Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/570,148

ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOX

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Dec 14, 2023
Examiner
WILLIS, TREMESHA S
Art Unit
2847
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries, LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
679 granted / 873 resolved
+9.8% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
917
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
31.6%
-8.4% vs TC avg
§102
49.6%
+9.6% vs TC avg
§112
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 873 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1, 3 – 8, and 10 - 12 have been considered, but they are not persuasive. Please see the ground(s) of rejection below. Thus, Applicant’s traversal of the instant rejection on these grounds is deemed unsuccessful. Claim Objections Claims 6, 7, and 12 are objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claim 6: claim 6 depends from claim 2, a claim which has been cancelled. Regarding claim 7: claim 7 depends from claim 2, a claim which has been cancelled. Regarding claim 12: a period is needed at the end of claim 12. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yuji (JP 2012-028075A). Regarding claim 12, in Figure 6 (see Annotated Figure 6 below), Yuji discloses an electrical junction box comprising: a busbar (31); a molded resin portion (20, 21) that is insert-molded (page 5, paragraph 4) using the busbar as an insert component; a case (54) that covers the molded resin portion to form a waterproof space (rubber seal member 54 provides waterproofing of the waterproof region; page 6, paragraph 5); a blocking portion (40) that blocks a first opening out of a first opening (bottom opening of cavity 33) and a second opening (top opening of cavity 33) of a through hole (33, water-stopping material filling cavity 33; page 6, paragraph 2) passing through the molded resin portion (closing portion 40 blocks the bottom opening of cavity 33); and a waterproofing resin (45) that is filled in the through hole, wherein the molded resin portion includes a first holding portion that holds one end portion of the busbar, and a second holding portion that holds the busbar with the other end portion of the busbar being exposed in the waterproof space (see Annotated Figure 6 below), the through hole is formed between the first holding portion and the second holding portion and an entire periphery of an intermediate portion of the busbar is exposed in the through hole (see Annotated Figure 6 below), the blocking portion is a member that is provided separately from the molded resin portion (closing portion 40 of the first housing 11 is a separately provided member), and the waterproofing resin reaches the blocking portion while entirely covering the periphery of the intermediate portion of the busbar (the water-stopping material 45 covers the entire circumference of the bus bar portion that is disposed in the cavity 33), wherein the blocking portion includes a bottom portion configured to be seated into the first opening (bottom opening of cavity 33) so as to close the first opening (bottom portion of blocking portion 40 fills the bottom opening of cavity 33). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1, 3 – 8, and 10 – 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yuji. Regarding claim 1, in Figure 6 (see Annotated Figure 6 below), Yuji discloses an electrical junction box comprising: a busbar (31); a molded resin portion (20, 21) that is insert-molded (page 5, paragraph 4) using the busbar as an insert component, the molded resin portion having a first holding portion and a second holding portion (see Annotated Figure 6 below); a case (54) that covers the second holding portion of the molded resin portion to form a waterproof space (rubber seal member 54 provides waterproofing of the waterproof region; page 6, paragraph 5; the claim does not recite that the case covers only the second holding portion of the molded resin portion); a blocking portion (40) formed integral to the case and blocks a first opening out of a first opening (top opening of cavity 33) and a second opening (bottom opening of cavity 33) of a through hole (33, water-stopping material filling cavity 33; page 6, paragraph 2) passing through the second portion of the molded resin portion (closing portion 40 blocks the bottom opening of cavity 33); and a waterproofing resin (45) that is filled in the through hole, wherein the first holding portion holds one end portion of the busbar, and the second holding portion holds the busbar with the other end portion of the busbar being exposed in the waterproof space (see Annotated Figure 6 below), the through hole is formed between the first holding portion and the second holding portion and an entire periphery of an intermediate portion of the busbar is exposed in the through hole (see Annotated Figure 6 below), the blocking portion is a member that is provided separately from the molded resin portion (closing portion 40 of the first housing 11 is a separately provided member), and the waterproofing resin reaches the blocking portion while entirely covering the periphery of the intermediate portion of the busbar (the water-stopping material 45 covers the entire circumference of the bus bar portion that is disposed in the cavity 33). Yuji does not specifically disclose the blocking portion 40 being formed integral to the case 54. However, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to integrally form the blocking portion 40 and the case 54, since it has been held that forming in one piece an article which has formerly been formed into pieces and put together involves only routine skill in the art. Howard v. Detroit Stove Works, 150 U.S. 164 (1893). PNG media_image1.png 662 872 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 3, Yuji discloses wherein the blocking portion is welded to a peripheral edge portion of the through hole in the molded resin portion (Figure 6). Regarding claim 4, Yuji discloses wherein one of the blocking portion and a peripheral edge portion of the through hole in the molded resin portion is provided with an annular groove and the other is provided with an annular protrusion fitted to the groove (Figure 6). Regarding claim 5, Yuji discloses wherein a portion of the blocking portion that serves as a bottom of the through hole enters the through hole (Figure 6). Regarding claim 6, Yuji discloses wherein the blocking portion is welded to a peripheral edge portion of the through hole in the molded resin portion (Figure 6). Regarding claim 7, Yuji discloses wherein one of the blocking portion and a peripheral edge portion of the through hole in the molded resin portion is provided with an annular groove and the other is provided with an annular protrusion fitted to the groove (Figure 6). Regarding claim 8, Yuji discloses wherein one of the blocking portion and a peripheral edge portion of the through hole in the molded resin portion is provided with an annular groove and the other is provided with an annular protrusion fitted to the groove (Figure 6). Regarding claim 10, Yuji discloses wherein a portion of the blocking portion that serves as a bottom of the through hole enters the through hole (Figure 6). Regarding claim 11, Yuji discloses wherein a portion of the blocking portion that serves as a bottom of the through hole enters the through hole (Figure 6). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TREMESHA W BURNS whose telephone number is (571)270-3391. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am - 4:30 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Thompson can be reached at (571) 272-2342. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TREMESHA W BURNS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 14, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Nov 04, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 20, 2026
Interview Requested
Feb 23, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 23, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598702
PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598826
IMAGE SENSOR ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597533
METHOD FOR PRODUCING INSULATING COMPOSITE MATERIAL FOR SILICONE RUBBER SOCKET AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SILICONE RUBBER SOCKET INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593740
PACKAGE STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589452
NON-ELECTROCONDUCTIVE FLUX, CONNECTED STRUCTURE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING CONNECTED STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 873 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month