Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/573,268

LIGHT-EMITTING AND PROTECTED NANOPARTICLE, A MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF AND AN APPLICATION THEREOF FOR THE OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE RADIATION CONVERTERS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 21, 2023
Examiner
HENRY, CALEB E
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Aledia
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1052 granted / 1217 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1265
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.8%
+9.8% vs TC avg
§102
36.3%
-3.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1217 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-11,13-16,18-19,23 and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Shimizu (20180040783). PNG media_image1.png 218 256 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Shimizu teaches a light-emitting and protected nanoparticle which is composed of a light-emitting nanoparticle in the form of a light-emitting core (1; par. 15) optionally totally or partially coated with a layer of first ligands (4) bonded to the surface of said core, said core, where applicable said layer of first ligands, being coated with at least one oxidation protective layer (4; par. 44-46 and 50), wherein said nanoparticle further comprises a layer formed of second ligands (2 and 3; par. 17-19) which are grafted to the surface of said oxidation protective layer. Regarding claim 2, Shimizu teaches a nanoparticle according to claim 1, wherein the core is chosen from quantum dots, metallic nanoparticles, metal oxide nanoparticles, silicon nanoparticles, germanium nanoparticles, nanophosphors, rare earth nanoparticles and carbon dots (par. 15). Regarding claim 3, Shimizu teaches a nanoparticle according to claim 2, wherein the core is a quantum dot (par. 11). Regarding claim 4, Shimizu teaches a nanoparticle according to claim 3, wherein the quantum dot comprises at least one semiconductor nanocrystal chosen from CdS, CdSe, CdTe, ZnS, ZnSe, ZnTe, HgS, HgSe, HgTe, CdSeS, CdSeTe, CdSTe, ZnSeS, ZnSeTe, ZnSTe, HgSeS, HgSeTe, HgSTe, GaN, GaP, GaAs, GaSb, AIN, AIP, AIS, AlAs, AlSb, InN, InP, InAs, InSb, InGaN, GaNP, GaNAs, GaPAs, AINP, AINAs, AlPAs, InAIPAs, SbTe, PbSe, GaSe, PbS, PbSe, PbTe, SnS, SnTe and PbSnTe (par. 15). Regarding claim 5, Shimizu teaches a nanoparticle according to claim 1, wherein the core is totally or partially coated with a layer of first ligands which are bound to the surface of said core and in that said first ligands are compounds of the following chemical formula: [Chem I] R-{tilde under (X)}{tilde under (.sub.n)}  (I) in which: n may be equal to 1, 2 or 3, X is a group capable of interacting with the light-emitting core through covalent, ionic or Van der Waals type interactions, R is a non-hydrolyzable organic group (par. 44-46 and 50). Regarding claim 6, Shimizu teaches a nanoparticle according to claim 5, wherein the core is a quantum dot and in that the first ligands which are bound to the surface of said core are chosen from octadecylamine, dodecanthiol, trioctylphosphine, lipoic acid, trioctylphosphine oxide, oyelamine, 9-octadecenoic acid and oleic acid (par. 29). Regarding claim 7, Shimizu teaches a nanoparticle according to claim 1, wherein the thickness of the oxidation protective layer is comprised between 1 nm and 400 nm (par. 18, 35 and 38). Regarding claim 8, Shimizu teaches a nanoparticle according to claim 1, wherein the oxidation protective layer comprises a plurality of layers superimposed on each other (par. 18, 35 and 38). Regarding claim 9, Shimizu teaches a nanoparticle according to claim 1, wherein the oxidation protective layer is a layer of metal oxide, of metal nitride or of oxynitride, taken alone or as a mixture thereof (par. 18, 35 and 38). Regarding claim 10, Shimizu teaches a nanoparticle according to claim 9, wherein the oxidation protective layer comprises at least one metal oxide chosen from Al.sub.2O.sub.3, SiO.sub.2, TiO.sub.2, ZrO.sub.2, ZnO, B.sub.2O.sub.3, Co.sub.2O.sub.3, Cr.sub.2O.sub.3, CuO, Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, Ga.sub.2O.sub.3, HfO.sub.2, In.sub.2O.sub.3, MgO (), Nb.sub.2O.sub.5, NiO, SnO.sub.2, Ta.sub.2O.sub.5 et HfO.sub.2, taken alone or as a mixture thereof (par. 18, 35 and 38). Regarding claim 11, Shimizu teaches a nanoparticle according to claim 10, wherein the oxidation protective layer comprises the following two layers: a 1st layer with a thickness comprised between 2 nm and 100 nm comprising Al.sub.2O.sub.3, a 2nd so-called “external” layer superimposed on the 1st layer and with thickness comprised between 5 nm and 50 nm, comprising TiO.sub.2, ZrO.sub.2, SiO.sub.2 or ZnO, taken alone or as a mixture thereof (par. 18, 35 and 38). Regarding claim 13, Shimizu teaches a nanoparticle according to claim 1, wherein the second ligands of the layer formed of second ligands which are grafted to the surface of the oxidation protective layer are silanes of the following chemical formula: [Chem II] R.sub.nSiY.sub.4−n   (II) in which: n is equal to 1, 2 or 3, Y is a hydrolyzable group, an alkoxy, halide or amine group, R is a non-hydrolyzable organic group (par. 17-19, 44-46 and 50). Regarding claim 14, Shimizu teaches a nanoparticle according to claim 13, wherein said second ligands are silanes of the following chemical formula (III): [Chem III] {tilde under (R)}{tilde under (.sub.n)}{tilde under (S)}{tilde under (i)}(OR′).sub.4−n   (III) in which: n is equal to 1, 2 or 3, R is a non-hydrolyzable organic group, R′ is an aliphatic organic group (par. 17-19, 44-46 and 50). Regarding claim 15, Shimizu teaches a Dispersion of light-emitting and protected nanoparticles according to claim 1 in an organic or inorganic non-aqueous solvent (par. 29, 30 and 36-42). Regarding claim 16, Shimizu teaches a dispersion according to claim 15, wherein the solvent is chosen from chloroform, toluene, hexane, 2-methoxy-1-methylethyl acetate (abbreviated PGMEA), ethyl acetate, acetonitrile and ethanol (par. 29, 30 and 36-42). Regarding claim 18, Shimizu teaches a resin composition, wherein it comprises light-emitting and protected nanoparticles according to claim 1 (par. 38, 56). Regarding claim 19, Shimizu teaches a resin composition according to claim 18, wherein the resin is a photo- or heat-sensitive resin chosen from vinyl ester, epoxy acrylate, polyimide and unsaturated polyester resins (par. 38, 56). Regarding claim 23, Shimizu teaches a method for manufacturing light-emitting and protected nanoparticles according to claim 1, wherein it comprises at least the following steps: a) light-emitting nanoparticles are provided in the form of light-emitting cores which are optionally totally or partially coated with a layer of first ligands which are bonded to the surface of said cores; b) the cores, where appropriate the layer of first ligands of these cores, are coated with an oxidation protective layer by atomic layer deposition (commonly called “ALD”) so as to obtain nanoparticles whose core is protected, where appropriate whose core totally or partially coated with a layer of first ligands is protected; c) the nanoparticles obtained at the end of step b) are dispersed in a solution of second ligands so that the second ligands are grafted to the surface of the oxidation protective layer by forming a layer of second ligands on the surface of said oxidation protective layer (par. 35). Regarding claim 26, Shimizu teaches a resin composition according to claim 18 configured as a radiation converter of an optoelectronic device (par. 57-60; please note that LED is a form of radiation conversion). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 12 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 20 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 21 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 22 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 21. Claim 24 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims Claim 25 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CALEB E HENRY whose telephone number is (571)270-5370. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eva Montalvo can be reached at (571) 270-3829. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CALEB E HENRY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 21, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604596
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A PEROVSKITE SOLAR CELL WITH AN IMPROVED HOLE TRANSPORT LAYER AND A PEROVSKITE SOLAR CELL WITH AN IMPROVED HOLE TRANSPORT LAYER MANUFACTURED BY THE SAME METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604650
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT AND LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE USING PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY TECHNIQUE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598801
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE OF PHYSICAL UNCLONABLE FUNCTION AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588440
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR ETCHING USING OXDIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584068
COMPOUND FOR ORGANIC ELECTRIC ELEMENT, ORGANIC ELECTRIC ELEMENT USING THE SAME, AND AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+6.2%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1217 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month