses an electronic apparatus, comprising: a light detecting device including a plurality of pixels (PX) each having a photoelectric conversion region (110), in which a structural body (311, 316) is formed in a lattice manner as viewed in plan on a semiconductor substrate (100) in which the photoelectric conversion region (110) is formed, the structural body (311, 316) having a first film (311) including a first material and a second film (316) including a second material different from the first material (See Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5A, ¶ 0035, ¶ 0040, ¶ 0051, ¶ 0055). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID CHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-7438. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 12-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOSHUA BENITEZ can be reached at (571) 270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID CHEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 08, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707723
DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING CRACK DETECTING LINE
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702055
SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE WITH BENT EXTERNAL TERMINAL
4y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12690229
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH SPLIT-GATE AND METHOD FORMING THE SAME
4y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12684792
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE COMPRISING A TRANSISTOR REGION AND A CAPACITANCE ADJUSTING REGION
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12656839
DISPLAY PANEL INCLUDING CIRCUIT LAYER AND CONDUCTIVE LAYER ELECTRICALLY CONNECTED TO EACH OTHER THROUGH VIA AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
5y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+49.9%)
3y 7m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 686 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month