Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/569,532

METHODS OF DETECTING METHYLCYTOSINE AND HYDROXYMETHYLCYTOSINE BY SEQUENCING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 12, 2023
Priority
Jan 20, 2022 — provisional 63/301,370 +1 more
Examiner
RILEY, JEZIA
Art Unit
1681
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Illumina Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
1089 granted / 1313 resolved
+22.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1332
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
§102
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1313 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I (claims 1, 3-6 and 28) in the reply filed on 04/28/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that “both Groups I and II are directed to a method for identifying one or more hydroxymethylated cytosines in a nucleic acid by contacting the nucleic acid sample with an oxidative reagent, converting the hydroxymethylated cytosines to modified thymine moieties each having the structure of Formula (I) or (II) to form a modified nucleic acid sequence, and amplifying the modified nucleic acid sequence. The only difference between Groups I and II is that Group I uses a peracid as the oxidative reagent, and Group II uses hydrogen peroxide and at least one transition metal as the oxidative reagent. This difference represents merely an alternative species for performing the same oxidation step within the claimed method, rather than two distinct groups of inventions, as both Groups I and II are linked by a generic linking claim - claim 1. The proper requirement should be the election of a single species of oxidative reagent from the peracid and hydrogen peroxide with at least one transition metal”. This is found persuasive and Groups I and II have been rejoined and claims 1 and 3-8 and 28 have been examined. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-4 and 28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hayashi et al. "Base-Resolution Analysis of 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine by One-Pot Bisulfite-Free Chemical Conversion with Peroxotungstate", Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 138, no. 43, 21 October 2016 (2016-10-21), pages 14178-14181. Hayashi et al. discloses a method of identifying one or more hydroxymethylated cytosines of a DNA sequence comprising: contacting a DNA sample with peroxotungstate , which converts 5hmC into trihydroxylated thymine, which corresponds to the compound of Formula (II) of claim 1 (Fig. 1 A). The reaction is better explained in D5 (referred to by D1 ). Scheme 2 of D5 shows that the oxidative reagent reacts with 5hmC to form epoxidation or dihydroxylation intermediates and subsequent hydrolysation forms the modified thymine. Hayashi et al. also discloses that to investigate whether the technique is applicable to a low copies of DNA sample such as genomic DNA, the peroxotungstate-treated ssDNA was PCR amplified before Sanger sequencing (p. 14179, right-hand col. par. 2). The Supporting Information describes the application of the method on human genomic DNA (p. S4-S5). Sequencing comparison with unoxidized DNA allows the identification of the 5hmC positions (Fig. S4). Claim(s) 1, 3-4 and 28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by YUAN FANG ET AL: "Bisulfite-free and base-resolution analysis of 5-methylcytidine and 5-hydroxymethylcytidine in RNA with peroxotungstate", CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS, vol. 55, no. 16, 19 February 2019 (2019-02-19), pages 2328-2331. YUAN FANG ET AL discloses a method of identifying 5hmC in RNA using a similar method: contacting an RNA sample with peroxotungstate , which converts 5hmC into trihydroxylated thymine, which corresponds to the compound of Formula (II) of claim 1 (Fig. 1 a). The peroxotungstate-treated RNA was amplified by RT-PCR (Fig. 2b). Sanger sequencing of the PCR product from the oxidized RNA samples was also performed (Fig. 3). YUAN FANG ET AL further discloses that the method can be expanded to m5C sequencing in RNA by previously generating 5hmC from the oxidation of 5mC mediated by the TET enzyme (Fig. 4). Claims 5-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEZIA RILEY whose telephone number is (571)272-0786. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Benzion can be reached at 571-272-0782. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEZIA RILEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1681 11 July 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703881
METHOD FOR LABELING NUCLEIC ACID
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698523
ENHANCEMENT OF NUCLEIC ACID POLYMERIZATION BY AROMATIC COMPOUNDS
4y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697596
COMPOSITIONS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING ENCAPSULATED LYOPHILISED MICROSPHERES
4y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12680132
NUCLEOTIDE CLEAVABLE LINKERS WITH RIGID SPACERS AND USES THEREOF
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680127
METHOD FOR POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.3%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1313 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month