Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/573,152

SOLID-STATE IMAGE CAPTURING DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD, AS WELL AS ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 21, 2023
Priority
Jun 30, 2021 — JP 2021-108839 +1 more
Examiner
HENRY, CALEB E
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1082 granted / 1248 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1285
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
71.9%
+31.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1248 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claim 7 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 5/6/2026. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yu (10079259). PNG media_image1.png 503 719 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Yu teaches a light detection device, comprising: a semiconductor substrate (101) having a separating structure (107) between a plurality of pixels; an insulating film (please see ILD above protecting the photoelectric transducer devices) covering a light receiving surface of the semiconductor substrate; and a light blocking portion (please see the upper portion of 107 that separates color filters) disposed between a first color filter (109R) and a second color filte (109G)r, wherein the light blocking portion is in contact with a light-incident surface of the insulating film; and a low-refractive-index wall (fig. 3A: 305) disposed within a slit region (this region can be seen above wherein 305 resides), wherein the low- refractive-index wall has, in an upper surface thereof, a concavo-convex structure (please see above wherein 305 wraps around 107). Regarding claim 2, Yu teaches a light detection solid-state image capturing device according to claim 1, wherein the light blocking portion is disposed along the wall surfaces and a bottom surface of the slit (please see figure above). Regarding claim 3, Yu teaches a light detection solid-state image capturing device according to claim 1, wherein the light blocking portion is provided to fill the slit (please see figure above). Regarding claim 4, Yu teaches a light detection solid-state image capturing device according to claim 1, further comprising: a wherein the low-refractive-index wall is disposed provided between sides of the light blocking portions and between adjacent ones of the pixels and provided between color filters disposed above the insulating film (please see figure above). Regarding claim 8, Yu teaches a electronic device, comprising: a light detection device (300): including a semiconductor substrate (101) having a separating structure (107) between a plurality of pixels, an insulating film (please see figure above) covering a light receiving surface of the semiconductor substrate, and a light blocking portion (see rejection of claim 1 above) disposed between a first color filter and a second color filter, wherein the light blocking portion is in contact with a light-incident surface of the insulating film (please see rejection of claim 1 above); and a low-refractive-index wall disposed within a slit region, wherein the low- refractive-index wall has, in an upper surface thereof, a concavo-convex structure (please see rejection of claim 1 above). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5 (please note dependency) is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 6 (please note dependency) is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CALEB E HENRY whose telephone number is (571)270-5370. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eva Montalvo can be reached at (571) 270-3829. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CALEB E HENRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 21, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684934
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677421
MEMORY STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF MAKING
4y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672521
METHOD OF FABRICATING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE BASED ON A MEASURED MISALIGNMENT VALUE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672481
Display Device Including A Gap Between Light-Emitting Elements, Method For Manufacturing The Display Device, and Electronic Device
2y 12m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672289
MEMORY DEVICE INCLUDING WORD LINE CONTACT STRIPS AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+6.1%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1248 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month