Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/574,520

RUBBER COMPOSITION AND TIRE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 27, 2023
Priority
Jun 29, 2021 — JP 2021-107298 +1 more
Examiner
FISCHER, JUSTIN R
Art Unit
1749
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
46%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allowance Rate
733 granted / 1658 resolved
-20.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
81 currently pending
Career history
1756
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
70.8%
+30.8% vs TC avg
§102
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1658 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on June 25, 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hirokawa (JP 2011-148956). Hirokawa is directed to a rubber composition comprising a modified natural rubber, polybutadiene rubber, and 5-100 phr of a filler, such as carbon black and silica. More particularly, said modified natural rubber includes a hydrazide compound having a pyridyl group as a nitrogen-containing heterocyclic group (polar group). In regards to the specific group, Hirokawa teaches the use of picolinohydrazide (corresponds with claimed picolinic acid hydrazide). Given the disclosure to include 5-100 phr of a filler (e.g. silica and carbon black), it reasons that one of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to select a silica loading between 5 phr and 30 phr (consistent with the broad filler loading range and Applicant has not provided a conclusive showing of unexpected results for a silica loading as claimed- lack of comparative examples with non-inventive silica loadings). Additionally, silane coupling agents are extensively used in tire rubber compositions including silica in order to improve dispersion of silica in the rubber composition. Furthermore, the claimed loadings are consistent with those that are conventionally used in silica-containing tire rubber compositions. With further respect to claim 1, a plurality of exemplary compositions in Tables 1 and 2 include a modified natural rubber loading of 50% and in accordance to the claimed invention. Lastly, regarding claim 1, Horikawa describes a hydrazide loading as high as 5% by mass in regards to the natural rubber loading. Thus, when looking at the rubber composition as a whole (claimed diene component), a hydrazide loading of 2.5% would be present when equal amounts of modified rubber and butadiene rubber are included. As to claim 8, Hirokawa describes a tire tread component. Response to Arguments 5. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 and 8 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. It is noted that while Hirokawa describes the use of picolinohydrazide (inventive) and isonicotinohydrazide (non-inventive), it is not required for a reference to solely disclose inventive embodiments. In such an instance, Hirokawa only describes 2 hydrazide compounds having pyridyl groups as a nitrogen-containing heterocyclic groups. Given the extremely limited number of hydrazide compounds having pyridyl groups, it reasons that each is expressly disclosed by Horikawa. Conclusion 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN R FISCHER whose telephone number is (571)272-1215. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 5:30-2:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Katelyn Smith can be reached at 571-270-5545. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Justin Fischer /JUSTIN R FISCHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1749 June 29, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 27, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 21, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 25, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703203
TIRE
1y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691709
A SELF-SUPPORTING TYRE FOR AUTOMOTIVE WHEELS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12679144
HEAVY DUTY TIRE
1y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668691
THERMOPLASTIC RESIN COMPOSITION
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12654496
Run Flat System Having a Spring Suspension
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
46%
With Interview (+2.3%)
3y 4m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1658 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month