Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/570,223

COOLING COMPONENT AND DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Dec 14, 2023
Priority
Jun 21, 2021 — JP 2021-102169 +1 more
Examiner
TANENBAUM, TZVI SAMUEL
Art Unit
3700
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
NEC Platforms Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
529 granted / 779 resolved
-2.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
801
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
68.5%
+28.5% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 779 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to applicant’s 11/12/2025 amendment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the recitation “the refrigerant supply passage cooling the high-temperature region by the refrigerant” (lines 13-14) renders the claim indefinite as the claim recites method steps in an apparatus claim. See In re Katz and MPEP 2173.05(p). to overcome the rejection, the recitation should be rewritten as “the refrigerant supply passage is configured to cool the high-temperature region by the refrigerant”. Further regarding claim 1, the recitation “the refrigerant discharge passage being connected to the connecting passage, cooling the another region with the refrigerant supplied from the connecting passage, and discharging the refrigerant to the discharge port” (lines 19-21) renders the claim indefinite as the claim recites method steps in an apparatus claim. See In re Katz and MPEP 2173.05(p). to overcome the rejection, the recitation should be rewritten as “the refrigerant discharge passage being connected to the connecting passage, configured to cool the another region with the refrigerant supplied from the connecting passage, and configured to discharge the refrigerant to the discharge port”. Regarding claim 18, the recitation “a heat receiving layer that receives heat from the cooling targe” (line 3) renders the claim indefinite as the claim recites method steps in an apparatus claim. See In re Katz and MPEP 2173.05(p). to overcome the rejection, the recitation should be rewritten as “a heat receiving layer that is configured to receive heat from the cooling target”. Claims 2-17 are rejected as depending from a rejected claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 10-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kenny et al. (US 2005/0211427). Regarding claim 1, Kenny et al. discloses a cooling component (100) that cools a cooling target (99) including a high-temperature region (Figure 3B and Paragraph 60: See regions of 99 corresponding to hot spots of locations A and B) and another region (Figure 3B and Paragraph 60: See regions of 99 other than the hot spots of locations A and B), the high-temperature region rising to a higher temperature than the another region by heat generation (Paragraph 60), the another region rising to a temperature lower than the temperature that of the high-temperature region by heat generation (Paragraph 60), the cooling component comprising: A cooling section that faces the high-temperature region (Figure 3B and Paragraph 60: See regions of 102 directly overlapping the regions of 99 corresponding to hot spots of locations A and B), Another cooling section that faces the another region (Figure 3B and Paragraph 60: See regions of 102 directly overlapping the regions of 99 other than the hot spots of locations A and B), and A passage that is internally included in the cooling component and through which a refrigerant flows from an upstream-side supply port and toward a downstream-side discharge port (Figure 3B: See flow path from 108 to 109), where the passage includes: A refrigerant supply passage (Figure 3B: See plural channels 410 define by fins 110 that correspond to regions of 99 corresponding to hot spots of locations A and B) that includes at least one upstream-side passage (i.e. one of the channels 410 of the refrigerant supply passage) disposed inside the cooling section, the refrigerant supply passage cooling the high-temperature region by the refrigerant (Figure 3B and Paragraph 60), A connecting passage (Figure 3B: Defined by any of 105A-D) that is connected to the refrigerant supply passage (Figure 3B), the connecting passage being disposed at a position farther away from the cooling target than the at least one upstream-side passage (Figure 3B), A refrigerant discharge passage (See plural channels 410 define by fins 110 that correspond to regions of 99 other than the hot spots of locations A and B) that includes a downstream-side passage (i.e. one of the channels 410 of the refrigerant discharge passage) disposed in the another cooling section, the refrigerant discharge passage being connected to the connecting passage (Figure 3B), cooling the another region with the refrigerant supplied from the connecting passage (Figure 3B), and discharging the refrigerant to the discharge port (Figure 3B). Regarding claim 2, Kenny et al. discloses a cooling component as discussed above, where a heat receiving layer (98) that receives heat from the cooling target (Paragraph 38), a cooling passage forming layer (i.e. 102) that is disposed on the heat receiving layer and in which the at least one upstream-side passage and the downstream-side passage are formed (Figure 3B and Paragraph38), an intermediate layer (104) disposed on the cooling passage forming layer and in which the connecting passage is formed (Figure 3B and Paragraph38), and an upper surface layer (106) disposed on the intermediate layer and provided with the supply port and the discharge port are sequentially layered in a height direction (Figure 3B and Paragraph 38). Regarding claim 3, Kenny et al. discloses a cooling component as discussed above, where the at least one upstream-side passage includes a plurality of passages (i.e. 410) partitioned by a plurality of plate-like members (i.e. 110) disposed inside the cooling section (Figure 3B, see also Figures 6B and 6C), and the at least one downstream-side passage is arranged adjacent to the upstream-side passage (Figure 3B). Regarding claim 5, Kenny et al. discloses a device comprising: the cooling component according to claim 1 and the cooling target (see rejection of claim 1 above). Regarding claim 6, Kenny et al. discloses a cooling component as discussed above, where the at least one upstream-side passage includes a plurality of passages (i.e. 410) partitioned by a plurality of plate-like members (i.e. 110) disposed inside the cooling section (Figure 3B, see also Figures 6B and 6C), and the downstream-side passage is arranged adjacent to the at least one upstream-side passage (Figure 3B). Regarding claim 10, Kenny et al. discloses a device comprising: the cooling component according to claim 2 and the cooling target (see rejection of claim 2 above). Regarding claim 11, Kenny et al. discloses a device comprising: the cooling component according to claim 3 and the cooling target (see rejection of claim 3 above). Regarding claim 12, Kenny et al. discloses a device comprising: the cooling component according to claim 4 and the cooling target (see rejection of claim 4 above). Regarding claim 13, Kenny et al. discloses a device comprising: the cooling component according to claim 6 and the cooling target (see rejection of claim 6 above). Regarding claim 14, Kenny et al. discloses a device comprising: the cooling component according to claim 7 and the cooling target (see rejection of claim 7 above). Regarding claim 15, Kenny et al. discloses a device comprising: the cooling component according to claim 8 and the cooling target (see rejection of claim 8 above). Regarding claim 16, Kenny et al. discloses a device comprising: the cooling component according to claim 9 and the cooling target (see rejection of claim 9 above). Regarding claim 17, Kenny et al. discloses a cooling component as discussed above, where the connecting passage (i.e. any of 105A-D) is disposed at a position farther away from the cooling target (i.e. 99) in a z-axis direction (Figure 3B) than the at least one upstream-side passage (i.e. one of the channels 410) (Figures 2A-3B: The connecting passage is directly connected to the at least one upstream-side passage, whereas the cooling target is located at a distance from the connecting passage), an x-axis direction (Figure 3B) being a direction in which the high-temperature region and the another region are arranged, a y-axis direction (Figure 3B) being a direction in which the high-temperature region and the another region extend, and the Z-axis direction being a direction perpendicular to both the x-axis direction and the y-axis direction (Figure 3B). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 4, 7, 8, and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kenny et al. (US 2005/0211427), and further in view of Hao (US 2012/0120604). Regarding claims 4, 7, 8, and 9, Kenny et al. discloses a cooling component as discussed above. While Kenny et al. discloses a cooling member (36) for cooling a connecting passage cooling section facing the connecting passage is provided outside the cooling component (Figure 2A and Paragraph 37), Kenny et al. does not teach or disclose a cooling member provided outside the cooling component and in a portion on an upper surface of the cooling component that faces the connecting passage. Hao teaches a cooling component (100) that cools a cooling target (170), comprising at least: a cooling section (110) having at least one passage (130), where a cooling member (150) for cooling the at least one passage facing the at least one passage is provided outside the cooling component and in a portion on an upper surface of the cooling component that faces the connecting passage (Figures 1-2). As a result it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to configure the cooling component as disclosed by Kenny et al. with a cooling member as taught by Hao to improve cooling component heat exchange efficiency by providing the cooling component with supplemental surface area for dissipating heat from a cooling target. Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kenny et al. (US 2005/0211427), and further in view of Joshi et al. (US 2005/0200001). Regarding claim 18, Kenny et al. discloses a cooling component as discussed above. While Kenny et al. discloses that the cooling component comprises: a heat receiving layer (98’) that receives heat from the cooling target (Figures 2B- 3B), a cooling passage forming layer (102) disposed on the heat receiving layer (Figures 2B- 3B) in which the at least one upstream-side passage and the downstream-side passage are formed (Figures 2B- 3B), an intermediate layer (104) disposed on the cooling passage forming layer (Figures 2B- 3B) in which the connecting passage is formed (Figures 2B- 3B), and an upper surface layer (106) disposed on the intermediate layers (Figures 2B- 3B) in which the supply port and the discharge port are provided (Figures 2B- 3B), and where the heat receiving layer, the cooling passage forming layer, the intermediate layer, and the upper surface layer are sequentially laminated (Figures 2B- 3B). however, Kenny et al. does not teach or disclose a plurality of intermediate layers. Joshi et al. teaches a cooling component (100) that cools a cooling target (400), comprising at least: a heat receiving layer (520) that receives heat from the cooling target (Figures 4-5), a cooling passage forming layer (516) disposed on the heat receiving layer (Figures 4-5), a plurality of intermediate layers (508, 512) disposed on the cooling passage forming layer (Figures 4-5), and an upper surface layer (504) disposed on the intermediate layers (Figures 4-5), and where the heat receiving layer, the cooling passage forming layer, the plurality of intermediate layers, and the upper surface layer are sequentially laminated (Figures 4-5). As a result it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to configure the cooling component as disclosed by Kenny et al. with a plurality of intermediate layers as taught by Joshi et al. to improve cooling component heat exchange efficiency by providing a plurality of layers that are configured to increase a residence time of fluid flowing through the cooling component (i.e. increasing a number of fluid passes through the cooling component). Response to Arguments Regarding the arguments on page 8, lines 1-9: Applicant’s statements regarding the status of the application are noted. Regarding the arguments on page 8, lines 10-14: Applicant’s replacement drawings are accepted. Regarding the arguments on page 8, lines 15-19: Applicant’s amendment overcomes the 35 USC 112 rejections of record. However, the amendment appears to introduce new indefiniteness. Regarding the arguments on page 8, line 20 to page 10, line 3: Applicant alleges that Kenny does not teach or disclose “a refrigerant supply passage that includes at least one upstream-side passage disposed inside the cooling section, the refrigerant supply passage cooling the high-temperature region by the refrigerant”. Applicant's arguments have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. As set forth in the 35 USC 102 rejections as discussed above, it is noted that Kenny discloses a cooling section that faces the high-temperature region (Figure 3B and Paragraph 60: See regions of 102 directly overlapping the regions of 99 corresponding to hot spots of locations A and B) and a refrigerant supply passage (Figure 3B: See plural channels 410 define by fins 110 that correspond to regions of 99 corresponding to hot spots of locations A and B), where at least one upstream-side passage (i.e. one of the channels 410 of the refrigerant supply passage) is disposed inside the cooling section (i.e. 102). Specifically, the passages 410 are clearly located within the cooling section 102 (Figure 3B). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON N THOMPSON whose telephone number is (571)272-6391. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Friday 8:30 am -5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Frantz Jules can be reached at 571-272-6681. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON N THOMPSON/Examiner, Art Unit 3763 /FRANTZ F JULES/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 14, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Nov 12, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Apr 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680704
PACKAGED TERMINAL AIR CONDITIONER (PTAC) WITH AN INTEGRATED ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATOR (ERV) OR HEAT RECOVERY VENTILATOR (HRV)
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679628
TRANSPORT CONTAINER FOR TRANSPORTING TEMPERATURE-SENSITIVE GOODS TO BE TRANSPORTED, SAID CONTAINER COMPRISING CONTAINER WALLS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12656026
Liquid Desiccant Air Conditioner Modules Having Aerodynamic Features
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12656035
OBSTRUCTION DETECTION FOR A HEAT PUMP WATER HEATER SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12646727
Additional Cooling Pack with Fans to Handle and Peak Shave Fuel Cell Transients and High Ambient Temperatures
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+9.8%)
2y 8m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 779 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month